metadigital Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 If I remember correctly, Judge's hate for Ubisoft comes from the company being responsible for PoR2. However, he also said that he hates the company because it wasn't responsible for the game. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, it's the StarForce copy-protection they employ, I thought. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Gorth Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 No, it's the StarForce copy-protection they employ, I thought. *Sigh* As a rule of thumb, if I can find a no-cd patch for a game, I'll buy the game, if not, I leave it to rot on the shelf. If I had known that the patched Kotor2 wouldn't work with no-cd patches, I would never have gotten it in the first place “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
metadigital Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Yes, but Hades is performing a boycott. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Diogo Ribeiro Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 I just don't get robbing a hard working developer of the chance at success because of the publisher. When a game stinks, I blame the developer. Sometimes the publisher rushes the product (ok, usually) but it always comes down to the developers skill. When I buy a book, I don't look at the publisher, I look at the author. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sometimes an above average to good title will slip through the cracks of gamer attention span because a publisher did not care to advertise it. This is most definitely not a problem with developers as they don't always have an active hand in that matter, and it's not accurate to blame a developer for this. Beyond Good and Evil's reception was rather poor because Ubisoft made almost no effort to promote it, despite being well received by critics. Another example seems to be Bethesda's treatment of Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, which looks like it isn't being able to make much of a name for itself even with reviews between acceptable and enthusiastic.
Setzer Posted April 12, 2006 Author Posted April 12, 2006 The Starforce copy protection will not be used in the retail copy of HoMM V. Nival, just recently, had a change of heart and decided to do away with it.
metadigital Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 The Starforce copy protection will not be used in the retail copy of HoMM V. Nival, just recently, had a change of heart and decided to do away with it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I am not sure if that will stop Hades from exercising his protest vote, after all Ubisoft use it on Chaos Theory ... " OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
baby arm Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Like Setzer said This is awesome news. I hope it boosts their sales like crazy.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 He's got a Pikachu avatar I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Daaave Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Pikachu ftw. (w00t) Just because you're a bit thinner than your even fatter mum it doesn't mean you're in excellent physical shape, if you could fit through the door and view the normal people you'd notice that cheeseburger boy. Squid suck.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Yeah I'm going to buy one now. Even though I'll likely never play it. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Llyranor Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Yeah, you should buy all the games that don't use Starforce that you will never play. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Mother says good taste should be rewarded. I'm rewarding him for his taste in Avatars. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Llyranor Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Erm.... yeah. Start buying me games. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 12, 2006 Posted April 12, 2006 Erm.... yeah. Start buying me games. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nice try. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
metadigital Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Like Setzer said This is awesome news. I hope it boosts their sales like crazy. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Now Hades has to decide whether his principles would be best served by boycotting Ubisoft completely, or buying this game because they decided not to use StarForce ... " OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Judge Hades Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 I am still not buying an UbiSoft game. PoOR 2 was so bad due to incompetence that I will never buy a UbiSoft or Stormfront game.
Krookie Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 I see your point, but they have released a lot of good games. Splinter Cell(s) Brothers in Arms (I know not many peopel on the forum like them, but I do) Rainbow 6 Ghost Recon And that's just some I can think of at the moment.
Judge Hades Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Not my preferred genre. In any case I will not buy a UbiSoft game just like I will not buy an EA game.
Llyranor Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Red Steel might be worth a rental. Come to think of it, I haven't played a Ubisoft game in a long time, aside from the HOMM5 beta. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 I played Blazing Angels. I wish I hadnt, but not much I can do about it. Ubi do publish quite a bit of stuff that would otherwise not reach these shores so that makes them worth supporting. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Krookie Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Not my preferred genre. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not really mine either. The only reason I like Brothers in Arms (other then the fact that I'm a WWII junkie) is the control you have over some of the guys. Personally, I don't really like CoD2's single player because of the run and gun action. The multiplayer is fun though.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 I don't like modern warfare. GRAW was decent but I didnt really enjoy it that much. Ace Combat was very good but again I didnt really enjoy the modern warfare aspect. Blazing Angels was WWII but was abysmal.. Someones got to get the two elements right one of these days. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now