BruceVC

Thanks for the link, I am still not convinced in any way that attacks on Asian people by black people is because of white supremacy. Its a choice made by an individual and often it will be directly because of racism, sometimes it may be criminal The link says " So when a Black person attacks an Asian person, the encounter is fueled perhaps by racism, but very specifically by white supremacy. White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it " Thats inaccurate, white supremacy can only consist of white people and not all white people will automatically be welcomed to a group of white supremacists These groups have their own flawed codes based on pseudo-science and what defines a white person But a non-white person who commits bigotry cannot be accused of doing it because of white supremacy because they not white. So we would just call this racism or sexism or homophobia Maybe I am misunderstanding the article so if you can explain what point the professor is making that would be appreciated because I am always interested in these types of debates from people who want to debate the facts and correct definitions of what bigotry is

I didnt read your link when I made post but I will read it now But that wont change the point I am making , their are some people who do say " black people cant be racist " and that is based on a strange view that racism is about power and since, they claim, black people have no power they cant be racist. It illogical and doesnt make sense based on what any bigotry is https://simonesamuels.medium.com/no-black-people-cant-be-racist-eb6fddd18603

Thats something I sometimes come across in South Africa, this absurd notion that only a white person can be racist. Its not widely repeated but I still hear it So in this case the Professor is absolving black people of taking any responsibility for bigotry because " if black person attacks an Asian its a white peoples fault " because black people cant be racist. But they can be sexist, homophobic but somehow not racist. And I think the confusion stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of what racism is? Any human being of any race can demonstrate bigotry. So of course black people can be racist in the same way they can express any other emotion or prejudice. We all the same and suggesting its not true is unintentionally and ironically racist itself

https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-06-14-mediclinic-says-it-did-not-treat-mom-of-thembisa-10-babies-despite-claim-in-text-message-to-childrens-dad/ This fake news story was created in SA that went global and many international media repeated it, the SA news house responsible for this is linked to other fake news stories and so is the specific journalist a man called Piet Rampedi I dont blame the whole media for this but the specific people involved. Their were some South Africans that assumed this was true and even donated money to help the mother .....they are nice people and thought they were dong the right thing and I dislike people being manipulated like this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland_(film) I just watched this movie and its highly recommend. Its tragic, sad but brilliant and captures the reality of the fragility of the human race when it comes to certain natural disasters I know " end of the world " movies can be banal but this is different and its a tear-jerker. Its about a comet that is going to hit the earth that will lead to an extinction level event It reminded me of how despite some of our global differences we really are one race and somethings unite us, and can destroy, as the human race

Hurlshot that sounds dangerously close to being unpatriotic, you know Bethesda is an American company But I want to raise that Fallout 76 has come a long way since its calamitous launch, their have been numerous updates and expansions and the game is really stable and is worth playing now. So we should try not to think of it like it use to be but rather how much it has improved

You make some good points here and I think you have summarized nicely the reality of what many of us think or want when it comes to new games from established gaming companies. I dont think your post is philosophical at all but grounded on the reality of any new game that has a history I cannot tell you what I expect from newly released games, like DA4, because all I know is what I have played and what I enjoy so when it comes to the outcome of creativity I cant comment on what I dont know For example lets take ELEX and how I absolutely loved it, it wasnt because it offered something new. It took what is standard PB gaming design and mechanics and basically improved on it in every level. That is all I want, I dont necessarily want creativity to find a game very entertaining because their is a real paradox when we are expected to ask for something in a game we have never experienced I am not sure if this makes sense ? So I was thinking when it comes to what we expect from the likes of Bioware and other gaming studios it makes more sense to not expect something new but rather what we dont want to see as a feature of the game So the more relevant question we should all ask ourselves is " what do we not want to see from future Bioware games " because that should be the main reason we would or wouldnt support them?

@Gorth Here is a good link around the Chinese economy, it may be a bit technical but its a good view of how it is structured https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/040115/reasons-why-china-buys-us-treasury-bonds.asp#:~:text=Chinese Economics China is primarily a manufacturing hub,the U.S. than the U.S. sells to China.

