So the lead is only 15% if you actually use 64-bit Windows. BTW, I've switched back to 32-bit XP yet again, after my 3rd stint in x64. There is simply no advantage and lots of little quirks.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Indeed and that synthetic bench is further reduced from a 6% difference in actual performance with the AMD architecture. the fact is that Conroe is a great 32-bit CPU ... problem is we're on the verge of a 64 bit shift. So AMD - with the AM3 4x4 - continues to push Intel to keep up ... or so that's my take
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think AMD has grown strong throughout the years of progress. Intel is having problems keeping up IMO. Besides, it's always AMD that comes up with the bright ideas: 64 bit, Dual Core, Quad Core ecc.
The 64 bit system is now used to transfer data more securely and better. It's more advanced, makes less noise, has very good performance (not as much as some 32 bit CPU that go over 3 Ghz of course...), consumes less (in this case for portable computers) and is much cooler.