-
Posts
5616 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by BruceVC
-
Congrats to both of you! Yes Gratz indeed Shady
-
Change your profile picture (If you haven't changed it within two weeks)
BruceVC replied to Namutree's topic in Way Off-Topic
You can keep yours. I give you permission. Namutree post that profile picture for me....I have the feeling it will make me laugh Only if you promise to use it as your new profile pic. At least for a day. Okay but I really should see it first....but I suppose how bad can it be? Okay I promise to use it for a day or so -
Change your profile picture (If you haven't changed it within two weeks)
BruceVC replied to Namutree's topic in Way Off-Topic
You can keep yours. I give you permission. Namutree post that profile picture for me....I have the feeling it will make me laugh -
Calax, I'm sure we've batted this ball around before. Libertarians are not anarchists. Libertarians are not opposed to taxes. We are opposed to writing a blank check to a federal government that is doing things it has no business or legal authority to do. The gist of the libertarian political philosophy (the modern version of it, not the 1950's objectivist utopia crap) is that all level of government have specific functions that should be well defined and narrowly construed and that it be sufficiently funded only enough to fulfill those functions. The Federal government has it's responsibilities including securing the borders, maintaining the currency, etc., the state, county, city, governments have theirs. You know what they are, you of all people do not need a civics lesson from me. The real trouble begins when those governments get into things they shouldn't be doing or assuming power they should not have. I have never understood what a Libertarian stands for or actually means in the US political landscape ...that seems like good description
-
I would oppose that. Granted I've opposed all US aggression in my lifetime, and voted accordingly. Too bad most people aren't like me in this regard. If you knew my history on this forum; you'd know that I'm among the very most skeptical of US foreign policy. Yes Namutree has always opposed Western military intervention unless the Wests interests are truly threatened . that is true. And he refuses to change his mind despite my efforts And people have been interfering and trying to defeat the West for decades. The West has faced threats like fascism, communism and now Islamic extremism..and the West has always persevered, survived and evolved. So please don't think the West hasn't been under attack in its history....it has been and it is currently. But this is something we can address and we will deal with it So take your best shot, please ...interfere as much as you want, it won't change the reality of the world and this is something you really don't want to admit " the West offers its citizens the best quality of life and has the happiest citizens " ..which is why it is the most dominant ideology in the world
-
You funny Please post a link refuting what I am saying, I am keen to read it as long as its relatively credible....in other words I don't assume all right wing websites are automatically wrong but I would reject something from a white, supremacist website . But I don't think you would post something from that type of source
-
Change your profile picture (If you haven't changed it within two weeks)
BruceVC replied to Namutree's topic in Way Off-Topic
Yeah I also don't think I'm going to change mine -
Their countries won't be a mess if not because of the west...the west who messed up their countries. Such as in Afhanistan, USA who supply the Mujahidden to fight Russia and then let them loose, you give weapons to mad men, then these mad men rule, what do you expect? Below is Afghanistan before ad after USA using Mujahiddeen to fight Russian. If the west don't intervine, Afghans won't bother to migrate to the west.... Below is Iraq before and after USA topple Saddam Hussein Western peoples are hypocrite...you claim you are better than anyone, it is just because you destroy everyone else No, you are mistaken So yes some mistakes were made by the West, like the invasion of Iraq and the reasons we were given But countries need to learn once they have independence they need to practice good governance and be inclusive of all there citizens ISIS also wouldn't be in existence if the current Shia and Iranian influenced government in Iraq had incorporated the Sunni minority...so that's on al-Maliki He ostracized the Sunni minority in Iraq and they felt like they weren't part of the new Iraq....so the new Iraqi government failed to be inclusive of all its citizens. This lead to the tribal Sunnis aligning with ISIS and supporting them...this is not the Wests fault So its very important to remember that if the West really wanted to destroy the Middle East....it really doesn't have to do too much as certain countries are doing it to themselves