Its not just RT that had videos of how happy Russia was with the Trump victory, you will find numerous links and videos of how many Russians hoped and believed this would lead to a better US relationship...the sanctions on Russia do matter and do hurt Russia particularly the financial sanctions around certain investments I disagree China will become the strongest economy in the next 10 years, China has an export driven economy and is not consumer driven which is the primary strength of the US economy. So China would have to change its entire economic model to surpass the US but at the moment export driven means people need to buy your goods to be sustainable and sanctions or trade wars with countries that have the most wealth would automatically curtail this like we saw with the recent US\China trade wars and that was just the US using limited sanctions But we dont want a global trade war with China because it will hurt globalization and that will impact all of us and of course it will also hurt the economy of the US and the likes of the EU And please dont misunderstand me, I am not dismissing the strength of China or its global influence in some areas but they dont have the same influence or impact as the combined might of the likes of the US and NATO countries and its unlikely they ever will unless we see a collapse of the economies of these other countries

Thats not completely accurate, Trump on numerous occasions said things like " why do we want to fight with Russia " during his rallies which were about much of his base just parroting and cheering anything he said.....yes the rallies were about theater and his base loved these opportunities for grandstanding. But many of his supporters would agree that " the US doesnt want to fight with Russia " so you could argue there were many Americans who wanted a better relationship with Russia under Trump https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/blakemontgomery/trump-supporters-love-russia-and-think-cnn-and-the-new-york

Seems very anti-Western and is focused on the false narrative or rather a misunderstanding about Bidens reasons for his visit to Russia Biden isnt reaching out to Russia because he fears the Russian\China friendship because its so powerful and the US is concerned it will dominate the world economically. Not at all. Now that the US has assumed its friendships with the likes of the EU and NATO and renewed these alliances this is about giving Russia a chance to change course and become more included in the global community. The economic might of the US and only 2-4 EU countries is greater than the combined economic might of both Russia and China so unequivocally a Russia\China alliance is not about a real threat to global economic hegemony But its better for everyone to include both Russia and China peacefully in the global community without trade wars and sanctions or any unnecessary tension. So Biden is doing the right thing, he is trying the path of diplomacy and inclusivity but its not so much about "breaking the current Russia\China " relationship but rather giving Russia choices and a better way forward I remember when Trump won the election in 2016, I have never seen Russia and its citizens so happy in my life. I was watching parts of RT and they had people celebrating in the streets of Moscow and various Russian news rooms....but I mean really celebrating and if you know Russians they dont often celebrate. And do you know why they were celebrating? Because they believed a Trump victory would be better for Russia with its relationship with the US and would lead to sanctions being dropped and I understand this and dont blame them. Watch this video if their is any doubt that Russia would much rather have a good and productive relationship with the US

Yes, that is correct. Certain NATO members have never committed their 2% but Trump raised this vociferously, publicly and as you said undiplomatically. What I observed during Trumps presidency is certain NATO members and US politicians have since the end of the Cold War questioned why you even need NATO. It has some legitimacy that view because NATO was created specifically to counter the USSR But the outcome of a lack of real unity between the US and NATO members have been an increase in Russian "soft " aggression like the numerous and consistent examples of cyber-warfare and the increased aggression of China in its own objectives around hegemony in the east and its own region So NATO is relevant again but not because their will be another war but its a good symbol of the important alliance of the US and its NATO allies. And this is clearly necessary to restrain China and Russia which can and should become normal members of the global community. But its also clear this can only be done from a position of strength and not the Trump approach where he basically admired various strongmen and autocratic rulers throughout the world

https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2020/10/21/10-NATO-countries-now-spending-2-of-GDP-on-defense-report-shows/7731603295420/ Its a legitimate complaint from the USA because all NATO members are suppose to spend 2% of GDP on NATO but not all member states do and not all still do. So this is not just a GOP issue, their was an agreement and countries are suppose to adhere to it so Trump was right when he raised this But the reality is without the USA NATO lacks the ability to hold Russia, and other countries, in check but also NATO is how the US is able to implement certain geopolitical decisions that benefit the objectives around its own foreign policy Trump raised the failure of NATO members to pay the 2% in a way that was belligerent, condescending and all it did was alienate the US traditional allies that the US needs for different objectives Thats why Biden is prudently reestablishing the NATO alliance, its in the best interests of everyone but the US will always be the biggest funder in the same way the US is by far the biggest funder of the UN and all its important institutions that benefit the world and help ensure a better and Democratic world US isolationism doesnt help anyone and only emboldens the likes of China and Russia who start acting with impunity

