AnjyBelle Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 (edited) It was in 2001, when Gothic 1 was released. It had an open world and almost no so called zoning. This was amazing at that time, when e.g. the devs of Baldurs Gate defended the zoning with arguments like "gaming would only happen on high end PCs, if we had the entire (game-)world in 'one piece'." Perhaps that was correct. My PC had 256 MB RAM at that time. Indeed, for Gothic 1 I had to spend about 100 DM (~ 50 US$) to upgrade my RAM to 512 MB. But then it ran flawlessly AND without useless time consuming because of countless zonings. If someone would ask me, if there is something I dislike about PoE, then there is just that sole exception: Ways too much zonings. Example (mild spoiler): When we decide to go for the peaceful ending in the lighthouse quest, we have to zone from Lillith one level down, another level down, out to Ondra's Gift, then to Brackenbury, into the Charred Barrel, up one level. That's six zonings for one way and then three for the way back to the questgiver. Altogether nine zonings. On my current PC one transition takes about 20-30 seconds. You can imagine, how much time we stare at the "zoning screen" throughout the entire game. My question: Gothic 1 was just one game which showed (14 years ago!) that it is possible to make games in "one piece". There were several in the meantime. Nevertheless, even top developers like Obsidian, BioWare etc. resort to this - in my eyes - ancient technique of cutting the game world in pieces and let the player stare at their loading screens. Must that really be? Are there still arguments like in the 90s ("... runs only on high end....")? Edited September 14, 2015 by AnjyBelle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLPuSHeR Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Are you running the game from a regular hard disk or from ssd? I feel your frustation 20-30s per loading zone seems too much. If I recall correctly loading was quite snappy on my SSD (maybe around 5-10s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnjyBelle Posted September 14, 2015 Author Share Posted September 14, 2015 Are you running the game from a regular hard disk or from ssd? I feel your frustation 20-30s per loading zone seems too much. If I recall correctly loading was quite snappy on my SSD (maybe around 5-10s). On a HD. Ok, not all loadings are that long. I tried to estimate the average time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLPuSHeR Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 It's a bit long even for an average estimate. I understand your frustration. That's why I invested on a SSD just for my games partition. I knew it would not give me more FPS, but the loading times are sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnjyBelle Posted September 14, 2015 Author Share Posted September 14, 2015 Ok, I see. But it's not only about loading times. The question is about the need of zoning in particular. You invested in a SSD, I'd invest happily in another 8 GB of RAM, if I could get an open world for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lameover Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 (edited) Open world. With pre-rendered backgrounds. Sweet. Arcanum comes to mind Edited September 14, 2015 by lameover Sorry for my bad english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starwars Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Not of particular help to PoE but they said in one of the recent panels that they'd like to develop a system for PoE2 where all interiors within a particular exterior (say Copperlane district) wouldn't need a loading screen. That would've helped immensely in this game even if it wouldn't be a "seamless" world so to speak. 1 Listen to my home-made recordings (some original songs, some not): http://www.youtube.c...low=grid&view=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globalCooldown Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 On the one hand: places like the lighthouse could definitely benefit from not having to go through loading screens just to go up a floor. On the other hand: for open-world areas, like Black Meadow and Magran's Fork, you're suddenly looking at A LOT MORE WORK defining all those square miles of terrain. If done well, you're going to get a bit of an Elder Scrolls vibe, marching through a wide open world as you see fit. If done poorly, it'll just serve to make the world empty. So, I think the system Starwars up there is talking about is a good compromise. I stream every Friday at 9pm EST: http://www.twitch.tv/ladaarehn Currently streaming: KOTOR 2. Pillars of Eternity homebrew tabletop thread: https://forums.obsidian.net/topic/84662-pillars-of-eternity-homebrew-wip/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrumpyGoesWest Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I don't know if this is my imagination or not but I'll sometimes go through my old saves and delete the ones I don't really need or want and my loading times aren't too bad on my standard hd. The only reason why I feel the loading times are somewhat excusable is because the game is just too damn good and the artwork is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnjyBelle Posted September 14, 2015 Author Share Posted September 14, 2015 Not of particular help to PoE but they said in one of the recent panels that they'd like to develop a system for PoE2 where all interiors within a particular exterior (say Copperlane district) wouldn't need a loading screen. That would've helped immensely in this game even if it wouldn't be a "seamless" world so to speak. For me that would be more than enough, because especially in towns you run from one zone into the next. I wouldn't mind a loading screen if I go from my fortress to another area, e.g. Magram's Fork. When I explore such an area for the first time, I won't see the next loading screen soon. So, "open towns" would be a good compromise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Stalker Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Open world. With pre-rendered backgrounds. Sweet. Arcanum comes to mind Arcanum was tile-based, just like Fallout 1 and 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkathellar Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Gothic 1 was just one game which showed (14 years ago!) that it is possible to make games in "one piece". There were several in the meantime. Nevertheless, even top developers like Obsidian, BioWare etc. resort to this - in my eyes - ancient technique of cutting the game world in pieces and let the player stare at their loading screens. Must that really be? Are there still arguments like in the 90s ("... runs only on high end....")? You say all of this as if open world gameplay is objectively superior; something ubiquitouslty desireable, the absence of which needs to be excused. This is untrue. Open world gameplay demands a particular style and makeup, and that's not suitable for every game. Putting aside whatever Bioware's devs said at the time, if BG1 had been an open world game, it would have been a fundamentally different beast. Rather than challenging PoE to explain why it's not an open world game, I challenge you to explain why it should be. Obnoxious load times are not a viable explanation - that just means the engine needs to be optimized. How would my adventures in the Dyrwood be improved with the addition of an open world? Not of particular help to PoE but they said in one of the recent panels that they'd like to develop a system for PoE2 where all interiors within a particular exterior (say Copperlane district) wouldn't need a loading screen. That would've helped immensely in this game even if it wouldn't be a "seamless" world so to speak. It's a proven concept. Shadowrun Returns already does it (stylishly, I might add), and it was a pretty ubiquitous trick in NWN modding. They should definitely do it. If I'm typing in red, it means I'm being sarcastic. But not this time. Dark green, on the other hand, is for jokes and irony in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now