BruceVC

Not really, I find you normally opposed to any reasonable SJ initiatives...lets be honest for a moment

Sorry I dont believe thats accurate ....can you provide some links?

GD please continue to point it out when I do it But guys sometimes my point is valid but I need to explain further. Its interesting because I think you guys think my " mandatory apology " law cant be implemented but it can if a culture develops in a country like the USA where through a social movement the majority of citizens decide they tired of the vitriol and personal attacks politicians use against each It wont be legally enforced but it becomes a point of honor where there will a natural acceptance of it as politicians want to keep there constituents happy.Trust me if you know you have to publicly apologize you will probably be careful before accusing people of something...the overall offensive rhetoric should be reduced

No I wouldnt make it mandatory in your example as there are so few examples of that it would be unnecessary Volo this mandatory apology law cannot be used indiscriminately to support some weak social development.....it should only be enforced in extreme cases like Trumpo

I hope Trump now apologizes for calling her a criminal ...it should be mandatory in these types of cases

"" a teleportation portal " Shame thats cute

Vals somehow has the ability to post video links and if its even remotely about any SJ issue I will find it offensive and I'm normally not over sensitive but this video made me laugh.....I watched to the end, it is funny

It sounded ideal actually, sometimes you have a certain plan but change it and its still fun and fulfilled

Oh, okay so it is funny....I suppose we all have different sense of humor

Raithe This joke is awful, do you think our American friends find this funny? Oh and I'm not suggesting you are the only who doesn't understand what Americans find funny....no one ever seems to laugh at my jokes or assumes Im being serious and then sometimes people get really irritated with me And we cant both be unfunny ?

Yes this is the normal comment that someone makes who wishes they had a high IQ, realizes they simply dont but then uses modern technology to distract himself

Hadn't come up. It was drab. Once an American naval ship put in for a visit. To me the Americans looked like pudgy pink piglets. To them we must have looked grey and cadaverous. WOD this is a huge development. I cant believe you only raising this now , this changes or adds context to everything you have said around politics....this is a huge update. You have had debates with our friends in the EU and I always assumed your knowledge was just about Texas but this really adds to the narrative But if its okay I have many questions but not now, do you mind answering questions at a later stage? I don't mind answering questions, but depending on what they are you might PM me, as not everyone may be interested in that kind of exchange. Thanks But I'm not sure why you think this is not interesting to any member who has the even the slightest interest in politics and history I will be very surprised if anyone says " stories about actual life in the USSR dont concern me "

Dont get this? I assume its a joke ....

This story cant be true? Whats wrong with people,if this story is true then the teachers or people who seriously said those things must get fired

Hadn't come up. It was drab. Once an American naval ship put in for a visit. To me the Americans looked like pudgy pink piglets. To them we must have looked grey and cadaverous. WOD this is a huge development. I cant believe you only raising this now , this changes or adds context to everything you have said around politics....this is a huge update. You have had debates with our friends in the EU and I always assumed your knowledge was just about Texas but this really adds to the narrative But if its okay I have many questions but not now, do you mind answering questions at a later stage?

Oh okay, fair enough ...okay I understand now You from French descent but why do you say the Queen is a Nazi? That makes no sense ....what am I missing?

We call this Freedom. WOD I have a suggestion that you have probably considered but then thought it was silly You have always been honest about your issues with the current state of the USA but what your view may be unintentionally missing is maybe you just need a change of scenery for a while. Now I respect your open patriotism to Texas but I am talking about a sabbatical for 6-12 months. But you need to go somewhere like California, somewhere where someone like Hurlshot lives who is positive about the USA I think 12 months living in California will change or maybe lesson some of your negative views? Now tell me honestly, are you stoned right now? I don't need to live in California, I spent first 13 years of my life in the Soviet Union. Drumroll_emoticon.gif No not stoned but I was teasing you, I never knew that ? How come you have never shared that...what was it like

Is that true about the UK? Cananda is part of the Commonwealth and it always adheres to its historical commitments to the UK like when the Queen visits so there is some connection? And the whole slavery accusation is just a distraction, the UK always gets blamed for certain historical things they did. Some people only see the negative I hear this almost everyday, my ancestors came to Africa from the UK and I am accused of slavery, imperialism, colonialism, Apartheid, war-mongering, looting of resources and other things. Now in the history of the UK like every Colonial country yes thats part of the past but the UK has redeemed itself and nowadays is a force of good Why would you be going on about slavery....were your ancestors slaves?

Volo sorry to criticize you on this but you have a real lack of loyalty or respect towards Britain...and you Canadian. Dont you think after everything the UK has done for Canada you could show a little gratitude?

We call this Freedom. WOD I have a suggestion that you have probably considered but then thought it was silly You have always been honest about your issues with the current state of the USA but what your view may be unintentionally missing is maybe you just need a change of scenery for a while. Now I respect your open patriotism to Texas but I am talking about a sabbatical for 6-12 months. But you need to go somewhere like California, somewhere where someone like Hurlshot lives who is positive about the USA I think 12 months living in California will change or maybe lesson some of your negative views?

That is exactly what people say who want people to think they have a high IQ !!!

