Wrath of Dagon

Btw, our old friend CAIR again : http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/18/muslim-groups-seek-to-co-opt-ferguson-protests-says-watchdog-group/

I haven't defended this particular mosque in any way, I know little about it and don't live anywhere near Brooklyn. Would you condemn all churches because one has members of the KKK? You seem pretty quick to do that with Islam. Show me one place where I condemned all mosques or all Islam. In fact I've done the opposite several times. Go back and read the posts you made about me in the other thread, may be you'll figure it out.

Yeah, there is a terrorist mosque in Brooklyn after all, it's not all a product of my fevered xenophobic imagination as you think. But good reading comprehension, what does it take to be a California teacher exactly? Everybody in the Brooklyn Mosque is a terrorist? That would be super convenient for the FBI. I wonder if several high officials in a church were members of the KKK if you would defend that church as "not everybody in the church is a member of the KKK".

The guy might have visited a mosque in Brooklyn once? *gasp* Yeah, there is a terrorist mosque in Brooklyn after all, it's not all a product of my fevered xenophobic imagination as you think. But good reading comprehension, what does it take to be a California teacher exactly?

I should be the one laughing, as you seem to think collecting intelligence isn't one of the functions of an intelligence agency. Of course given that most of the British intelligence agents were actually Soviet spies, in that case you're right, they already knew whatever they needed to know.

So people who were laughing and clapping and people who called for the murder of policemen during demonstrations were all mentally unstable? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/12/20/nypd-shooting-eyewitness-people-clapping-and-laughing-after-killings/ This is the atmosphere that Obola, Sharpton and De Blasio helped to create with their lies and incitement. Edit: Oh, and this is for Hurlshot : http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/12/20/did-cop-killer-ishmael-brinsley-visit-terror-tied-brooklyn-mosque/

What other people?

He can race bait until he encourages the murder of policemen though.

By that argument why gather intelligence at all, if the problem is too much information? Your examples are disinformation, not the same thing is unreliable information. It would be pretty hard to get someone to maintain a planted story when subject to enhanced interrogation. Most intelligence information is unreliable, that's why it is difficult. Lots of people who knew what was going on said that intelligence collected was useful, a politicized partisan report by Senate Democrats who were already on record with their opinions before any investigation was done and who didn't even talk to most of the people involved doesn't prove anything.

According to you, they already moved in next door and built a nice shiny mosque. Yes they did. You can bury you head in the sand all you want.

Most intelligence info isn't reliable. The point is to get info so it can be cross checked against other info or to develop other info. Unreliable info is still better than none.

IS is going to come knocking at your door.

Retreat and surrender are daily occurrence under our Dear Leader Obola.

If the article is too shallow for you, though I thought it had interesting and important things to say about common culture, here's another one : http://deshcalling.blogspot.com/2013/01/spenglers-ominous-prophecy.html

This reminds me, if you want to see that for yourself : http://www.battlefront.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=335&Itemid=579 Btw, they started developing this game long before the current events in Ukraine, just like their previous game about a war in Syria was done long before the actual war in Syria.

Well, the article isn't really about that, but I think gives some insight into the dangers of "Do what thou wilt" culture. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/16/science/a-meditation-on-the-art-of-not-trying.html?src=me&_r=2

They don't know what the reason was for the police shooting, people who are suicidal sometimes kill others also.

Except Bruce can't commit anybody for anything. And judging the sanity of people on the internet isn't a bad idea at all.

That's exactly what I expected you to say, and of course you never answered my question. As far as free higher education, there is already all kinds of financial aid and loans available for people who can't afford it, especially for minorities. Also nothing is free, someone's paying for it, the top 20% percentile is paying virtually all the income tax in the US already. In fact, the huge influx of government aid into higher education is what makes it so expensive.

It wasn't a murder, it was an accident. What would you do in that situation? If you're willing to work, all doors are open. People come here with nothing, and in a generation they're in the elite. What other country can you say that about?

If a guy is resisting arrest, the cops have no choice but to subdue him. What else are they supposed to do? They could've beaten him with billy clubs, but that would've been worse. They could've tasered him if they had tasers, but he might've died from that. They actually chose the least violent form of arrest. As far as several piling on, how else are you supposed to restrain a 300 pound man? How were they supposed to know how sick he was?

Yes, because Nouri al-Maliki was so desperate to have US troops stay! He was chasing after Obama on hands and knees begging rather than offering to pack their bags and see them off from the airport while bouncing up and down with anticipation! No, he wasn't. You weren't going to get troops staying because it wasn't what Maliki wanted. Both parties had to want the troops to stay and the Iraqis didn't want them, if they had they would have simply extended the old SoF. And if Obama had pushed strongly for an extension and failed it would be used as evidence of his failure (had to go on bended knee to Iraq then got rejected) and if he had accepted more restrictive conditions then he'd be criticised for that (went on bended knee and sold our guys out for Maliki/ didn't do enough/ broke his promise to withdraw). Of course having US stay would be a political problem for Maliki, and he was getting pressured by the like of Al Sadr and Iran. Nor would we ever allow having our troops put under Iraqi jurisdiction. But most knowledgeable people believe an agreement could have been reached, and certainly no one's ever accused Obola of doing his utmost, or utilizing all the tools at his disposal, as he did when he got Maliki to resign for example. Edit: Btw, most people forget, or never found out, that in 2008 Obola ran on getting out of Iraq immediately, then re-invading if Al Qaeda ever came back. Well, it looks like he's getting his wish.

By most accounts, including Leon Panetta's, Obola went through the motions but didn't try very hard to reach an agreement: http://www.newsweek.com/panettas-memoir-blasts-obama-his-leadership-blames-him-state-iraq-and-syria-276582 He was so ambivalent and disengaged often our negotiators didn't even know what our position was. Later he sometimes took credit for getting our troops out of Iraq and sometimes blamed Iraqis for the very same thing, whichever suited him at the moment. He also famously lied about what our position on the status of forces agreement was in the debate with Mitt Romney, though very few of our ignoramus media and voters noticed at the time.

The butthurt is strong with this one. A few left-leaning states voted as expected, this is supposed to prove something? True raising the minimum wage is fairly popular, but mostly only people earning the minimum wage feel strongly about it. And as we have seen, states that want it are perfectly capable of doing it for themselves, it doesn't have to be done at the federal level. WOD when do you think Texas will legalize Marijuana for recreational use? I imagine this will take some time as I consider Texas conservative when it comes to these types of issues? Hopefully never. I'd say at least not for 10 years. And there is no dichotomy, Federal law supersedes state, so marijuana is still illegal in all 50 states, the current administration just chooses to ignore the law, as they do in so many other cases.