Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Mass Effect 3


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
581 replies to this topic

#561
Oblarg

Oblarg

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 878 posts

To be fair, the collectors do have one thing that makes them a seemingly formidable foe. They can do hit and run attacks at will, as without the navigational equipment, nobody can give chase through the relays. As a gamer, you know/suspect their strength (or lack of), but only after passing through the relay to their base can you confirm that they are indeed not a military threat in a conventional warfare scenario. Never mind what their covert activities may or may not amount to on a strategic level in conflict.


Well, yeah, I wouldn't have a problem with the Collectors being a small hit-and-run force were it not for the fact that several of the characters outright state that they'd have to target earth to complete their human reaper, something which, given Earth's defenses and the minute scale of the Collector force, seems an outright impossibility. Once again, this seems like an oversight, not an intentional feature - BioWare could very well prove me wrong in ME3, but that opens a whole new can of worms as to why everyone in ME2 (most importantly Shepard) seems to labor under the illusion that the Collectors somehow pose a legitimate threat to alliance space (rather than simply the fringe colonies).

It seems the options here are that the Collectors are stupidly weak and could not have ever completed their plans, or that Shepard and everyone he works with are effectively braindead for the entirety of ME2. I'm honestly not sure which of these I dislike the least.

Edited by Oblarg, 05 February 2012 - 11:09 PM.


#562
Gorth

Gorth

    Global Moderator

  • Global Moderators
  • 9733 posts
  • Location:Australia


To be fair, the collectors do have one thing that makes them a seemingly formidable foe. They can do hit and run attacks at will, as without the navigational equipment, nobody can give chase through the relays. As a gamer, you know/suspect their strength (or lack of), but only after passing through the relay to their base can you confirm that they are indeed not a military threat in a conventional warfare scenario. Never mind what their covert activities may or may not amount to on a strategic level in conflict.


Well, yeah, I wouldn't have a problem with the Collectors being a small hit-and-run force were it not for the fact that several of the characters outright state that they'd have to target earth to complete their human reaper, something which, given Earth's defenses and the minute scale of the Collector force, seems an outright impossibility. Once again, this seems like an oversight, not an intentional feature - BioWare could very well prove me wrong in ME3, but that opens a whole new can of worms as to why everyone in ME2 (most importantly Shepard) seems to labor under the illusion that the Collectors somehow pose a legitimate threat to alliance space (rather than simply the fringe colonies).

It seems the options here are that the Collectors are stupidly weak and could not have ever completed their plans, or that Shepard and everyone he works with are effectively braindead for the entirety of ME2. I'm honestly not sure which of these I dislike the least.

I lean towards one or more oversights in coordinating the story. Just as a thought experiment, if we assume the Collectors are not acting on their own, but being manipulated by the reapers like sock puppets (assuming control), a possible use for the reaper they are building (the giant T2 robot), could be a fifth columnist infiltrator Reaper, something like Sovereigns replacement, which would be a completely different level of threat. We don't know if they intended to harvest all of humanity first or just enough to finish the current WIP reaper (and then possess a completely different magnitude of firepower).

Yes. the story has too many holes to really connect the dots. Maybe some of the DLC/Comics ties up the loose ends better?

#563
Oblarg

Oblarg

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 878 posts

Just as a thought experiment, if we assume the Collectors are not acting on their own, but being manipulated by the reapers like sock puppets (assuming control), a possible use for the reaper they are building (the giant T2 robot), could be a fifth columnist infiltrator Reaper, something like Sovereigns replacement, which would be a completely different level of threat. We don't know if they intended to harvest all of humanity first or just enough to finish the current WIP reaper (and then possess a completely different magnitude of firepower).


