Skarpen

Nice try spinning this around as Gromnir were the one who didn't realize that "everyone who..". doesn't mean "every". If Gromnir only meets people in the bar or on internet mb then it's really sad. But let Gromnir imagine that people can have different life experience and meet various people. I know this will go over Gromnir head like every point made ever. As for who I would ask if something is chargeable or not I would say that I would ask practicing attorney or an actual prosecutor. And I would only need to ask one person as people with law degree in Poland actually know the law. Unlike apparently USA where they will let anyone be in justice system even people that don't know what a case file is 😂

There is more about this on Project Veritas website. Seems like google wants to meddle in US election. Disgraceful.

Every who... doesn't mean every. For example: every member who writes in third person is ovnoxious doesn't mean every member is obnoxious only the ones that writes in third person. Case papers as the name suggests are papers for the case. You know the pieces of cellulose with ink on them in the shape of letters. Seems pretty simple to me. Oh well. Of course experts are great thing to rely on in most cases. Like how to produce scotch or bourbon or if the bumblebee is physically able to fly. Which the latter was by experts deemed impossible regardless of the clear evidence that they do fly. But in this case the question is is there a prosecutor who would go to court with a particular case. For me it's reverse bumblebee argument where experts claim someone like this exist but in reality there is no such person at least till now.

They sound like every retired militaryman who "would win every war" and retired policemen who "would solve every crime" etc. if only they were younger. It would be funny to watch how quickly would they back off if someone would give them the case papers and say - ok, bring this before the judge. It's like Einstein said when he was asked about a group of scientists that wanted to disprove his theory: - if the theory was wrong one guy would be sufficient. The same here. You can get millions of people claiming this can be done and still be wrong. Because what you need is find one actual guy that will do it.

Of course I knew, I even used it in a sentence which triggered your "woke" comment, remember? Because both the Buffett quote and his secretary name are publicly known for years now.

I'm very confident Debbie Bosanek is a woman.

Still confused how someone can miss the point by so much. Oh well...

We all know how this works. It's still not the point.

Probably yeah, but I guess neither applied to make it.

Fixed. And reported, I will not be idle to harassment. I was under the impression the problem was tax rate not how much he pays because of income differences. Those are two different things. If person A pays 10% from 10.000$ and person B pays 20% from 4000$ doesn't mean person B has lower tax rate. That's a different discussion altogether.

Wouldn't it be better for the secretary to change her tax rate to match Buffett's rather than other way around?

I will buy day one when it releases on Steam or GoG.

I like to play anti-hero or a villain in the games that actually let's you be one interestingly.

I don't think there is coordinated attack on CDPR, it seem like the usual case of attention seekers loving to be offended on someone else behalf.

Must be Morgan Freeman fans.

And we're back on the high horse snarking on the peasants below. Good luck with that attitude. You must be helluva fun at parties.

Sounds fun, but CDP probably gave to many bucks to Reeves to make him an optional content.

I don't see your point. What voters numbers have to do with anything I said? And where did I say anything about new political movement? I referenced Obama and political strategy that goes way back to middle ages. And Trump running a smarter campaign goes without saying. He won, its obvious. My post was more about why not how. And can we please drop this sharp bs? It's creepy. Ok. I don't know what you did say in the past. I'm new here. But if you know all that then why ask what you asked? A little confusing.

What a bunch of whiners.

If Trump critics would get off their high horse for a short time to actually try to speak to Trump base without contempt or animosity they could find out easily the answer to "Why Trump?" question. His base is not young kids for whom this is a first rodeo. They've been around for Obama, Bush, Clinton, other Bush, Reagan, some surely remember Reagan and Carter. Argument that Trump' a liar is ridiculous to them. They know all politicians are liars. Pointing to them that a politician is a liar is like arguing to a beekeeper "don't pick those bee's they sting". Well of course they sting those are bee's. The point is how good honey they make. People voted for Trump for the same basic reason Afroamericans voted for Obama. They think he is their guy and he have their back. Even if he fails to deliver on his promises he can always blame the deep state and opposition. That they are restraining him from doing more good for the people. It's the old story of Good Tsar and bad Boyars. You can look it up. Maybe this would shed some light for you.

I think AoE2HD also have those. I don't remember if original had those but the option to buy reseeds (up to 15 I think) is present right now.

It seems CDP Red hired some starpower for Cyberpunk

Well the last US president that sold us to USSR was a democrat, so we are betting on a second party right now. And it seems Trump cares about security in the region and is willing to increase US Troops stationed in Poland. So yeah there's that. And unlike the previous asshat in the WH Trump knows there were no polish deathcamps and that nazis were german, so that works for him as a cherry on top.