Malcador

Not sure that latter group bothers with small steps after so many years. Also I like the Flyers logo there, this was obviously taken by a Penguins fan.

Sat out on front step with my dog, took what I think is a very good photo of him. High point of today

Pretty far way to go, if so.

And if they work for NSA- whose purpose is to subvert others/ protect US communications/ internet etc- then you'd be right to since their technical security is very good, and has to be very good. If on the other hand they work for Hillary Rodham Clinton or the DNC chances are they're grossly incompetent (but not grossly negligent) rather than elite and their security is very very bad to the extent it barely exists for the former case. Technically, Bush withdrew from the ABM rather than outright abrogated it. Whether that has any effect on the legitimacy of a President doing it by fiat rather than via senate I have no idea, but he didn't simply tear the agreement up one day and tell the Russians to suck it. He activated the withdrawal clause, withdrew after its notice period, then told the Russians to suck it. Not necessarily. Sysadmin doesn't necessitate development, could though. Outside of things with NSA, headlines on Snowden says... are still funny. I wonder how much money his new phone case will make though.

Really? I work with a bunch of lecherous 50 year olds. Tiresome to hear how hot the coffee shop girl is. I mean it is true, but come on.

Well patch either made the Eldar not moronic or I got lucky. Onward with the campaign!

Better go tell my sysadmin buddies how elite they really are.

Hilarious. Snowden actually commented and stated that if Russia were responsible, the US government would know and it wouldn't be "speculation," suggesting (big surprise) Russia isn't behind this. Trump believing the very media rigged in Hillary's favor is priceless though. An aside, but the faith in Snowden's anything is sort of funny. Please explain what reason anyone has to distrust anything said by Snowden. The man got in trouble because he showed integrity and transparency when the government did not. Well for example your example from him. Also for some, granted the scum on reddit, he is like a god when it comes to anything on security yet Scheier is a nobody. Not quite sure he has shown transparency. Mostly as what does he have to be transparent about. Whether you agree or disagree with his actions does not give cause for not trusting him at his word. You've not named an example not to trust him beyond "when he was entrusted with withholding information that the American public knew nothing of and would be upset about if they knew, he told them." That? That's a very particular type of trust that was broken, and by no means representative of a bold-faced liar. In other news, Jane Sanders gives great insight to what she and Bernie were aiming for and thinking as they endorsed Hillary. Not quite sure I need a reason to 'not' trust anyone. But as I've mentioned already, it's him being treated as an authority on things I'm not quite sure he is due.

I dunno. I feel the need for that just from meeting one. Anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.

Dealing with retarded ally AI in BFG. Gave up on that mission.

Ah, to be 12 again.

Hilarious.Snowden actually commented and stated that if Russia were responsible, the US government would know and it wouldn't be "speculation," suggesting (big surprise) Russia isn't behind this. Trump believing the very media rigged in Hillary's favor is priceless though. An aside, but the faith in Snowden's anything is sort of funny. Please explain what reason anyone has to distrust anything said by Snowden. The man got in trouble because he showed integrity and transparency when the government did not. Well for example your example from him. Also for some, granted the scum on reddit, he is like a god when it comes to anything on security yet Scheier is a nobody. Not quite sure he has shown transparency. Mostly as what does he have to be transparent about.

Hilarious. Snowden actually commented and stated that if Russia were responsible, the US government would know and it wouldn't be "speculation," suggesting (big surprise) Russia isn't behind this. Trump believing the very media rigged in Hillary's favor is priceless though. An aside, but the faith in Snowden's anything is sort of funny.

Something odd about attending church packing heat.

Kind of unfair to them to think about it that way.What do you mean?Just that the reasons for lack of reporting are the same for no one knowing of another killer. Also, doubt the police are going to advertise that kind of information. In an odd way these radical mosques are useful to hang around, flame for moths. I know Britain used them in such a way, leave the imam alone and just watch people coming to him.

Kind of unfair to them to think about it that way.

And now some idiot shot a doctor and then himself in Berlin

Seems like typical OTT stuff for that subreddit.

See Thanksgiving.

Some people deserve beatings by cops.

We need moderation by combat

Well what exactly can Brazile do now? Clinton already has it.

Context of an alliance means those are the same. Silly people gotta remember to not use emails for anything shady

Yeah, they must be 'phobic to criticism' or it might just be you're a total ****.

People who have a rather simplistic view of the world or are racists for a good chunk.