The thing is, even were we to discard the lines about how they'd need to target earth to finish their reaper (in fact, let's be super-generous and say that they can do it without entering alliance space and thus without really risking their only cruiser and still being able to play to their strengths), it's still unclear what a new reaper would do. Sure, they could fling it at the Citadel and hope it fares better than Sovereign, but really, is that sound strategy? Especially coming from a hyper-advanced machine race? You'd think they'd have a better Plan B than "try the same thing over again and hope it actually works this time." Remember, as well, that in ME2 the conduit is deactivated - so it's unclear how they'd activate the relay in the first place without being able to get someone on the inside to take Citadel control (Saren's job in the first game, and the entire reason he spent so much effort searching for the conduit). So, even if we were to A) assume that the collectors could finish the reaper with only colonists from lightly guarded systems and B) further accept that trying to take the Citadel again with the new reaper is sound strategy (both assumptions require you to ignore quite a bit of the narrative and/or to cease critical thinking), it's not even clear that they could activate the citadel relay at this point to begin with.

The really frustrating thing is that none of these problems would be particularly hard to write around - a few changes could make the plot a whole lot stronger and more believable, but as it is ME2's plot just strikes me as several partially-developed ideas strung together without any rigorous proof-reading. Good concepts are not enough - you have to implement them properly, and BioWare really dropped the ball there.

#564
Gorth

Gorth

    Global Moderator

  • Global Moderators
  • 9733 posts
  • Location:Australia

The really frustrating thing is that none of these problems would be particularly hard to write around - a few changes could make the plot a whole lot stronger and more believable, but as it is ME2's plot just strikes me as several partially-developed ideas strung together without any rigorous proof-reading. Good concepts are not enough - you have to implement them properly, and BioWare really dropped the ball there.

Well, plotholes or not, I did enjoy large parts of the game despite a number of shortcomings. Lets face it, the game was based on the idea that it should be about companion missions and somebody somewhere needed to come up with a pretext why you should move from the start of the game to the end of the game. Since there is a law somewhere that states that modern games needs mini games and boss fights, they had to throw in that too, plus the mandatory big baddie at the end. Lets make it a human shaped baddie just for dramatic effect, people probably won't care too much about trivial details when getting to this point in the game. Nothing exceptional really, it being tried a tested formula, not only in Bioware games. Heck, a number of Obsidian games do it too, following those written and unwritten conventions. The difference is in the window dressing.

My biggest plot complaint was, why the heck should I... *I* for effins sake, Sheppard II "Reaperslayer", the Chosen one, waste 50% of my precious time that I should have spent as "quality time" together with Yeoman Chambers in my bunk, saving the galaxy, be spent on doing geological surveys of random space rocks? Something any Cerberus clerk with a few graduate astro-geologists could do in the background
  • greylord likes this

#565
WorstUsernameEver

WorstUsernameEver

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 5596 posts
  • Location:Whateverland
  • Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
Mass Effect 2 has horrible storytelling choices (not necessarily plot holes) and yet we're focusing on the ship class of the Normandy? Oh man.

#566
Bos_hybrid

Bos_hybrid

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2121 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

1. Shepard working for TIM:


For plot purposes. Other examples include: Why did you have to play K1 not knowing the PC is Revan, when for most of the game you knew you were? Why did I have to have Kreia for 3/4 of K2 despite knowing she was going to betray me? I could go on and on.

And of course he and Cerberus are the only ones that actually believe the reapers exist.(ie bio writing everyone else stupid)

2. Spending the entire game recruiting a "team":


So you have the ability to deal with whatever lies behind Omega 4 relay? Could it of been done better/smarter? Yes, bio should of had you finding these allies while searching for clues about the collectors, and finding allies that could provide military aid(ie ships/armies). But then we would of been repeating ME1 and Kotors theme and touching on ME3s theme.

Again not a plothole but a design/story decision you don't agree with.

3. The loyalty system


You said it yourself, not a plothole. As to whether personal issues getting in the way of things, they do. Not saying Bio couldn't of done it better then Tali taking a rocket to the face because she had flotilla issues. Having said that, staying alive would require focus and personal dramas can cause a lack of focus. A better way of doing it imo would of been, resolving Tali's flotilla issue, was part of obtaining adv Quarian shielding.

