s13ep

Good lord is there a giant [citation needed] hanging over that one. The people who can't deal with it are the problem, not the people who do it. Really? But we have to walk into social circles that judge us by our immediate image ( as in interviews ), our immediate image is stupidity... All this multicolored tint stuff going about right now is going to annoy me, if it wasn't for the good speech from someone smart, it wouldn't have turned out so great for homosexuals. I'd have to walk among jokes, the pressures have been explained before by me ( it was a house at the time, now it's ruins ), it's not so easy to tackle pressures and there are arguments saying most psychological problems are social born.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3blsm4/ask_lucifer_the_light_bringer_anything/

If you think that argument bit more you find that it really don't hold any closer scrutiny. And even if we leave all sense, logic and decently behind us, how do you even begin to plan actual isolation of population group which members can born to any family in any social, economical, ethnic, religious, cultural, etc. group that there are and they don't have any visible marks or clear test that would reveal their sexual orientation. And in this your isolation system do bisexual had to decide between living with other people or living isolation or is it based on some random system? I don't think it's possible, but if they stopped advertising this rainbow low caliber clothing 'style of gay', and forcing down our throats with sad stories and aggressive feminine ( but from a male ) attitudes, making us all look like an abomination. I'd have no problem, not even patronizing homosexuality, if the majority of them stopped being this stupid. They can live happily without a lisp, they can live happily without feminine acting. It's not a thing that comes with gay, feminine acting and general sexual stupidity ( promoting it like porn in daylight - "I'm here in daylight because I have sex with men, and there's hundreds of us, you should join in" ). To be honest, all emotions aside for a second, it's unnecessary and making us look weak and abnormal, begging for combat. It's also provocative for a lot of people are homophobic and it's even broadcast now. They get so much attention, they've reached the peak now surely. I would HATE to see it carry on from this point, gay-pride, but sure be gay. Out of curiosity, how many gay people have you actually met in person? Because I've met a couple handfuls and none of them acted like the popular TV / pride parade stereotype. In fact, most of them hated the stereotype much more vehemently than you do. My uncle is homosexual and I'm bisexual, and I've met straight acting gays. I don't mean to be insulting, as bad as it sounds... Gay pride causes problems for people who want to be civil and normal, unique, acting, who perhaps have, what I find peace calling, "abnormal sexuality". Okay fair enough...but I still don't get your objection to Pride? Are you saying people don't like Gay Pride because of the all the theatrics and people acting silly ? Yes. My second reason is that gay is educated ( which I can't confirm, but take over "there is no answer", with all the other answers ). Interesting enough I use to have this exact same debate with a good gay friend of mine who refused to go to Pride..he said he felt the gay people made a mockery of themselves and all it did was great homophobia because people would look at the TV and see all these weird people in wedding dresses acting stupid I felt he was wrong and said to him that anyone who sees Pride on TV and judges the gay people are homophobic anyway so there is no need to worry about those people ...Pride is about the symbolism that it is okay to be gay..and we should celebrate it due to all the homophobia in the world And when all the homophobia is suppressed to an extent, Gay Pride carries on as a sort of clubbers event. The people behind it aren't as beautiful minded as the concept.

If you think that argument bit more you find that it really don't hold any closer scrutiny. And even if we leave all sense, logic and decently behind us, how do you even begin to plan actual isolation of population group which members can born to any family in any social, economical, ethnic, religious, cultural, etc. group that there are and they don't have any visible marks or clear test that would reveal their sexual orientation. And in this your isolation system do bisexual had to decide between living with other people or living isolation or is it based on some random system? I don't think it's possible, but if they stopped advertising this rainbow low caliber clothing 'style of gay', and forcing down our throats with sad stories and aggressive feminine ( but from a male ) attitudes, making us all look like an abomination. I'd have no problem, not even patronizing homosexuality, if the majority of them stopped being this stupid. They can live happily without a lisp, they can live happily without feminine acting. It's not a thing that comes with gay, feminine acting and general sexual stupidity ( promoting it like porn in daylight - "I'm here in daylight because I have sex with men, and there's hundreds of us, you should join in" ). To be honest, all emotions aside for a second, it's unnecessary and making us look weak and abnormal, begging for combat. It's also provocative for a lot of people are homophobic and it's even broadcast now. They get so much attention, they've reached the peak now surely. I would HATE to see it carry on from this point, gay-pride, but sure be gay. Out of curiosity, how many gay people have you actually met in person? Because I've met a couple handfuls and none of them acted like the popular TV / pride parade stereotype. In fact, most of them hated the stereotype much more vehemently than you do. My uncle is homosexual and I'm bisexual, and I've met straight acting gays. I don't mean to be insulting, as bad as it sounds... Gay pride causes problems for people who want to be civil and normal, unique, acting, who perhaps have, what I find peace calling, "abnormal sexuality". Okay fair enough...but I still don't get your objection to Pride? Are you saying people don't like Gay Pride because of the all the theatrics and people acting silly ? Yes. My second reason is that gay is educated ( which I can't confirm, but take over "there is no answer", with all the other answers ).

