Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

(DPS) vs (Accuracy - Deflection). Here's the maths. Enjoy.

DPS Accuracy Attack Deflection Attack Resolution Combat Calculation Minmax

  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

#1
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

I've noticed some people asking about how much damage increase a point of Accuracy is worth. I've also noticed some people making incorrect arguments based on incorrect information. So I figured "Hey, I'm an engineer. I'll do some maths." So I did.

 

Here's the maths. It's a plot of your average dps (relative to the base damage) versus your accuracy. Calculated using the rules given in the wiki for combat rolls as of today.

 

Attached File  Capture.JPG   72.93KB   26 downloads.

 

This can be used (among other things) to tell when (if anywhere - hint, it's nowhere) DEX gives you more damage than MIG. Summary below:

 

Accuracy/Deflection within 5 points:

Marginal gain/loss for 1 Accuracy: 1.5% dps (relative to base dmg)

 

Accuracy/Deflection within 5-45 points:

Marginal gain/loss for 1 Accuracy: 1% dps (relative to base dmg)

 

Accuracy/Deflection outside 45 points:

Marginal gain/loss for 1 Accuracy: 0.5% dps (relative to base dmg)

 

There are the numbers. All other things being equal, the Accuracy bonus from DEX always gives you less dps increase than the damage bonus from MIG. When fighting enemies with Deflection much higher or lower than your Accuracy, each 2 points of Accuracy is equivalent to 1 point of MIG (where dps is concerned, that is. dps isn't everything of course).

 

Please take this math into account when making arguments about stats, power, the value of inherent Accuracy bonuses (boni?), the value of DEX relative to MIG, etc.

 

I'm done mathing for tonight. Peace. :)

 

PS - Source file for doing your own maths:

New Excel: https://dl.dropboxus...y DPS calc.xlsx

Old Excel: https://dl.dropboxus...ty DPS calc.xls

 

 

EDIT: A quick note about why DEX, while giving less damage than MIG, isn't unilaterally inferior to it.

 

DEX affects Reflex save instead of Fort save. This lets you dodge AoE attacks. Also, the % increases in dps I've calculated also apply to spell/ability duration increases/decreases on graze/crit, which aren't affected by MIG at all as far as I know.

 

So for scripted interactions that take DEX, characters who want to dodge AoE attacks, and characters who are more interested in getting long duration abilities/spells by critting with them, DEX is better. There may also be one-off abilities/passives that give bonuses from DEX as well - I'd imagine the rogue will have some.


Edited by Matt516, 22 August 2014 - 09:40 PM.

  • Leferd, Rostere, Headbomb and 20 others like this

#2
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

I give anyone and everyone full reign to reference this when arguing about mechanics. ;P



#3
Leferd

Leferd

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2906 posts
  • Location:California Republic
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!
Cool. It'll come handy -atleast until Josh, Tim, and crew decide to change the values.
  • Matt516 likes this

#4
Sensuki

Sensuki

    Subway Apathist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 9965 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Steam:STEAM_0:1:1229809
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Have you taken into account weapon speeds?

 

Because I don't think you have

 

Animation speed is 30 FPS

 

Recovery time mirrors the action animation.

 

Fast Melee Weapons have 20 frame animation, 20 frame recovery unarmored

Normal 1H and 2h Weapons have 30 fps animation

 

Weapon styles:

Two weapons: not sure of exact mathematics, but the fastest combo is a rapier and a stiletto, recovery time is very small

 

Single 1H no shield: +50% recovery time, +15 Accuracy

2H Weapon: +50% recovery time

 

Normal 1H with no shield/no armor has 30 frame animation and 45 frame recovery

2H weapon/no armor has 30 frame animation and 45 frame recovery 


Edited by Sensuki, 22 August 2014 - 09:14 PM.

  • Karkarov likes this

#5
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Cool. It'll come handy -atleast until Josh, Tim, and crew decide to change the values.

 

Well - if I'm still lurking here (I expect I will be) I'll update it. :)



#6
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Have you taken into account weapon speeds?

 

Because I don't think you have

 

Doesn't matter. I'm calculating dps, not damage per hit. :)
 

EDIT: Ok, I'm calculating damage per hit too. Still - doesn't matter. The comparisons between MIG and DEX are the same.

 

I'm not taking DT into account though. Too complicated and it has absolutely zero bearing on the attributes argument (MIG vs DEX and the value of Accuracy), which is the main reason I wrote this. :p


Edited by Matt516, 22 August 2014 - 09:23 PM.

  • keysersoze likes this

#7
Answermancer

Answermancer

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 284 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Xbox Gamertag:Answermancer
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

Cool, I wonder why they decided to make Dex give a smaller increase than Might, I'm sure they did this math as well.

 

Seems like they should nerf Might slightly and things would be better.



#8
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Cool, I wonder why they decided to make Dex give a smaller increase than Might, I'm sure they did this math as well.