-
Change your profile picture (If you haven't changed it within two weeks)
BruceVC replied to Namutree's topic in Way Off-Topic
You know I don't think I've changed my profile picture in......over 3 years ? -
Yes China did have the most advanced civilization for 3000 years...but that ended 600 years ago Now the West has the most advanced, tolerant and progressive civilization in the world. Its not hard to understand why this is I am not suggesting Western superiority because I am some sort of Western zealot, the facts speak for themselves. Even Muslims from countries that supposedly dislike the West, like Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria want to immigrate to the West You should ask the various refugees why they consider Western culture preferable to living in the Middle East...blame them for creating this view '"that the West offers the quality of life "
-
@ Meshugger No the future is fine .. but lets clarify something important are you concerned about the future of the West or white men. Or lets say the white race Some people believe there are various overt and covert social and political campaigns and stratagems to marginalize and undermine the white race and I'm not talking about white Aryans. I mean normal white people who are honestly concerned about the future So what ails you so ? You post like a woman, answering questions with questions. Well if you can't clarify what you mean then I can't give you that rosy picture of the future, but things are fine.....the West is fine. Don't worry so much Don't play dumb. How will they be fine? How will society be better? How will the trust in the institutions and the leaders be better? How will crime be less? How will terrorism erode away? How will economic development be better? How will social cohesion better? How will social mobility be improved? This wave of refugees are anything but helping the situation, that's for sure. I have only heard good evidence for different degrees for doom & gloom. So lets reverse the tide somehow, spread your solutions with positivism or otherwise there will be wars. Lets hear it, Bruce. Seriously...wars between who? Wars between the disheartened and disillusioned Syrian refugees and the West...wow that's a real threat. The West has been the most dominant ideology\government for 500 years because it follows certain rules and systems of governance that have been proved the BEST ways to run a country and ensure that the West has the happiest citizens in the world. The relevance of the " happiest citizens in the world " cannot be ignored because this is a real metric that should be used to determine if a particular government is really successful. Its not about GDP, military might or a respected government. These are all factors but end of the day what we should simply ask when we ponder the question " what makes a good government\ideology " is simply " are the citizens happy " If the citizens are happy then there is no reason that system of government will end ...its as simple as that And if you think somehow terrorist attacks are going to undermine the West then that's an egregious misunderstanding. Attacks like Paris shootings unite countries and unions like the EU. They make governments more resolute and steadfast in dealing with the particular issue. Terrorism and bomb blasts have never historically caused any government to say " oh well, time to change our core and fundamental beliefs because of some extremist group " Hollande and France have reaffirmed military alliances with Russia and even Germany is now more committed to a military solution, we also have the UK voting again on airstrikes in Syria So lets be clear on this point " ISIS or any extremist attacks on the West are just going to unite the West " ..not weaken it So I'm sorry I don't understand or support this notion that the West is going to be defeated or face some of sort of structural social and political change due to Islamic extremism The facts don't support the reality my Finnish friend
-
Yes it is if its objective is to ensure greater safety ....which is aligned to freedom Isn't a safe society a free society? But if you are referring to programs like Prism maybe you can give me one example around how you personal freedom has been impacted by Prism...for example do you know people who have been arrested due to Prism surveillance? I keep hearing how " the Federal government under Obama has eroded our freedom " yet I don't see any tangible examples of this except for rhetoric and diatribe against Obama ?