If you think that argument bit more you find that it really don't hold any closer scrutiny. And even if we leave all sense, logic and decently behind us, how do you even begin to plan actual isolation of population group which members can born to any family in any social, economical, ethnic, religious, cultural, etc. group that there are and they don't have any visible marks or clear test that would reveal their sexual orientation. And in this your isolation system do bisexual had to decide between living with other people or living isolation or is it based on some random system? I don't think it's possible, but if they stopped advertising this rainbow low caliber clothing 'style of gay', and forcing down our throats with sad stories and aggressive feminine ( but from a male ) attitudes, making us all look like an abomination. I'd have no problem, not even patronizing homosexuality, if the majority of them stopped being this stupid. They can live happily without a lisp, they can live happily without feminine acting. It's not a thing that comes with gay, feminine acting and general sexual stupidity ( promoting it like porn in daylight - "I'm here in daylight because I have sex with men, and there's hundreds of us, you should join in" ). To be honest, all emotions aside for a second, it's unnecessary and making us look weak and abnormal, begging for combat. It's also provocative for a lot of people are homophobic and it's even broadcast now. They get so much attention, they've reached the peak now surely. I would HATE to see it carry on from this point, gay-pride, but sure be gay. Out of curiosity, how many gay people have you actually met in person? Because I've met a couple handfuls and none of them acted like the popular TV / pride parade stereotype. In fact, most of them hated the stereotype much more vehemently than you do. My uncle is homosexual and I'm bisexual, and I've met straight acting gays. I don't mean to be insulting, as bad as it sounds... Gay pride causes problems for people who want to be civil and normal, unique, acting, who perhaps have, what I find peace calling, "abnormal sexuality".

If you think that argument bit more you find that it really don't hold any closer scrutiny. And even if we leave all sense, logic and decently behind us, how do you even begin to plan actual isolation of population group which members can born to any family in any social, economical, ethnic, religious, cultural, etc. group that there are and they don't have any visible marks or clear test that would reveal their sexual orientation. And in this your isolation system do bisexual had to decide between living with other people or living isolation or is it based on some random system? I don't think it's possible, but if they stopped advertising this rainbow low caliber clothing 'style of gay', and forcing down our throats with sad stories and aggressive feminine ( but from a male ) attitudes, making us all look like an abomination. I'd have no problem, not even patronizing homosexuality, if the majority of them stopped being this stupid. They can live happily without a lisp, they can live happily without feminine acting. It's not a thing that comes with gay, feminine acting and general sexual stupidity ( promoting it like porn in daylight - "I'm here in daylight because I have sex with men, and there's hundreds of us, you should join in" ). To be honest, all emotions aside for a second, it's unnecessary and making us look weak and abnormal, begging for combat. It's also provocative for a lot of people are homophobic and it's even broadcast now. They get so much attention, they've reached the peak now surely. I would HATE to see it carry on from this point, gay-pride, but sure be gay.

Homosexuals enjoy their gay pride, isolation would be like a holiday.

Reproduction rates are only vital in so far as the village population { i.e. a flock of birds, to a country full of birds }. If the whole country's reproduction rates are too high we will overpopulate, thus we don't have everyone reproducing, for that would be silly. Instead, we have balanced reproduction occurring in the village populations { near equal amount of males and females }. We may spend our whole lives thinking we're a country but most of us only interact with nearby people... It's the village population that matters. I disagree with homosexuality in media, and homosexual promotion to non-homosexuals. We don't know much about why homosexuality occurs, and many homosexuals would cling onto any answer even if they didn't know. However, homosexuals don't make a choice, and homosexuals deserve human rights; just not sanctification above or equal to heterosexuals. I am someone who believes homosexuals should be isolated, together, with possible blending with society just secretive. I'm unsure about how it would work out but isolation does work.

There's always the conspiracy theories thread. What I write is like ruins, more so than a house, because it's destructive of a personality that's enjoyable in a non-religious sense. We like nihilism, in games, in stories, in social circles, but I'd hate it if the world became truly nihilistic - like, South Africa conditions. I could write perfectly antipodal, even justify my text, this would have a more profound effect.

I'm interested in this topic at the moment. Nihilism in society and, what I think the source is, scientific nihilism. It's a big conspiracy.