4. The Derelict Reaper


You are talking about the same council that was hit by a reaper attack and still refuses to believe they exist, as anything more than a powerful vessel obtained by a rogue spectre. Showing them the derelict reaper would of probably got the 'another powerful ship' response, not their belief in the reaper threat.

Again perhaps a better plothole would be the writing of unbelievably stupid leaders of advance civilizations. *Looks at current world leaders* Maybe not so unbelievable.

5. The Collector Plan


1. Normandy = Enterprise/Defiant/Voyager. Destroyed for emotional purposes, otherwise invincible.

2. Maguffin advancements the Normandy can recieve before the confrontation. (The collector ship should of destroyed Normandy without these enhancements with a critical failure screen, however the bitching done by gamers had this been the case would of been......)

3. The main threat of the Collectors was there abilty to hit a planet harvest the population and leave before anyone noticed. (Yeah the, OMG there going for Eath was stupid unnecessary drama) Would also like to point out, that it was Shep and his companions that came to this conclusion, can't remeber any statement from the collectors or Harbinger stating it was. In fact the Collectors method of assault, attacking remote colonies, would indicate that they do realize they could not hit Earth, otherwise that would of been hit first.

Edited by Bos_hybrid, 06 February 2012 - 01:22 AM.


#567
Zoraptor

Zoraptor

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1599 posts

Well, yeah, I wouldn't have a problem with the Collectors being a small hit-and-run force were it not for the fact that several of the characters outright state that they'd have to target earth to complete their human reaper, something which, given Earth's defenses and the minute scale of the Collector force, seems an outright impossibility.

That seems to be primarily shlock space opera staple- Earth is in Danger, Stay Tuned For More!!! though if I play ME2 again some time I may pay a bit more attention to who is talking about Earth being hit and what they say exactly, and whether it comes from TIM directly or indirectly. Otherwise, the Collector's plan seemed to be the far more sensible kill off all the aliens on Omega and hit there next, rather than Earth. That would certainly make more sense given the Collector's apparent weakness at direct confrontation.

#568
HoonDing

HoonDing

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 6725 posts
  • Location:Absurdistan

Mass Effect 2 has horrible storytelling choices (not necessarily plot holes) and yet we're focusing on the ship class of the Normandy? Oh man.

The best one was Shepard and Co taking a shuttle after getting the Reaper homing beacon so that the entire crew of the Normandy could get kidnapped and Joker have his moment of glory.

Edited by virumor, 06 February 2012 - 02:33 AM.

  • greylord likes this

#569
Drowsy Emperor

Drowsy Emperor

    (12) Mage

  • Members
  • 1936 posts
Any attempt to seriously analyse the logic behind Mass Effect stories will lead to Wrex sized brain tumor. You have been warned.

Edited by Drowsy Emperor, 06 February 2012 - 04:39 AM.


#570
Morgoth

Morgoth

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 10099 posts
  • Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

The best one was Shepard and Co taking a shuttle after getting the Reaper homing beacon so that the entire crew of the Normandy could get kidnapped and Joker have his moment of glory.

Ah yes. That was kinda weird. Was it ever explained why Shep and his henchmen took off with a Shuttle while the Nromandy was then ravaged by the Protheans? It felt totally cheap. I expected better from a developer who prides itself having a "professional" writer-army working on their games.

#571
Oner

Oner

    Loner of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 6984 posts
  • Backer
http://www.escapistm...-Effect-3-Saves

#572
Orogun01

Orogun01

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2835 posts
  • Location:somewhere over the rainbow


The best one was Shepard and Co taking a shuttle after getting the Reaper homing beacon so that the entire crew of the Normandy could get kidnapped and Joker have his moment of glory.

Ah yes. That was kinda weird. Was it ever explained why Shep and his henchmen took off with a Shuttle while the Nromandy was then ravaged by the Protheans? It felt totally cheap. I expected better from a developer who prides itself having a "professional" writer-army working on their games.

