jaguars4ever

Surely you're forgetting that Spanish Inquisition = extreme badness. :D

Actaully they seem to be pretty well balanced: Power rating

Rules :cool:

Also: If we 10 players, then we can do War in the Americas: At the very least it'll be a warmup for WW4. :D

Millions could have died if Kerry went into office. He promised a pull-out of troops in six months if you recall. Iraq is a country of 30 million and it would have imploded. He voted to go into war. And then he was going to leave the place in worse condition than he started. And how did Bush lie to start the war? I watched the speech when he announced we were going in. He cited a few things. One - Iraq had WMD. The intel of the entire world said he did, and we have proof he used them on his own people. Intel also suggests that when we gave him plenty of warning those same WMD left Iraq into Syria. We did find trace amounts of illegal WMD, storage facilities, training facilities, manuals for the use of WMD, and illegal missles with biological weapons in them. Did Iraq have WMD? Yes. Did Bush operate off intel the entire world was agreeing with? Yes. I love when people suggest that Bush just made all this up. If that was the case, then why did Clinton say the same thing? Then why did the UN pass over 75 unanimous security resolutions finding that Iraq was in violation of the cease-fire agreement? The same people who insist that Bush lied to create an incident that has been around for over 20 years also usually insist that this is all about oil. Too bad we've spent over 100 billion dollars of our money to take care of Iraq, and we haven't stolen a single drop of oil. Please demonstrate how thousands of people have died over his lies. Because I feel that you are only one lying here. I'm a Democrat by platform, but most of the people who oppose the war are operating off media lies and suppositions rather than facts. Don't start this arguement unless you know what you're getting into. I'll bury you. 2 - Bush noted that we had legal authority to enter Iraq. The original cease-fire was based upon Iraq's compliance, which they were in violation of. Thereby, UN law said the cease-fire was invalid, and the UN had voted unanimously for military action against Iraq in the first place. In addition, there was a unanimous security resolution telling Iraq to immediately comply or else. That was right after 9/11, some 2 years before we moved in. Considering that the UN contined to find them in violation, I think the "or else" clause kicks in. 3 - Partisan politics tends to overlook 30 million people in a country where Saddam was in power. Rape and murder was the law. The man shut off food and water to towns, and people were living in caves to flee Saddam's power as he attempted to practice genocide. I guess people shouldn't make any effort to preserve 30 million lives or stop genocide. That wouldn't be a valid reason at all. Now, I'm REALLY hoping that you come back and attempt to argue that we shouldn't have gone in, that we should have ignored genocide, and that 30 million lives aren't worth saving. Just wait to see what I have to say about that. And if you really want to step in the ring with me, I suggest you start at factcheck.org because I will call you on sources. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Niclely done Ender.

Might as well try and write down next week's winning lottery numbers. ^_^

Well I don't know about you, but personally I think the one of page 2 is a bit of a bitch to be honest. :D

Out of curiosity, what time's that for us SoCal homies.

♫ I pity the fool who won't vote for me, I'm Mr. T, pres'dentially, Gonna bring you back the streets you see! ♫

I'm always up for Diplo, but I doubt many would play unless you refine the map so it's actually legible. This is simply a mess: ---- Given that's it's only 9 players, that really is rather cluttered. Consider the 30 PLAYER World War 4 variant; see how much more readable it is?

I have a Burgundy fetish. " But seriously, it's not so much a sudden attraction as an easing in. Other than the map, which is not drastically different to standard, Abberation is much like the normal game, and so is a good choice, in my opinion, for a first variant, both as a player and more especially as a GM. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you want us to try out this wacked out variant, you better come up with a non-lame-fisted map.

USER : metadigital Nicknames : Meta, Mets, His Excellency The Sultan Metadigital Aurangzeb, Emperor of the Roman and Trebizond Empires, Sovereign of the House of Osman, the 39th Ottoman Sultan, Sultan of Sultans, Khan of Khans, Commander of the Faithful, Ninety-Nineth Successor of the Prophet of the Lord of the Universe, reigns supreme over the Caliphate, the Holy Islamic State. ---- ATTRIBUTES : [*]Intelligence: 5 - This guy has genius level intellect! [*]Wits: 4

"Why yes, this is a most excellent idea if I might say so myself."

USER : 213374U Nicknames : Number Man, Numbers ---- ATTRIBUTES : Intelligence: 3 - Posseses above average intellect. Wits: 4

In other stories... "

Just don't mention Aeon Flux to him. :ph34r:

A bit harsh there Baley & Kaft.

Golden Moment of today's Game:

Come on Baley, is one press release too much to ask?

Looks like a Win XP skin.

Furthermore, blondes can't spell complexion so yet again, Brunettes win.

"Aw really now, you guys are such a tease! *tee hee hee* "

BTW Number Man, what exactly is "Starf*cker"? "

:D Due to lack of tails, Irish girls will do. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Irish girls are teh bomb! It's the sexy accent that does it.

Shut 'yer bleedin' bone-box, cutter! --- But do the curtains match the drapes?