Blarghagh

This is why I'm in it. Also, this: http://anonymousdeveloper.tumblr.com/ I posted that one before, but I referenced it a few times after that and couldn't find the link so I could source it, so I should add it again.

No, that's not an important thing. It cannot be important how she acted before this because she is not important in this. She may be irritating but she has nothing to do with GamerGate. GamerGate should be focusing on biased and corrupt journalism, not witch-hunting opponents. Nothing Brianna has done has impacted me or anyone else, it's just a lot of empty posturing.

Only if you buy into this nonsense about GamerGate being about misogyny. I believe that back when this was only about Zoe Quinn that I made my position on her as "someone who doesn't matter" quite clear. She's not the problem. Wu's not the problem. Sarkeesian isn't the problem. Either way, trans-shaming, no matter how much of an unlikeable, dumb attention starved freak they've been, is not cool man.

I'm going to agree with this from that same thread, Lexx: "What part ofr Literally Wu? Do you guys not understand This is unacceptable. This needs to stop. Ignore this information. Do not spread it. Throw it away. Ignore it. GamerGate does not need or want this. Who gives a **** about Wu's previous life. She's not GamerGate. You're gonna make it about her more/again."

At the same time, a 16 year old boy (15 at the time of the stabbing) who was painfully obviously mentally ill got tried as an adult and sentenced to 20 years in prison for stabbing his teacher Ann McGuire to death. It's times like this I hate the world.

Thank God for him?

What? I didn't say anything about the website itself. I haven't read enough of it to say so. Just if the website is progressive, that article should be removed. Because "this should have stayed the same because there was no problem for me" is an argument tea baggers make.

No, although for some reason most opponents of Atheism+ appear to think it is. Understandable perhaps as they have a be-a-u-tiful hate-on for many of FTB's bloggers. It is unabashedly progressive and big on social justice issues though, which drives the libertarian/reactionary wing of the atheist/skeptic/secularist movement bonkers. The drama is great fun. Check out slymepit.com if you want a laugh. There are plenty of things to call that article, progressive is not one of them.

I'd like to point out this part that Namuntree also mentioned already, but I have another answer to: Having Jim Sterling oppose you about consumer advocacy in games is like having your medical licence revoked by a medical body, but continuing to practice medicine. Having John Bain oppose you about consumer advocacy in games is like having your medical license revoked by a medical body but continuing to practice medicine. Because lets face it, Jim Sterling is peanuts compared to TotalBiscuit when it comes to consumer advocacy. TotalBiscuit is the king of that court and Jim Sterling is the jester.

Man, that's a lot of strawmen and false equivelancies, and even straight up lies. The continued insistence that Nathan Grayson wrote a review for Depression Quest? That hasn't even been brought up in the last two months.

Will it help if I reveal that I received at least one death threat in the past month?

You got it.

I made my own Chop Suey with chicken so I knew for sure it was chicken.

When I get the $200'000 I'll contact you. So you may be waiting a long time.

I should have specified that I meant that if I got the $200,000 would be the greatest. And actually, I wouldn't say all of the animators are my "friends". Don't think all animators are as happy and laidback as I am.

That would be the greatest. I already know enough awesome animators and designers to fill a team.

Well, if mistakes make you a leader then after this is over she'll be the president.

I'm not a major Star Trek fan so I didn't mind it was a terrible Star Trek film, since Star Trek is all about Utopias and ethical dillemas and that's boooooring. Okay, I'm totally exaggerating this, I enjoy Star Trek but like you I'm not a Trekkie and I enjoyed the reboot as a cool action flick (even though I'll totally make fun of the lens flares). I have no problems with J.J. and I think he'll pull off a decent Star Wars. I think his track record is pretty good, I enjoyed M:I 3, Star Trek and Super 8 though I hated the Star Trek sequel, that was because the script was awful.

Hey man, it was a terrible Star Trek movie, but it was a better Star Wars movie than the prequels. See here:

That was totally cool. Thanks for that.

I think I had it, guys. I'm not sure he needed three posts telling him the same thing.

Are you sure you had the right link there, man? I'm not sure how Michael Jordan talking about Obama had anything to do with this.

It helps that J.J. Abrams already got experience directing Star Wars movies. He made the Star Trek reboot, after all.

Don't whine. Just kidding. I had actually written a pretty in depth, argumentative response already before I realized "hold on, I don't disagree with what you said about the wookie battle".

I don't disagree with any of that and none of my post did either.