Gabrielle Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 The point of a roleplaying game is to be the FedEx man with guns! Fixed! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes! With big guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderAndrew Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The point of a roleplaying game is to be the FedEx man with guns! Fixed! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes! With big guns. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And big packages. Wait, that was Darque's line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The point of a roleplaying game is to be the FedEx man with guns! Fixed! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes! With big guns. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And big packages. Wait, that was Darque's line. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Get your mail order nanny yet? EA isn't that bad. They still make some good games, RA2 comes to mind as the last one I can think of. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleCookiee Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 (edited) EA isn't that bad. They still make some good games, RA2 comes to mind as the last one I can think of. That wasn't EA. That was WestWood. Ofcourse they had to kill that company and stuffed them in a in-house EA team. Result: Generals and that kind of nonsense. Soon to be raped: Red Alert (with itteration 3) EDIT: And just from taking a look at *all PC games EA made (games from the good old quasi-quality way not included obviously)*: Not a single good game to be found Edited September 28, 2005 by Battlewookiee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fishboot Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Seven Cities of Gold was great. Best game made by a transexual evar. Except MULE, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderAndrew Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Best game made by a transexual evar. Except MULE, of course. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And FOOL, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fishboot Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 (edited) I think that gaming will be officially considered culturally important when Dan/Dani Bunten is made the subject of a hero biopic. Edit - I don't know what FOOL is. Edited September 28, 2005 by Fishboot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderAndrew Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Fallout Online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Fallout Online. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK! Don't say such thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderAndrew Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 And yet FOOL is clearly the best game made by a transsexual, ever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 EA isn't that bad. They still make some good games, RA2 comes to mind as the last one I can think of. That wasn't EA. That was WestWood. Ofcourse they had to kill that company and stuffed them in a in-house EA team. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> that (the game) came after westwood was purchased by EA. The catalyst for the purchase of Westwood was the flop known as Tiberian Sun. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deraldin Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Soon to be raped: Red Alert (with itteration 3) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It could still be good. There is still a chance! :'( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I thought Red Alert 2 was good. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deraldin Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I thought Red Alert 2 was good. <_< <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was enjoyable although it didn't quite mesh well with the style of the original. :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 and generals did? Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deraldin Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 and generals did? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Generals isn't a Command and Conquer game. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laozi Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 what about the Toxic Tractors and rocket buggies, wheres the love? People laugh when I say that I think a jellyfish is one of the most beautiful things in the world. What they don't understand is, I mean a jellyfish with long, blond hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 and generals did? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Generals isn't a Command and Conquer game. <_< <{POST_SNAPBACK}> According to the title it was... Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deraldin Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 and generals did? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Generals isn't a Command and Conquer game. <_< <{POST_SNAPBACK}> According to the title it was... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Title means nothing. It wasn't a Command and Conquer game. It may have been based off of the C&C franchise but it wasn't a part of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I thought Red Alert 2 was good. <_< <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was enjoyable although it didn't quite mesh well with the style of the original. :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Never played the original Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.E. Sawyer Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 When I look at EA internal development, I see a bunch of titles I don't like. When I look at EA external development, I see some games I definitely like (Battlefield 2, for instance). When I look at UbiSoft, I see the opposite: internal games I like, external games I'm not a fan of. I would be concerned about what would happen to my favorite UbiSoft franchises underwent the EA process. Then again, I was pretty annoyed with how Prince of Persia 2 turned out. "No, the developers were" of course you fail to mention that there were multiple developers for the game, and the only Ubisoft wnated out of the game was to be able to beat NWN to amrket so they claim to have 'the first 3E D&D CRPG ever'. We also saw how that abckfired. Sure, the devs have to accept blame; but so does the publisher. Nice try, though. Thanks for the scoop, well-informed corporate insider! twitter tyme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I have to agree with JE. Mainly because EA is allowing their "contracter" to have more freedom in making their games, while on the inside they run things like an olden sweat shop, thus quality suffers Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderAndrew Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 When I look at EA internal development, I see a bunch of titles I don't like. When I look at EA external development, I see some games I definitely like (Battlefield 2, for instance). When I look at UbiSoft, I see the opposite: internal games I like, external games I'm not a fan of. I would be concerned about what would happen to my favorite UbiSoft franchises underwent the EA process. Then again, I was pretty annoyed with how Prince of Persia 2 turned out. "No, the developers were" of course you fail to mention that there were multiple developers for the game, and the only Ubisoft wnated out of the game was to be able to beat NWN to amrket so they claim to have 'the first 3E D&D CRPG ever'. We also saw how that abckfired. Sure, the devs have to accept blame; but so does the publisher. Nice try, though. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks for the scoop, well-informed corporate insider! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wasn't IWD2 the first 3E D&D CRPG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowstrider Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 No. PoR2 predates it by a lot. There might've been another before that, even - I just don't recall one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Didn't IWD 2 was released after NWN? I consider NWN to be the real first 3e DnD game/ POoR2 didn't even have Wizards, Druids, and Gnomes along with a lot of the baseline rules right. IWD2 was as close to 3e as the Infinity Engine allowed and I think thebest rules set out of all the IE games. Man, I would love to play the other IE games using IWD2's rules system. :D But I wouldn't consider it 3e. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now