 

Seems like they should nerf Might slightly and things would be better.

 

Well... DEX affects Reflex save instead of Fort save. Aaaand..... the % increases in dps I've calculated also apply to spell/ability duration increases/decreases on graze/crit, which aren't affected by MIG at all as far as I know.

 

So for scripted interactions that take DEX, characters who want high reflexes, and characters who rely on critting with duration spells for extra duration, DEX would be better.

 

It does seem a bit weak, still.


Edited by Matt516, 22 August 2014 - 09:14 PM.


#9
Sensuki

Sensuki

    Subway Apathist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 9965 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Steam:STEAM_0:1:1229809
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Doesn't matter. I'm calculating dps, not damage per hit. :)


Weapon speed affects DPS.

Shouldn't you be saying the other way around?

You're calculating damage per hit, not DPS.
  • Karkarov and morhilane like this

#10
Ganrich

Ganrich

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1463 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Although, Perception is largely considered "not as useful" I would go Dex over might for a interrupt build.  If I hit more consistently then my chances to interrupt go up.  It's one of those situations where a Dex build might see more tangible benefits from being more utilitarian over raw damage.  While high dex, and decent Perception, would do solid damage.  Just not as much as might.  However, it would stop some damage from coming in... which is good.  I feel dex is still in a good place.

 

Awesome work btw.

EDIT:  I realize this post was out of left field, but I felt like sharing my thoughts.


Edited by Ganrich, 22 August 2014 - 09:16 PM.

  • Karkarov and JFSOCC like this

#11
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Have you taken into account weapon speeds?

 

Because I don't think you have

 

Animation speed is 30 FPS

 

Recovery time mirrors the action animation.

 

Fast Melee Weapons have 20 frame animation, 20 frame recovery unarmored

Normal 1H and 2h Weapons have 30 fps animation

 

Weapon styles:

Two weapons: not sure of exact mathematics, but the fastest combo is a rapier and a stiletto, recovery time is very small

 

Single 1H no shield: +50% recovery time, +15 Accuracy

2H Weapon: +50% recovery time

 

Normal 1H with no shield/no armor has 30 frame animation and 45 frame recovery

2H weapon/no armor has 30 frame animation and 45 frame recovery 

 

Doesn't matter. Trust me. Dps is calculated as your average damage per second. Base dps is your weapon damage multiplied by your attacks per second. Changes to dps from graze/crit aren't affected by this attack speed because dps is damage per second - the time dependency is already accounted for.


  • keysersoze likes this

#12
Sensuki

Sensuki

    Subway Apathist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 9965 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Steam:STEAM_0:1:1229809
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Right, so you mean independent of weapon styles.

 

Good post anyway, I think the general consensus was that Might was overpowered Dexterity is underpowered. I've seen pics of 19 Might / 3 Dex and it's actually really good lol.


Edited by Sensuki, 22 August 2014 - 09:23 PM.


#13
Answermancer

Answermancer

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 284 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Xbox Gamertag:Answermancer
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

 

Cool, I wonder why they decided to make Dex give a smaller increase than Might, I'm sure they did this math as well.

 

Seems like they should nerf Might slightly and things would be better.

 

Well... DEX affects Reflex save instead of Fort save. Aaaand..... the % increases in dps I've calculated also apply to spell/ability duration increases/decreases on graze/crit, which aren't affected by MIG at all as far as I know.

 

So for scripted interactions that take DEX, characters who want high reflexes, and characters who rely on critting with duration spells for extra duration, DEX would be better.

 

It does seem a bit weak, still.

 

 

Sounds like they could reduce the Might bonus to 1.5% or lower and that might help a bit with it seeming overpowered.

 

Weapon speed affects DPS.

Shouldn't you be saying the other way around?

You're calculating damage per hit, not DPS.

 

DPS is DPS, I'm not sure why it would matter? All Accuracy does for damage is increase crit chance and lower glance/miss chance, those chances are the same for a slow or a fast weapon so the way they affect DPS is the same (a faster weapon makes more total attacks but the same distribution of glances/hits/misses/crits as a slow one).


Edited by Answermancer, 22 August 2014 - 09:19 PM.

  • Matt516 likes this

#14
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Right, so you mean independent of weapon styles.

 

Yes. The results in this plot are completely independent of weapon styles. A 5% increase to average damage on something that hits a lot is the same as a 5% increase to average damage on something that hits slowly. When you bring DT into the mix, things could get complicated - different weapon styles do benefit differently in different situations due to the effect of DT.

 

But I'm not interested in that. As I said, I'm only interested in weighing the change in basic dps caused by stat changes. I can compare MIG and DEX completely fairly and DT/weapon styles don't matter one bit, because the damage increase from MIG and DEX will be affected the same by that DT and weapon styles.

