As I said in the previous post, we can take a different point at semantics. We know what type of actions constitute murder. Hence, if we take all those actions, and no longer make them illegal (which after the fact would abolish murder from the legal system), you seem to be okay with all those actions. Since they'd no longer be against the Law.
It turns out it was necessary, because when I mention if it wasn't against the law to kill someone, you somehow figured I was talking specifically about the what we now consider "lawful killing" i.e. executions.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What you fail to understand, and this is not a dodge, that the definition of murder is in fact an unlawful act.