Maybe they were on a mission and could not be bothered by all the screaming on their comms to come back to the ship. I'm still shaky as to why the Collectors didn't just take the Normandy. You get the crew and leave Shep stranded in the middle of nowhere, man those Collectors are very dumb masterminds.

Edited by Orogun01, 06 February 2012 - 09:28 AM.


#573
Nepenthe

Nepenthe

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 4494 posts
  • Location:Office of Special Tactics and Reconnaissance
  • Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Have to accept some levels of plot-induced stupidity. I particularly liked Cerberus putting their logo on the hull of the Normandy.

Already explained with the Hells Angels logo. Makes perfect sense. :p

The only thing that really bothered me about ME2 was that giant Terminator robot. Any so-called plot holes or inconsistencies, or any "forced" actions in ME2 were minor. So as long as ME3 doesn't have something as equal dumb looking, I won't complain.

Pretty much this. Though (even) the human Reaper didn't really lessen my enjoyment, could've been better handled.




..list


Only one of those (working with Cerberus) is a genuine plothole, the rest is just stuff you didn't like.

Glad I wasn't the only one thinking that.

Though I'm almost tempted to put Cerberus under "retcon" rather than plothole, it's so blatant.


The best one was Shepard and Co taking a shuttle after getting the Reaper homing beacon so that the entire crew of the Normandy could get kidnapped and Joker have his moment of glory.

Ah yes. That was kinda weird. Was it ever explained why Shep and his henchmen took off with a Shuttle while the Nromandy was then ravaged by the Protheans?

Yepp, you're going on a mission away from the Normandy which is restricted to sub-light travel due to the IFF integration process. Miranda has the genius idea of bringing everybody along, so you don't have to decide on your away team until the last moment. Plot-required stupidity, but not implausible.

#574
Tale

Tale

    Forum Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 9414 posts
  • Location:Home is where the heart is, mine is in my chest.
  • Xbox Gamertag:Tale82
  • Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
Plot required stupidity two ways. The Collectors should have just blown the Normandy 2 up. It worked rather well the first time, why change?

This feels unsporting. Mass Effect has some plot problems. Whether it's plot holes, everyone being idiots when convenient, or the regular "this bleep doesn't make any sense." Not to be hyperbolic, but it's like picking on the infirm. We all know it can't fight back. Poor little guy.

Still, Bioware should be able to do better.

#575
greylord

greylord

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1053 posts

Honestly, greylord, I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to you when you're seemingly not interested in reasoned discussion so much as baseless ad-hominem. Still, here goes:

The collectors were taking away Human colonists to who knows where in large numbers. No one could get to them. They'd zoom in and out before anyone could touch them. TIM was willing to do something about it, and he raised Shepard in order to do this. Shepard did it because he saw that there was a threat...and TIM was willing to give him the materials to deal with it. No one else was.


Again, you're missing the point. The collectors, as they were presented, were incapable of attacking anything more than defenseless fringe colonies in the Terminus systems, because their entire fleet consisted of one fairly weak cruiser (rationalize away, but nothing changes the fact that your frigate, unupgraded, is able to destroy it in the final battle) and a collection of floating eyeballs. They were even driven off by a few defense cannons on Horizon. How, pray tell, would the Collectors even come close to accomplishing their goal of finishing the human reaper without the capability to penetrate alliance space?

Next, Shep is given a NEW ship, bigger, stronger and better than the one that the Collectors blew up. It is outfitted with the LATEST technology with weapons, stealth, and everything else. It's like comparing a frigate from WWI with a Cruiser of the Modern era...which do you think is better? Do you really think a cruiser of our era couldn't take on a Dreadnought of WWI? Or even stand a chance?