 

TL;DR - DT/weapon speed doesn't matter when comparing increases in dps from DEX and MIG. Or to put it another way - the increases in dps from DEX I've calculated and the ones from MIG are applied to your dps before DT and weapon speeds start affecting dps. After these increases are applied, then your dps is further reduced by armor. It's that reduction which will be affected by DT and weapon speed. Hope that clears things up. :)


Edited by Matt516, 22 August 2014 - 09:33 PM.

  • Leferd and Answermancer like this

#15
Stun

Stun

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2857 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
Thank you for this, sir. We need more threads like this. I want to learn the system. Actually we all need to, otherwise our mechanics-based feedback is worthless to the devs
 

It does seem a bit weak, still.

Disappointingly weak, actually. Rogues are the class that gets the high end Accuracy scores, yet it looks like Might will be the stat to pump if you want them to play their dev-stated role of "heavy hitter".


<shakes head>

C'mon josh. Grow your backbone and turbo charge these stats already

Edited by Stun, 22 August 2014 - 09:44 PM.

  • Sigfenmil, Ganrich, Matt516 and 1 other like this

#16
Sensuki

Sensuki

    Subway Apathist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 9965 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Steam:STEAM_0:1:1229809
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

The attributes aren't really impactful as it is (other than Intellect), I think bumping Dex would be better than Nerfing Might.


Edited by Sensuki, 22 August 2014 - 09:31 PM.

  • JFSOCC likes this

#17
limaxophobiacq

limaxophobiacq

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 601 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

 

 

Cool, I wonder why they decided to make Dex give a smaller increase than Might, I'm sure they did this math as well.

 

Seems like they should nerf Might slightly and things would be better.

 

Well... DEX affects Reflex save instead of Fort save. Aaaand..... the % increases in dps I've calculated also apply to spell/ability duration increases/decreases on graze/crit, which aren't affected by MIG at all as far as I know.

 

So for scripted interactions that take DEX, characters who want high reflexes, and characters who rely on critting with duration spells for extra duration, DEX would be better.

 

It does seem a bit weak, still.

 

 

Sounds like they could reduce the Might bonus to 1.5% or lower and that might help a bit with it seeming overpowered.

 

I'd much rather they increased it to 3%, had Dex give +2 Accuracy, and doubled the effects of the rest of the Attributes as well so you actually felt a difference. If they want to avoid fractional percentages which it seems like they do doubling would also let them balance it a bit more granularly.


Edited by limaxophobiacq, 22 August 2014 - 09:36 PM.

  • Sigfenmil likes this

#18
Answermancer

Answermancer

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 284 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Xbox Gamertag:Answermancer
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

The attributes aren't really impactful as it is (other than Intellect), I think bumping Dex would be better than Nerfing Might.

 

You're probably right. I really like high-Dex crit-happy characters too so I'd be all for it on a personal level ;P



#19
limaxophobiacq

limaxophobiacq

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 601 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Something to take into account is that the actuall bonus damage increase of raising Might by 1 point isn't actually 2% of your current damage, but 2% of base damage, so if you're at Might 15 rasing to 16 its only a (132/130=1,0154) 1,54% actual damage increase. So it's possible the current balance between Dex and Might is actually fine. (Though I still think all attributes could stant to have a lot more impact).

 

This is obviously true for all stats except Dex and gets more noticable the higher stats get; the higher your stat, the less another +1 matters (20 int to 21 only gives +2,5% actual increase in area/duration). Personally I don't think this is very good design given how it disincentivizes exceptional Attributes.


Edited by limaxophobiacq, 22 August 2014 - 09:58 PM.


#20
Matt516

Matt516

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1159 posts
  • Steam:Pungent Raindeer King
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer

Something to take into account is that the actuall bonus damage increase of raising Might by 1 point isn't actually 2% of your current damage, but 2% of base damage, so if you're at Might 15 rasing to 16 its only a (132/130=1,0154) 1,54% actual damage increase. So it's possible the current balance between Dex and Might is actually fine. (Though I still think all attributes could stant to have a lot more impact).

 

Is that correct though? That would be an awfully complicated way of applying the bonus. Any reason it wouldn't just be the much simpler 1.30 * base damage ---> 1.32 * base damage? (for 15 MIG to 16 MIG)

 

EDIT: I might understand what you're saying - you're calculating the percentage damage increase an additional point of MIG gives you from your previous MIG-adjusted damage. Fair enough. But the same thing would apply to the increases in damage from DEX/Accuracy (I'm pretty sure) so I don't think it makes a difference. The values I've calculated for Accuracy dps increase are relative to base, as is the 2% value for MIG. So MIG is still 2X the damage increase of DEX at the 5-45 point disparity mark and 1.33X the damage increase of DEX at the <5 point disparity mark.


Edited by Matt516, 22 August 2014 - 10:07 PM.

  • Sigfenmil likes this





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: DPS, Accuracy, Attack, Deflection, Attack Resolution, Combat, Calculation, Minmax

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users