-
What the heck did I just read!? This is madness! I have so many questions! A) Why is he named patriotpony1986? If patriotpony was already taken then why not just choose a different friggin' name? B) Ayn Rand is not a conservative. So why is a "proud conservative" trying to enmesh her philosophy with things. C) My little pony contains huge amounts of mysticism and mystic thinking which Ayn Rand despises thus making the values of objectivism and MLP incompatible. Why would some one so obsessed with Ayn Rand that he tries to enmesh her philosophy into stuff not be aware of this? D) He says that if we meet that HE IS THE MAN in the relationship. What does that even mean? E) How does he talk about the liberal agenda as something that is eroding freedom in Equestria if he wants to enmesh Equestria with Ayn Rand's values? Does he not realize that Ayn Rand is a liberal? It's a 26 year old obsessed with a children's show, it shouldn't make sense. ... We all realize that's from a dating website right? That makes it funnier. Well at least he is being honest, after reading that and still going on a date with him it seems unlikely any prospective date can say " I never knew he was like that " ....or " he never seemed so weird in the beginning " For me the most concerning thing is not the Little Pony references but he says " I AM THE MAN in the relationship " ....I find that view anachronistic
-
@ Meshugger No the future is fine .. but lets clarify something important are you concerned about the future of the West or white men. Or lets say the white race Some people believe there are various overt and covert social and political campaigns and stratagems to marginalize and undermine the white race and I'm not talking about white Aryans. I mean normal white people who are honestly concerned about the future So what ails you so ? You post like a woman, answering questions with questions. Well if you can't clarify what you mean then I can't give you that rosy picture of the future, but things are fine.....the West is fine. Don't worry so much
-
@ Meshugger No the future is fine .. but lets clarify something important are you concerned about the future of the West or white men. Or lets say the white race Some people believe there are various overt and covert social and political campaigns and stratagems to marginalize and undermine the white race and I'm not talking about white Aryans. I mean normal white people who are honestly concerned about the future So what ails you so ?
-
I dont believe the Swedish immigration policy is a disaster, you obviously will believe that because of your anti-EU and anti-Western views. I understand you want the EU to fail but most of us dont want that It has some issues but I won't believe its a disaster until someone who maybe lives in Sweden or the surrounding area can comment..may Rostere or Elerond? Bruce, remind me how are your crime rates in your country again? then please tell me what social/ethnic group is responsible for most of them? Yes but thats because 80 % of the country is black and we have social conditions that exacerbate the overall crime But there is no connection between our crime and the view " black Africans are more inclined to commit crime"
-
I dont believe the Swedish immigration policy is a disaster, you obviously will believe that because of your anti-EU and anti-Western views. I understand you want the EU to fail but most of us dont want that It has some issues but I won't believe its a disaster until someone who maybe lives in Sweden or the surrounding area can comment..may Rostere or Elerond?
-
I don't think SA's current government is interested in tackling issues that it can't blame on white people... No its not that bad ...the government actually leaves us alone
-
Wow, Bruce, a racist remark has never been delivered in such a well-meaning tone Sorry dude...but you know it can't be as bad as South Africa So you have nothing to feel bad about
-
http://rapecrisis.org.za/rape-in-south-africa/ According to the stats its actually higher ...but I would very happy if it was less We have about 50 million people I am sorry, but what the actual F...?! WOW... I am speechless... with the rates we had it should be around 1,800 cases PER YEAR!!! There is something fundamently wrong in your region... and I am willing to assign it to the native populace... WOW.... just WOW.... I know, its not something that makes you feel good..but we are the rape capital of the world Thats why I said earlier , we all become desensitized to how bad it is...otherwise we would all be miserable
-
Which, of course, means these are the reported numbers, and given that rape is one of the most underreported crimes... Yes, but this is relevant for every country, so if you are comparing official data with official data I wasn't aware we were doing that. I'm interested in Hungary's rape stats, I imagine they high as well ?
-
http://rapecrisis.org.za/rape-in-south-africa/ According to the stats its actually higher ...but I would very happy if it was less We have about 50 million people
-
Fighter I have never seen you so confrontational ...and its weird as he is a fellow Russian? End of the day isn't he allowed to say " Russia shouldn't be in Syria " And now everyone is attacking his view ....that can make debate difficult ?
-
While not excusing their actions by any means, it's interesting how people saying something like that forgetting the fact these pilots were dropping bombs on them in the first place. And i've heard reports that they're not even particularly choosy on who they drop them, militants or civilians. In any case, it's a bit hypocritical to expect these people to act differently. "We're dropping bombs on you, but shooting a pilot is just too much!" Really? If you do not understand the basic concept shooting someone unarmed or unable to fight, then i do not know what to tell you except that may God have mercy on your soul. What if God isn't real...who will grant mercy ?
-
But guys killing is wrong, it seems like you guys want to see bloodshed?