Right now you're just showing your own ignorance of Mass Effect lore. The Normandy version II is still a *frigate.* From the Codex:

Frigates are light escort and scouting vessels. They often have extensive GARDIAN systems to provide anti-fighter screening for capital ships, and carry a squad of marines for security and groundside duty. Unlike larger vessels, frigates are able to land on planets.
The most important role filled by frigates is reconnaissance. Sensors, unlike ships and communications employing the mass effect, are limited to the speed of light, therefore a stationary observer can detect a vessel a light year away only when its light year arrives a year later.
Because faster than-light attackers always arrive before defenders can detect them with luminal sensors, attackers can always surprise defenders. For defense, fleets surround themselves with spheres of scouting frigates scanning for enemy ships and transmitting warnings to the main body.
Frigates achieve high FTL cruise speeds because of their high-performance drives. They also have proportionally larger thrusters and lighter design mass, allowing them greater maneuverability. In combat, speed and maneuverability make frigates immune to long-range fire of larger vessels.
In fleet combat, frigates are organized into "wolf pack" flotillas of four to six. Wolf packs speed through enemy formations, hunting enemy vessels whose kinetic barriers have been taken down by fighter-launched disruptor torpedoes. The wolf pack circle-strafes vulnerable targets, using their superior speed and maneuverability to evade return fire.

Now, your frigate is not particularly special, as far as combat goes. The Normandy SR-2, unupgraded, is spec'd to the original Normandy (which, if you'll recall, is built for stealth and minor skirmishes, not for pitched combat), minus the size changes and a few other misc. upgrades (leather seats? haha) - you'd know this, too, if you paid attention to the dialog in-game. Now, explain to me, if such a vessel is able to destroy what is revealed to be the only collector cruiser, how exactly were the collectors much of a threat at all? Perhaps the reason the Alliance wasn't doing anything about the abducted colonies was because the collectors were a chicken**** excuse for an enemy - Zoraptor's theory is certainly more reasonable here than just accepting that somehow the Normandy is a super-ship and Joker is a super-pilot and somehow Shepard & Co. were able to do with one reconaissance frigate what the alliance wouldn't have been able to do with, you know, an actual fleet?

So a cruiser class and battle ship class is not battle ready...and you have the best pilot in the galaxy...sure...dream on....

Plus, even with that you still have to fight them off in your hull because they're trying to board you instead of out and out destroy you apparantly in your approach...and you STILL crash land...


What the **** are you even saying here? None of that is relevant. You can defeat the collector ship with the unupgraded Normandy. The Normandy is a single frigate. The systems alliance has a very large fleet. What threat did the collectors legitimately pose to human space?


I think you'd side with the council in ME1 and ME2...afterall you probably didn't consider Sovereign a threat until it attacked the council, and probably would have let the reaper be created so it could come in and wreak havoc as well...

I don't think your problem is with plot holes, but the entire ME series and Bioware...in which case instead of accusing everyone else of ignoring plot holes...maybe you should just go design your own solid plot that we can laugh at and point out all it's plotholes instead?


The irony here is that I haven't accused anyone of anything - I voiced my opinion on the game, and you jumped down my throat at a perceived attack on your love of the game. If your best argument is really nothing more than "well, you couldn't write better!" then you shouldn't bother replying in the first place. Christ, from the animosity you're showing you'd think I insulted your mother or something, not simply disagreed with you about the writing in a video game. Grow up.

Your imagination is vivid...but not convincing me at all. Maybe if you had less whine and opinion and more objectivity...I might have more inclination to actually see a plothole, but thus far you haven't really pointed out anything that is actually seriously a plot hole.


Well, this is rich - the guy spouting the ad-hominem has the balls to also demand "less whine and opinion and more objectivity." Go figure.

Plotholes would be a little bigger such as...I shot Wrex and killed him dead in ME1...so why is Wrex sitting around alive in ME2...did he get ressurected by TIM too? (Note: I actually haven't run into this bug...but just saying...if Wrex was alive in ME2 after I shot him in ME1...I could see that as a possible plothole).


So anything short of an outright break in the narrative's continuity is not really a plot hole? Glad to see you have such high standards.


Long post in which you really don't do anything. You brought up some made up concerns to begin with...so having someone contest them seems to make you more unhappy.

