Meshugger

Apparently these are domains where the DC Madam's record are going to be uploaded. bienvenidosmiami.com civilforfeiture.com coinodyssey.com dailyshowwithtrevornoah.com deborahjeanepalfrey.com domsubmatch.com medicinal-marijuana-company.com miamilyft.com montgomeryblairsibley.com privacycomplianceconsulting.com sashaworkx.com sibleyinvestments.com whyjusther.com *crosses fingers for the Clintons and Cruz being those lists shortly*

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/04/corporate-media-gatekeepers-protect-western-1-from-panama-leak/ I'll wait until all the data has been released, if ever. They got it from a German newspaper, and believe me there is nothing they would like more than to expose the dirty secrets of western corporations. If this had been leaked to a Russian newspaper, do you really think any of them would have remained un-arrested for very long. 2,6 terabytes worth of files if I recall. You need a small army of reporters. On the contrary, why should they **** the bed? But we shall see, only 149 out of 11 million records have been released so far, and this is only one company of many. We shall see if the rumors are true and we will suddenly see capital fleeing the Caymans and Switzerland to the new tax havens in Nevada, Wyoming and South Dakota.

Hahahaha, dear lord. Mr. Drumpf tweeted the "Trump Effect" and EA quickly took it down, but they were too slow and mirrors are popping up all over the place. Trump = Shepard Soros = a Reaper Hillary = a dog (an evil one)

The slave trade didn't stop just because the US abolished it. The African traders just went to look elsewhere (the arabs and ottomans).

Election tyme tomorrah. Got to hand it to those fellas, they surely know their propaganda.

Kinda strange what hasn't been published from the link, don't you think? https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/04/corporate-media-gatekeepers-protect-western-1-from-panama-leak/ I'll wait until all the data has been released, if ever.

This frame was beautiful.

People believe in freedom so long as they like what you are doing with it and you don't have something they think you shouldn't. We are just as free as we are told to be. Thankfully you americans have a constitution that your betters have to check each time before telling you how free you should be.

Thats okay, its the RL outcome from Trumps sexism and how women will vote that matters Weak bait. Step up your game.

Each time one person cries about sexism, 10 more people will cheer for the one accused of such.

It's because the modding community wield no power and no expert in creating everyone equal is interested in something powerless.

Sandman was published by DC. As for political content, you'd be hard-pressed to find a much more left-leaning publication than Hellblazer. Granted, DC isn't continuing either now. Also relevant. That link explained it quite well for a comic book ignoramous like me who only own one (1!) comic book and have no idea about medium at large. Kudos.

She argues that stereotype/trope where male characters are constantly sexualized and made to look sexually pleasant, don't exist in our culture which is why portraying men similarly sexualized as women don't enforce (fe)male gaze trope for men as there is not trope to enforce in first place. It is like gender swapping trope all abusers are men, you don't create trope where all abusers are women but instead it usually just works as comedy aspect that enforces existing stereotype where all abusers are men. But Elerond why did Anita upset so many gamers?....Why didnt people just ignore what she said ....but many of you guys seemed to actually read her videos and get upset? That is the question. Probably because many journalists and the media at large use, or used to, take her her seriously. Like she was the most important person to go to in gaming, compared to real heavy weights like Carmack. It was like Jerry Falwell would've been the go-to when it came to what music or movies should be made.

Guys this is exactly the honesty I was hoping for ...well done as I know talking about about sexual orientation isn't always easy But if you find Ned Flanders ass sexually inordinate I will support you, SJ goes both way ..and you right, mens assets can be objectified too Now you're just stupid. Okay I'm confused? I thought the whole point of the Flanders cartoon is to demonstrate other examples outside of women in games where characters features are embellished....what is the point then of the Flanders cartoon? Are you at all familiar with the phenomon called "pop-culture"-references? Okay but what is the point you making? Is this linked to the tracer incident ..I assumed it was? Sweet Jesus, lord have mercy. "Stupid Sexy Flanders" in Simpons --> same Ned Flanders in Overwatch --> Stupidingly sexy --> reference, emphasis on words. We laugh. Haha.

