Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

A suggestion regarding multiclassing

single class multi class multiclass multiclassing balance progression

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1
hvitasky

hvitasky

    (0) Nub

  • Initiates
  • 1 posts

Hi!

I am happy both for PoE2 being made as well as multiclassing making the cut.

If single class characters were to be treated closer to how multi class characters will work a lot of the balancing issues can be sidestepped.

If you were to add a second duplicate of each class which either is only available to main class characters, or as a virtual second class for single class characters.
The comparative progression of single versus multi class characters would balance out more nicely.

Consider the following example:

 

Class/Power source + Class/Power source

-----

Wizard + Fighter -> Battlemage

Wizard + Wizard2 -> Wizard


Were Wizard2 could contain more horizontal progression for Wizards, and/or unlock a few perks/talents only available to single class characters. (Though this might not be necessary, and is only an additional suggestion.)



#2
MaxQuest

MaxQuest

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2358 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

You can have 54 points in a single power source at most.

If you would be able to select wizard2, you would be able to achieve 72 points in arcane. There is no way you would balance that under presented by JS system.

Or you would like to have arcane2 or arcane_horizontal?







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: single class, multi class, multiclass, multiclassing, balance, progression

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users