I'm not trying to convince you, I'm seeing if you have ANYTHING that convinces me of something, and thus far, you haven't.

You're goal was always to backup your statements that there were plotholes...plotholes that you haven't convinced me of at all. Most of your "plotholes" are more along the lines of...I didn't like this and so this is what is wrong...at least thus far with what you've provided.

Perhaps if you look for actual PLOTHOLES instead of things that you simply didn't care for, you may be more successful. As I stated before, I already realize that 99% of games out there have plotholes, that includes ME2. The problem is you haven't hit a single REAL plothole that is actually present (and they are there, and much more obvious) in the game, your list is more of a collection of things that you personally either don't like or think should have been done differently. There's a difference between what a plothole is, and what you didn't like and think should be done differently. That's why when discussing things that you simply didn't care for...if you think that strongly on them...you should go write your own stuff.

How about finding one actual...REAL plothole. I gave you an example of what one could be, and that actually is a rather strong indication of what one of the plotholes in the game could be...

Convince me of your problems with the actual plotholes instead of your dislikes and I'll probably be much more amenable...but I see it over and over where people try to attack a game or something based on their dislikes of something rather than real problems with the game (dislikes would be...I hated the graphics. Problems would be...the game uninstall program uninstalled my OS as well).

I'm not trying to convince you of anything, I'm simply telling you why you haven't convinced me. You're the one that has the onus and put down the items originally...I wasn't convinced. I still am not. I'd say probably try a different plot hole since you don't seem to be going anywhere on the ones you listed and in fact are going in circles on your dislikes instead of anything convincing me of plotholes.

If you don't want to actually look at why you haven't convinced me and go a different route, go ahead and keep on not convincing...otherwise I've already told you why I'm not convinced...you don't need to go over the same things again.

#576
Oblarg

Oblarg

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 878 posts

I'm really not interested in actual, reasoned discussion.


There, paraphrased that for you. Why, exactly, are you still posting?

#577
greylord

greylord

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1053 posts

I'm really not interested in actual, reasoned discussion.


There, paraphrased that for you. Why, exactly, are you still posting?


Why don't you say what you said you would?

You were the one who brought up plot holes. You didn't convince me of any from your viewpoint. All you brought up were things you either didn't like or would have done differently, and then you explained how.

I simply wasn't convinced. I'm awaiting your LOOONG list of supposed plotholes that you vaunted...or was that small bunch of dislikes everything you had?

I don't need to convince you of anything...that was never my purpose nor my reason. I pointed out why I didn't believe you. You still haven't stated why I should believe you.

Why don't you actualy post what you stated you had...because if that's all the problems with plotholes that you had with ME2, your list is actually shorter then a majority of those that I've seen!

Hence, I'm REALLY not convinced in that case of anything with your supposed plothole problems you brought up. I'm posting because I'm actually hoping you may have told the truth...rather than shooting out stuff because you do dislike bio and ME and are simply spouting that opinion rather than anything cohesive.

#578
Oblarg

Oblarg

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 878 posts

You were the one who brought up plot holes. You didn't convince me of any from your viewpoint.


Good for you. If you're not willing to discuss why you find them unconvincing, then you're essentially ruling out any possibility of reasoned discussion.

You see, the fact that you disagree with me means nothing. Other people in this thread disagree with me, too. The fundamental difference is that their responses are well-reasoned and geared towards promoting a discussion. You, on the other hand, seem interested in little more than the ideological equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and shouting "you're wrong!"

Edited by Oblarg, 06 February 2012 - 03:34 PM.


#579
greylord

greylord

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1053 posts


You were the one who brought up plot holes. You didn't convince me of any from your viewpoint.


Good for you. If you're not willing to discuss why you find them unconvincing, then you're essentially ruling out any possibility of reasoned discussion.

You see, the fact that you disagree with me means nothing. Other people in this thread disagree with me, too. The fundamental difference is that their responses are well-reasoned and geared towards promoting a discussion. You, on the other hand, seem interested in little more than the ideological equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and shouting "you're wrong!"


