Lucius

Mann gegen mann is my personal favourite from the new album. Rammstein - Te quiero, puta! (don't translate it as I fear it's in violation with language.) is da numero uno, se

You go fight em and die, I'll find a way to make a deal. (I'll need someone who speaks zombie/martian though) :ph34r:

I'm quite the arms happy young man myself, but I don't think that they are 'great'. I most certainly don't believe in war being the answer. I think they look cool, and I don't mind being around them, knowing stuff about em is just a minor hobby to me. Personally I would never kill anyone, nor would I go to war for corrupt administrations and its sinister plans. "

Rammstein - Benzin!!!! BENZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN!!!!

Otherwise known as a Barrett M82 isn't it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes but like the Leo2A5, they added something and gave it a new name. ^_^

WHFB is boring imo, 40k has a lot more to offer. (guess it depends on whether you prefer fantasy or sci-fi) Me? I used to play Dark Angels back in the 90'ies, then I switched over to Chaos and collected various Legions; Khorne World Eaters, Iron Warriors (my biggest), Lost and the Damned and finally a Chaos Undivided force which was in the making recently, but due to my mates moving away I've literally shelved it and the rest of the hobby for now.

Now there, in a world where the word so often is misused, is a hero.

I came because I had questions about KoTOR2 lightsabers, then I happened to click "Way Off Topic" and found these guys. <_< :">

Is it just me, or are the feet of this frog kinda cute?

yeah, right... gotcha. i think you've pretty much dispelled that myth all by yourself. oooh. you are good, aren't you... did you practice that one? i'm curious, how long did it take to stretch your vocabulary to these limits? taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm curious, were you always like this? Or did it start after you embraced hardcore capitalism and began to really step on the little guy? And as far as vocabulary goes, well an arrogant right wing American such as yourself would probably forget that English is not a Danes first language, however I'll return the favour and give you something to think about; ***EDITED by Walsingham for gratuitous use of heathen lingos and quite possibly rude gestures***

Only you don't, at least not in a way that makes you seem like you mean it. Finally we agree on something, the first part that is, the latter is just proof of the first. I felt the need to point it out since you spelled it wrong and made a question mark... that's usually a pretty good indication of the person not having a clue. Of course you could still find a way to come off as arrogant even to that, ****. ***EDITED FOR LANGUAGE***

Good one.

You think you're good at admitting mistakes, but you aren't. You're no better than anyone else. Live with it. Afaik: As Far As I Know.

Ooh ooh, can I play? No and you wait for me to give you permission next time Bitches nowadays Am I right people? Am I right? RUMMY! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I thought that was love?

sorry, difficult to tell one ideology from, well, an identical one. no, the other way around is more true. i make mistakes, and admit them. but i don't continue to make the same, tired, inability to comprehend the material before me mistakes so common in here... taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I meant that you fret in as much you mixed the two of us up. Here you almost admitted to making a mistake, yet still you didn't as you try to justify yourself at the end of the sentence by taking a jab at us. Tsk tsk taks. Speaking of which, you didn't admit the other one either, by the way, since you still try to explain it away in your previous post. That's not admitting a mistake, it's running in circles. Edit: They did indeed hate communists, but also socialists in general afaik.

Would this be considered torture?

oh, now i get it... gripe about sources till i provide one and what do we get? "oh no, i can't stand differing opinions, it may offend my sensibilities." can't have your cake and eat it too. if you want sources, you're just going to have to buckle down and understand that evidence is applicable even if it doesn't support your position. talk about living life in a fish bowl. do you actually read anything that opposes your world view? unbelievable. and mkreku called me narrow minded... sheesh. taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I never called for any sources. You have me and REG mixed up. Don't fret so much just because we corrected you before dear taks, it's not worth you getting all hysterical. ... mkreku is right, though.

Not really, you just tried to explain that you said it was based on. Which you didn't actually say. Doesn't really matter which way you try to put it, we all know what you meant and hence we corrected your mistake. Must be horrible to be wrong, huh? It's called making a point, we don't get any of Norways oil money. Be they 22% or 25%, it's still their own money. What you're trying to do is to dismiss the Scandinavian welfare model by crying about Norways oil. As for the other two, we're not the only nations in the world with good exports.

No thanks, if the devil has ever done anything in reality, he's hosted that site.

Tease. :"> To the pictures above, I like the D: thing.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}> i did not say socialism was nazism, i said nazism is based on socialism. the economic system was socialist. again with the reading comprehension thing... taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually, you didn't. You said Now what was it about the reading comprehension again? Now there's something to get a kick out of. Norway is 22% of Scandinavia, not that a few % matters, since they don't count as Scandinavia alone, and we don't get any of their oil money.

That's my prime minister. (w00t) But he claims to be such good friends with Georgie... :">

I mean dog. I'll settle for that.

Group **** anyone?

there's a quote steeped in pure logic. uh, hate to tell you, but nazism is socialism - the national socialist german workers party. i get a kick out of people that just don't understand that. if you want to refer to one of us "right-wingers," you need to make a thinly veiled reference to italy and benito mussolini. he was a fascist, which is what right-wing economics is all about. that you would prefer to lob insults as well is hardly a surprise. the least you could do is get it right. taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Fool, I was talking about which mod had deleted the post I made in response to your laughable threat about banning. And Nazism wasn't really socialist, you know, it was as much fascism as their friends in Spain and Italy. You stupid enough to think that the SS was made up of socialists? Why, then, did they hate Communism so much? Why did the US get so many of their leaders out so they could help the allies against the USSR after WW2? In fact, are you suggesting they have something in common with socialists today? No wait, I'll answer for you; They WEREN'T Socialists, they HATED the socialists. End of ****ing story you arrogant... fascist?