Yeah it sux when you want to share some good news about a game and someone else posts it first

Okay I see what you saying, its just their are different types of autocratic states and not all of them deny freedom in the same way. For example you could be left alone to live in the wilderness in a country like Turkmenistan but you wouldnt be able to vote without intimidation or criticize the leadership So it depends which autocratic country you live in, China is not the worst ( NK is is much worse for example ) but it limits certain freedoms but you could own property and be wealthy in China as long as you dont go against the state

What about a semi-Autocratic state, would you live their instead of fighting to the death? For example lets say the US was colonized by China and the CCP shipped US citizens to different countries based on the state they lived in. It was decided that the citizens of Tennessee would be sent to Turkmenistan ...would you accept that as its not a true autocratic state ?

Good point about the problem with overusing microtransactions and the philosophy of using them in games...lets hope this isnt a part of DA4 or ME4. But I cant see how they would be implemented successfully in a single player game?

Good question. I wanted to Romance Nasty, because she was hotter and fun, but I found her usage of constant profanity very un-ladylike and off putting. She also annoyed me with her lack of any emotional discussion So I settled with Caja....I enjoyed her personality but I wasnt really attracted to her but Jax isnt exactly a Romeo so I ignored the whole lack of real attraction I hope they create different character models because as Comrade pointed out they did reuse the same characters models which happens sometimes to keep costs down I enjoyed killing Logan at the end because he had an attitude problem

Wormie you make a reasonable argument about the future of Bioware games and you investing in them. So you looking for creativity as what you expect from Bioware ....but what do you define as creativity ? The reason I ask is I have no issue with playing a particular game if it has the same design and mechanics as previous games if I enjoyed them. So I believe in the mantra " if its not broken, no need to fix it " . However I am always prepared to try something new from any recognized gaming company especially if I have played and enjoyed games from that company But what specifically are you expecting from Bioware, I know its a difficult question but we cant expect Bioware to deliver on objectives if we cannot articulate them ourselves ?

Oh my hat, this post wins the " BruceVC best post of the month " award , you very fortunate because fame and fortune always follow those that win this prestigious nomination so well done Coincidently I just finished ELEX 1 last night and its the best game from Piranha Bytes I have ever played and I loved the Gothic and Risen series I was just asking on the ELEX Steam forums if there will be an ELEX 2 and people werent sure ....now we know their will be. Day 1 purchase for sure

https://www.pcgamer.com/uk/biowares-new-general-manager-promises-to-rebuild-its-reputation/ Some good news around Bioware, it now has a new permanent GM who has over 20 years in the gaming industry and has said its " all about rebuilding that reputation, and delivering on that promise of quality " Personally I dont think Bioware needs to rebuild its reputation as I like and support their games but I can appreciate his statement. Hopefully that should convince many forum members to give Bioware another chance with upcoming games like DA4 Because " the more the merrier " when it comes to generating revenue for any sales orientated company

Sure I concur, their are tons of people who find authoritarian governments more attractive but yet they dont actually live in these countries and normally live in liberal, Democracies that have advanced economies based on the working and successful free market principles ( Capitalism ) and repeat this false narrative on the Internet But actions speak louder then words so when we see mass immigration to these great authoritarian countries I will agree with you

Hoonding please dont demonstrate unnecessary GOP bashing, their is no guarantee that we will see another Trump candidate Yes I share your concern with another Trumpish type US president but remember we have seen many excellent GOP presidents in the history of the USA and I still believe that we will see another GOP president that espouses the traditional values of the GOP which many of us appreciate

Comrade, its unpatriotic to not support NATO if you a US citizen !!! Its traditional as apple pie and cream for the US and I am sure you like apple pie and cream ?

I started watching Lucifer again, I am on season 1 and previously I only got to episode 3 and then for some reason I stopped watching it ...its fun and entertaining. I wont say excellent but its worthwhile