No, it just seems you didn't pay heed to what I posted before. In fact some of it you actually blatantly ignored. Put a frigate today against a cruiser of WWI...I'd might actually wager the Frigate may win...however...that aside, even with that, you completely missed the point. Further, just with the frigate/cruiser problem, even if you ignored the real reason and point of it...you never answered why a frigate that survived a reaper and even took down a reaper should be shot down by a Collector cruiser which according to you is far weaker than the aforementioned Reaper...nor did you answer why something two times as big, powerful, and sleek than something that withstood a reaper and took it down later would have a problem with your Collector theory if the collector is indeed much weaker than that aforementioned Reaper.

Beyond ignoring this little point, you make it more blatant that it's more you complaining about things you don't like when you ignore the other side of the equation. If you have problems with an unupgraded Normandy surviving and crashing...why DON'T YOU have a problem with a fully upgraded Normandy with the latest tech (enough to cut through the Collector ship as easily as it cut through the original Normandy even) also crashing and having problems. It's a two sided coin of which you only point out one side. It implies that you aren't actually trying to find plotholes, but more that you are concerned with things you didn't like and would have written differently if you were in charge...and which doubtless would have some other youngster who didn't like your version go ranting on a forum about how it's a complete loophole.

I explained (in one post though, so not multiple...I don't plan on going round and round in circles like you have, I assume you can read, though you might wonder since I just reposted some unanswered points that you ignored) already the real reason why the Normandy is not destroyed and also has problems and crashes into the Collector base.

I could go on, with various reasons why you haven't convinced me. However it's irrelavant if you actually have so many "plotholes" as you infer. Your list isn't that long, and if you had so many, than you could go listing them on and on and on.

I might be a fanboi as some may put it, but I'm not oblivious. As far as a game goes, I'd rather have a fun enjoyable one with a fast moving story and defined goals (even if minor steps with each character recruitment and then loyalty missions) then a meandering mess that really doesn't go anywhere, plotholes and all. I won't deny plotholes, but I want you to at least be honest whether you actually have plotholes (which for what it appears you do not) or you simply didn't like how the game was written.

It doesn't bother me if you didn't like how it was written. That's an opinion, and that's pretty solid. I'm don't even think that opinion can be changed at this point. It' sjust as solid as me loving ME2. If you simply dislike how it's written, then that's actually a far stronger argument than what you've posted thus far.

If you are going to blame some of it on plotholes and multitudes of them, than at least be honest about them and start listing. I have what I would call, questionable items that lie unanswered...which some may call plotholes...and even I could list more than you have...and probably more clear cut as to what many would call plotholes (in the like of what my example would be above...not that...but in a similar vein). I'm not disagreeing about plotholes in ME2 (that's the THIRD TIME I've said that thus far...but you don't seem to actually read what I post so not certain if it will catch this time), I'm saying your attempt to convince me that what you listed as plotholes are actually plotholes doesn't ring true...AND that your real gripe is simply...as I just stated...that you don't like how it's written and would have preferred events to occur differently.

Hopefully you can back up your original claim, hence start listing all your plotholes...otherwise you sound more like a disgruntled player of ME2 who is playing armchair general of what they'd have done different. No problem with that, but at least be honest with yourself and us.

PS: One last thing, I actually read this thread more for news on ME3...love to hear more about it rather then some person's gripes about ME2. It's actually far easier to browse these forums for information than Bio's...theirs moves rather quickly, and this place seems to get the news all consolidated in a more accessible nature (one thread) that seems to be more comprehensive with it's total web coverage (find things here that I occasionally don't at Bio's).

Edited by greylord, 06 February 2012 - 06:11 PM.


#580
Malcador

Malcador

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 5204 posts
  • Location:Someplace in Canada
  • Xbox Gamertag:Pft, consoles.
  • Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
See, this is why we need a Versus forum. Maybe we can bet on the contestants.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users