To be honest, do not show weakness about these people ( depressive ). An act of kindness is pounced upon and inverted ( color-wise ). I may have said before, but "two wrongs don't make a right, so what does two rights make? A greater right, a greater good. All it takes is someone to pick up the phone at the other end and a discussion emerges, being met with stupidity at every sentence, destructive nature, is suppressing potential and imagination of others. I also wrote today, in response to : The only thing it suppresses is nonsense and ignorance ( on a science forum under the discussion; are scientists nihilistic somewhat? ) This nonsense and ignorance includes, envisioning the world non-scientifically, that's maybe up in flames, or perhaps as a utopia, things that aren't real. You can conceptualize it, you can visualize it in the near space; this is non-scientific. The nonsense side of things, can be just that, nonsense, but there are parts of creativity that are smart... If I imagine myself in the near space, I do not have to draw every circle or edge. Now I'm not saying this is true but I guess our creativity has evolved since we were in the sea; we can probably imagine more things, or the things we can imagine are effected by our environment, and we have a more exquisite environment ( there are many good-sounding theories that I don't know if are correct ). It's utility in itself, it helps to form ideas, it's free fun, and many of other things; scientific nihilism therefore is the neglect of creativity through covert 'set in stone' discrimination [ such as above ], followed by held in laughter, and being on the edge of the seats or more commonly perversity. I'm trying to be kind but you come at me with an angered tone because I don't agree with you - I'm not addressing moderation, by the way, just you. You're not being fair in any way, and you've been unfair for a while - this is not a complaint, be unfair. I find it annoying when you're critical about my writing, because it's not in the jest with the common view, even though there's nothing you can say to dismiss what I'm saying makes my ideas right; I'm not talking about the original topic, but prior ones, where people have claimed I have been 'challenged' - and what you're referring to with your angered tone. Maybe people have submissive mentalities because of scientific nihilism, it's in the people's nature to skim read my writing and pay attention to yours, weighting the discussion or debates in the favored direction, in this case the minority power. It's a case of "with power comes responsibility", yes we can do science but we should do it correctly, for it is dangerous at times, it causes death and destruction. You wouldn't tell your kids to touch a fire, so why would you go by the logic, nothing "should" be done? If you can't eat do you deserve to be in the minds of people, as a person, simply, a model of a person or someone who wasn't worthy? (Unless by illness for that must be luck; of course, I am saying by choice). At times things should be done.

Posted this on reddit.... It's clear as day that depressive, and often maleficent behaviour, is the source of a majority of people's depression; but it's also a source of release for a majority of the depressed. Therefore, there is a perspective wherein this behaviour is supported, and another where it's opposed. For the purposes of this thread I have split the concept of depression into two categories: short-term depression and long-term depression. A 'short-term depression' is a depressed feeling for a few minutes or hours, whereas 'long-term depression', is more severe, and lasts up to a lifetime. Not ALL depression is coming from depressive behaviour of others; inter alia, ugliness, anxiety and poverty, can spur depression. Reddit itself acts as a mediator of depression. Reddit allows the depressed to find their release through the system of, never fair or just, down-votes and up-votes, and causes depression in others by the very same means. The people who use, and admins who run, Reddit, claim that they want to help depressed people, posting links to support and so on, but neither would put their own profits or reputation below the mental health of others - that comes first no matter what problems they cause in the process. Admins want to keep the voting system as it is because the various bandwagons, as the moderators and admins call them, led by the depressive, keep money in the owners pockets. Reddit even restricts users from posting if they've accumulated enough down-votes; a fine example that shows that Reddit supports depressive behaviour. People with depressive attitudes are given a seat of power, they get to dictate your experience on Reddit; they may always think that they can get rid of a user, and down-vote on that basis. All intelligence and originality is lost in emotional pandemonium, of held in laughter and general bigotry, not to mention the lazy and opinion-based moderation. The conspiracy here goes on into other websites and social circles, but occurring more prominently on the internet. An example: GTA V received many good reviews on steam. A lot of, good and intelligent, people, put in effort to write their reviews, only to have them ruined by emotional wrecks in a train of petty, behind-a-computer-screen, hatred. Many good reviews at 85-90% up-votes, were down-voted to 50%, primarily because these out-of-control steam users were annoyed with aspects of the game. I wrote a good review, and I never changed my mind. Here, good, intelligent people, had their vision clouded by unintelligent and evil people, causing them short-term depression. Ruins are easily created, but the house that was once built wasn't so easy and simple. We shouldn't have to live in a world where hypothetical houses, are made into ruins, because a person was emotionally, touched. I know it doesn't bother the average reader, because you weren't the owner of the house. I'm not here for the up-votes, or recognition. I have faith that no matter how little attention this receives, because what I'm saying is of the utmost intelligence, it will pass through silently anyway. I see myself as a type of father figure - someone has to make a sacrifice... Thank you!