I would like to get to the bottom of this whole email scandal because many people do share your view and I also want clarity For me if she intentionally deleted data that would incriminate her of course I wouldn't ignore this and I would stop supporting her But the evidence just doesn't support this, now I will go into more details so my point is clear. So take a look at this link and tell me what you dont agree with if you dont mind http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/27/politics/hillary-clinton-personal-email-server/index.html There is no question in my mind she is covering up something criminal. She had those servers professionally wiped. You are more than familiar with IT, you know what that means. And she only did that AFTER she lost in court and was compelled to turn them over. This IS a cover up. No questions about it. Now WHAT is being covered up is a question. I think, my opinion only, the deleted documents refer to donations made to the Clinton Foundation from foreign interests who received favorable treatment from the State Dept during her tenure. Then there is this quote: "But she "has maintained and preserved copies" of work-related, or potentially work-related emails she turned over to the State Department late last year." So we are to accept the word of a potential criminal defendant that the evidence they destroyed was not germane to their case? Only in the Democrat Party would that fly. Here is a homework assignment for you Bruce. Do a little reading about a business called Uranium One and how it came into being and then tell me if you think everything is above board on that. Okay but lets focus on one thing at a time if you dont mind so we can create a foundation of common agreement So based on the link I posted do you agree She handed over 55,000 emails and 30, 000 she said could be for public viewing She also admitted deleting only personal emails which is fine Now I'm not sure if you aware but when people delete data it can normally always be recovered using data recovery software Here is a link explaining this http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/us/politics/investigators-find-emails-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0 So the FBI was able to view all data she attempted to delete and they found nothing incriminating? Professionally wiped Bruce. She didn't "right-click-delete". The data on those servers, that I will remind you was the property of the United States, was professionally destroyed. As for the e-mails she handed over we now have only her word that was all the "work" e-mails she had. Let's say I was the number one suspect in a murder that was committed using a caliber of weapon I was known to own. Now let's I was compelled to surrender that weapon for testing and I fought hard not to do it. And when I did the police found I had replaced the barrel and firing pin. Would that arouse any suspicions? Another thing Bruce, the FBI has made no recommendations yet. This is an ongoing investigation. You seem to think it's all wrapped up. It's not. Okay so just to add something important, I mentioned to you I work with eDiscovery software for living. So we sell, consult and implement this software for corporations mostly in the financial sector. This doesnt make me an expert on what Hilary did and why but I do understand the correct legal and technical requirements So in this case a couple of facts about how these things technically work ...you can decide if they relevant For me, you and about 99 % of the world it would be impossible for us to delete data completely from any disk drive. The reality is there are expensive solutions that can be used to recover most data because there is residual resonance left on the magnetic disk drive or solid state drive always.This is not data that can be read by a PC but for example the best data recovery solutions will freeze a disk in liquid nitrogen and then they can use a laser to recover that data. I have seen this, so unless Hilary knew some hardcore developers or hackers and I mean hardcore any data she deleted thinking it was gone was merely inaccessible to computer technology. But not the FBI who would have been pedantic about getting this back Also the method I mentioned is not 100 % full proof but with email audits you can always see missing data as there are obvious gaps in the sequence of email flow. So for example lets say she didnt delete the data but actually copied if off ( which is always the better way ) the FBI would have noticed certain gaps where there was no email. It is actually obvious when you use software that allows you to see the chain of custody of email flow So in closing I still cannot assume she lied or intentionally deleted data to cover up wrong doing because it would have honestly been recoverable ?

I would like to get to the bottom of this whole email scandal because many people do share your view and I also want clarity For me if she intentionally deleted data that would incriminate her of course I wouldn't ignore this and I would stop supporting her But the evidence just doesn't support this, now I will go into more details so my point is clear. So take a look at this link and tell me what you dont agree with if you dont mind http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/27/politics/hillary-clinton-personal-email-server/index.html There is no question in my mind she is covering up something criminal. She had those servers professionally wiped. You are more than familiar with IT, you know what that means. And she only did that AFTER she lost in court and was compelled to turn them over. This IS a cover up. No questions about it. Now WHAT is being covered up is a question. I think, my opinion only, the deleted documents refer to donations made to the Clinton Foundation from foreign interests who received favorable treatment from the State Dept during her tenure. Then there is this quote: "But she "has maintained and preserved copies" of work-related, or potentially work-related emails she turned over to the State Department late last year." So we are to accept the word of a potential criminal defendant that the evidence they destroyed was not germane to their case? Only in the Democrat Party would that fly. Here is a homework assignment for you Bruce. Do a little reading about a business called Uranium One and how it came into being and then tell me if you think everything is above board on that. Okay but lets focus on one thing at a time if you dont mind so we can create a foundation of common agreement So based on the link I posted do you agree She handed over 55,000 emails and 30, 000 she said could be for public viewing She also admitted deleting only personal emails which is fine Now I'm not sure if you aware but when people delete data it can normally always be recovered using data recovery software Here is a link explaining this http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/us/politics/investigators-find-emails-hillary-clinton-said-were-erased.html?_r=0 So the FBI was able to view all data she attempted to delete and they found nothing incriminating?

I would like to get to the bottom of this whole email scandal because many people do share your view and I also want clarity For me if she intentionally deleted data that would incriminate her of course I wouldn't ignore this and I would stop supporting her But the evidence just doesn't support this, now I will go into more details so my point is clear. So take a look at this link and tell me what you dont agree with if you dont mind http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/27/politics/hillary-clinton-personal-email-server/index.html

This is normally exactly what people say who dont have a high IQ !!! GD dont be a hater Hey, I'm sure mine could boil water.... as long as we're using the right scale! My personal experience with so called high IQ is other types of insights are needed to somehow make it meaningful ...and most so called high IQ people dont have those other insights