Fighter

It's ok they have the white privilege.

"Cyber Violence". They are not talking about getting teabagged in CoD are they? Ok... You know how when you watch a movie about the future and they've got some deliberately ridiculous concept there cause it's the future and look how alien it is? Like "pre-crime" or "sense offenders" (Equilibrium). We are there now.

He is talking about interviewing TotalBiscuit. The funny thing Russ Pitts is so very far from being any kind of sympathetic to GG. But you even talk to the wrong person and SJW-Ben will cut you off like the westboro baptist church cuts off apostates.

I've heard it's for multiplayer.

I bet she owns a ****. EDIT: Really? That's censored too? I meant a big plastic p___ in case you're wondering.

Perks of gaming is that we could do that too.

This happens to me all the time. I've barely played anything the whole summer. But eventually I end up going on a gaming binge.

I've seen by this time hundreds probably. The entire hashtag was once completely filled with people condemning harassment. The other side on the other hand has a real problem accepting that the "progressives" or *gasp* feminists are capable of such. It is most especially visible in sjw infested media where they think "progressive" sh** doesn't stink. Where you will never see anything outside the approved victim narrative that has the approved victim and perpetrator.

I didn't know they were making a Ghost in the Shell game.

Well wanting a big P or big DDs are rather conventional and the appeal understandable. Roleplaying a pedophile is way deeper down the rabbit hole.

Maybe because I am not an "edgelord" but the stuff in her logs doesn't come off as a joke. But I am also not the police or a mind reader. However I don't think it is a reasonable expectation to think that anyone who had discovered this should just shut up and never bring it up. Because victimhood privileges or something. You can't expect this not to be an issue. If the story about her computer never being actually confiscated is true it would give some credence to "I was making it all up" story. Speaking of police. There isn't necessarily anything strictly illegal that she can be prosecuted for. Especially if the family doesn't want to go through with it. The reaction to all this from the sj clique is pretty telling however as usual. These are the type of people who would push to destroy lives and careers for the flimsiest of "sexist" remarks. They would certainly never let anyone from gamergate of the hook. They still rant at gamergate about childporn on 8chan that has nothing to do with gamergate. Not to mention the desperate attempts to claim gamergate made everything up when it was always clear it wasn't fake. As usual nothing to do with fairness or objectivity, just the sacred narrative that cannot be questioned. And finally in regards to Sarah's edgy and fringe behavior, regardless if she was genuine or not. It would be telling that she ended up a SJW. She would just have evolved to a currently permissible form of "edgelord" trolling. To where instead of white supremacy (as she did in the logs) you can now crap on people for "my soggy knees" and it's perfectly safe. PS. Milo and Breitbart are situational allies. Plus he is an actual amusing edgelord. PSS. Regarding gamergate and agg being the same. I think GG overall has a far greater capacity to criticize itself than they do. I think one would have far more luck in getting gamergaters to admit wrong doing on their end -- even if they aren't ready to drop everything to save the damsels.

I don't appreciate the gloating in GG about it or Milo's dumb pedo jokes. Would rather it would be handled somberly with no unnecessary drama. But the complete denial of uncomfortable information is the other thing that made me lose any faith in the 'social justice' clique. These are the same people that jump on 'offensive' jokes at the faintest pretext. But Nyberg being an absolute creep, even if it were a joke (and it even remotely doesn't come off as a joke), and suddenly: The least they can do is not say anything. So much for fairness and social justice.

In a perfect world being so hilariously caught with their pants down would teach them a lesson and force to express some humility. But they are crazy and those who aren't let them run free completely unchallenged. I've never been of a lower opinion about their "progressive" clique than I am these past few day. These people who are well spoken and write articles and give talks and sit on panels and go on TV... time and time again just... I don't even know how to describe it... would become these unreal caricatures instead of admitting the sky is blue because they've been saying it's pink.

Yep. His alter egos even argued with each other.

Another thing. I've got my own issues with Milo. But... Aaaaaaaaaaahahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111 Also this is about ethics in journalism.

GG happening is just some kind of dark comedy now and not real life. So there is some kind of crazy troll that was arrested for terrorism because he impersonated a jihadi on twitter and made suggestions to perform a terrorist act. Turns out this guy, using another alter ego, made some pro GG posts using the hashtag. So naturally Brianna Wu jumped on it. ...because of course she did. Others did too. Because... of course they did. And then in a specular fit of cosmic irony we find that this guy had another alter ego named Tanya Cohen who Brianna Wu followed on twitter, exchanged DMs with, and who wrote this: Click! I don't even know how is this real life anymore. They are a parody of themselves and we are living in their movie. Edit: "Actually it's about ethics in games journalism" ~ BW And the irony flows like a torrent.

NSFW (language). http://postimg.org/image/ks5ugxc89/

The important thing is if you want to make it. But now I am curious, so go ahead I want to read it.

Is there really any "Arkham style" combat system that's remotely challenging? Someone has to come up with one.

Sure. https://archive.is/DdNpk