Flavoured Water. I've never been an alcohol fan.

Steam ID: LTP: ( aspect(s) ) Steam ID: http://steamcommunity.com/id/s13ep/ LTP: ( aspect(s) ) ArmA 3 ( editor mainly ), Divinity: Original Sin ( active co-op partner ), Other games on my Steam.

"God isn't a necessary for morality, justice is. God isn't a necessary for heaven and earth, righteousness is. God is all these things to you, honor, respect, etc. included, but calling them God is an understatement. A lesser wisdom than them all together, ineffable." You could not believe in God all your life and do good things. Doing, not thinking. Thought in words is meaningless on terms of 'good'. Were you good? I didn't waste much and promoted rationalism, thus my goodness goes on into the future, I am what good is. Two wrongs don't make a right, what do two rights make? A brighter future. "You didn't believe in God" "Time for Hell". - Promotes ignorance and carrying on blindly as "normal" [WTF is normal]... Also, [backhand Her] ( I thought to myself, what is she thinking, she will get a backhand and then )

So now that you can... will you? :> Of course not, simply taking comfort in the fact that I could make awesome photos is perfectly sufficient for me. Oh, today I bought some shoes... I I buy all my clothes from ASOS. It's the best place for deals; I spent 1000 in January and 1000 over the space of a few months ( but at the time I didn't have much clothes ). I expect to be buying more in January. Oh yeah, and I got a mouth infection.

Tried to design a story centered around psychological attacks called "Jokers"; where the protagonist has a sober trip, and during his episode he has imaginary battles with people in a kind of dreamworld. He spends his time conjuring up imagery in his imagination, as you do, but it becomes over-powering - taken over by sensory illusions in the space around him that only gets more powerful. He experiences a tunnel-like mechanism in the mind, and he can travel through it (he'd see it with eyes closed and be able to manipulate it with the mental bond), and many peaks and falls of, basically, illusion.

LEGO™ Worlds. (like a baws)

Hehe.

Nihilism in Society Nihilism is accepted in society, or people are ignorant of it. It presents itself in many different ways; the most prominent form of nihilistic behavior is social perversity, which again, can be expressed in multiple formats. The natures of humanity are far more superior than the tools ( words ) we use to communicate, making us highly susceptible to stupidities and critical failures when under their influence. An example of social perversity: A Statement: "It's in my, and the worlds, best interests if we're being humane, to support the Earth so that it can sustain life for the longest time possible". A Response: "What?!" - General Stupidity This is the most common kind of social perversity. I and others were able to read and understand. If you hold back prior knowledge, thought to be smarter, in the place of filtering the knowledge via your own analysis of nature, you won't ****ing understand anything that's not said by educators - you are a passive, progressive, tool - like the words. The ego of humans is given a seat of power through the lesser nature of words [ in relation to the accepted debate of "What?"], and through their reputation, that's often reinforced by an egotistical and opinion-based administration team. In any case, both get away with the act. The admins proclaim expertise in a field, such as philosophy, and their opinions are in flashing lights, so to speak - their very presence is an act of perversity; it's destroying philosophy, it's making potentially good philosophers walk away from the subject, and their support is this train of petty stupidities that keeps their show on the road. At the end of the day, at least they can laugh to keep their egos warm. From that single response, many types of perversity can be understood, but I will not continue naming them, I will simply make my point that these types need to be removed from society. To protect the young minds of today, and to make sure that they have a stable tomorrow. What's so bad about it? It's difficult for people to keep focused under such stupidity [ in reference to "What?" ], and talented individuals to progress [ in reference to bad administration ]. This whole post makes sense, but confusion will arise after a single word response like "What?", and on top of that, it could be brought to an end quicker by way of moderation. A classic metaphor, hell and a harsher hell - which again, is fine and dandy, but it's no place for children to grow up.

ARMA (MRAP) 3 - Mission Editor.

Let's say you're staring at field of white flowers, dotted around green grass, the way it looks to you from a certain angle may be that there is more white than green. This moment is of a certain beauty, it's not harming you thinking differently. If you want, be lost in your own thought, thought is meaning -- words are a tool. Wisdom is the useful expression of this meaning, so you either are wise ( with wisdom ) or foolish ( wisdom evades you ). The theory is that, Heaven and Hell ARE ON EARTH, and that the Western world should remain flourishing, in effort not to make it turn out like parts of the Eastern world.

The ability to subscribe to help the forum and Obsidian. Get a few bonuses, etc.