Guys this is exactly the honesty I was hoping for ...well done as I know talking about about sexual orientation isn't always easy But if you find Ned Flanders ass sexually inordinate I will support you, SJ goes both way ..and you right, mens assets can be objectified too Now you're just stupid. Okay I'm confused? I thought the whole point of the Flanders cartoon is to demonstrate other examples outside of women in games where characters features are embellished....what is the point then of the Flanders cartoon? Are you at all familiar with the phenomon called "pop-culture"-references?

Guys this is exactly the honesty I was hoping for ...well done as I know talking about about sexual orientation isn't always easy But if you find Ned Flanders ass sexually inordinate I will support you, SJ goes both way ..and you right, mens assets can be objectified too Now you're just stupid.

Stupidingly sexy

That's a fair point. I don't think anyone here would argue the Afghanistan intervention was needed. But every one since was a bad idea. Congress could have stopped every one of them it's worth mentioning. You all know where I stand on US foreign policy and of of these 5 candidates the only two who favor a more reserved, less interventionist attitude are two who probably won't win. From a FP perspective do you think there will be a bit of difference in the actions of a Clinton, Cruz, or Kasich State Dept? I don't think there will be. So again, what does it matter? It's not just invasions and the like, there's also trade agreements and there there is some differences between candidates. Probably theoretical difference as I'd suspect when it came down to it all of Clinton, Cruz, Trump and Kasich would sign up to the TPPA/ TTIP whatever they say now but at least theoretically Clinton/ Trump and Sanders oppose TPPA with only Kasich outright supporting it. The trade deals and the support, or lack it, is a good indicator on where their priorities might be. In other news, something very, very interesting might happen within 72 hours. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/dc-madams-attorney-says-election-bombshell-already-online Probably too good to be true though. Well I'll be very surprised if Cruz has had affairs, I dont particularly like him but to cheat on his wife....I find it hard to believe? The man has the face of a rat, the mannerism and body language of an ****, and has lied so much that it's even unbecoming of a politician. KP i think is on the money here.

That's a fair point. I don't think anyone here would argue the Afghanistan intervention was needed. But every one since was a bad idea. Congress could have stopped every one of them it's worth mentioning. You all know where I stand on US foreign policy and of of these 5 candidates the only two who favor a more reserved, less interventionist attitude are two who probably won't win. From a FP perspective do you think there will be a bit of difference in the actions of a Clinton, Cruz, or Kasich State Dept? I don't think there will be. So again, what does it matter? It's not just invasions and the like, there's also trade agreements and there there is some differences between candidates. Probably theoretical difference as I'd suspect when it came down to it all of Clinton, Cruz, Trump and Kasich would sign up to the TPPA/ TTIP whatever they say now but at least theoretically Clinton/ Trump and Sanders oppose TPPA with only Kasich outright supporting it. The trade deals and the support, or lack it, is a good indicator on where their priorities might be. In other news, something very, very interesting might happen within 72 hours. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/dc-madams-attorney-says-election-bombshell-already-online Probably too good to be true though.

The most interesting part is As in Hillary and Bernie both registered late, at the same day even. But only Bernie got a complaint, while Hillary didn't and is therefore clear to be placed on the ballot. //EDIT: i accidently quoted the post instead of editing it. My bad.

Bernie can't catch a break: http://archive.is/Dh9VX

Did you read the explanation? They weren't entirely happy with the image and he says " We actually already have an alternate pose that we love and we feel speaks more to the character of Tracer. We weren’t entirely happy with the original pose, it was always one that we wrestled with creatively " This is a none issue...it amazes why you aren't supporting this decision and being logical He's a liar.

What a bunch of cucks. Serving the interests of those that have zero significance is purchasing power over Blizzard's product.

No Trump has demonstrated indirectly he has very little respect for women, you may think his comments are cool and refreshing but I dont I think its appalling and offensive...but I am not outraged as I am use to Trump saying similar things. I am just annoyed Also can you find some examples of other Republican candidates that have said similar things....since this is normal for you there must be lots of examples? Just watch the same debate, Trump was on the lowest on the pro-life scale among the other candidates. But as usual, only his opinion is weighed higher than the others, how strange. It's like they do not like him or something and it clouds their judgement when reporting.

Those were in fact the " bad old days ", countries and there citizens were less safe and information gathering was less effective Yes, we are now living in good times due to the advancements of how governments can protect citizens from existential threats Hahahahahhahahhahahha