Kaftan Barlast Posted May 8, 2005 Author Posted May 8, 2005 "Die, you piece of **** and go suck **** on an aeorplane!" Clean trans. "Die, piece of excrement, and go practise fellatio aboard an aeroplane" edit: You need to stop GOOGLEing so much, Baley. Its not good for your health. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 8, 2005 Author Posted May 8, 2005 How do ya know I'm not a die hard Tool fan? Because I know you well, better than anyone. I know you better than I know myself :D but to more essential things. This is from my recent discovery of "Lady Death re-Imagined", yet another alternative timeline where Lady D is a french girl named Faith(instead of Hope) that looses her soul when she drinks form the cursed grail. Here she lures her poor best friend into whoring herself out to the guard so she can sneak into their armoury and steal... a guardsmans armour that just happens to be some scanty concoction complete wity bustier and garters, cross-dressing guards perhaps? ..note the carefully inserted innuendos "..guys are small" and "youve had plenty of practice before..". Shocking! DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Berserk Posted May 8, 2005 Posted May 8, 2005 What I never will understand is why all these "super chicks" feel the need to go into battle wearing high heel stilettos? Apparently they are not only going to kill some forces of darkness but also going on a blood ball as well.
Drakron Posted May 8, 2005 Posted May 8, 2005 What I never will understand is why all these "super chicks" feel the need to go into battle wearing high heel stilettos? Apparently they are not only going to kill some forces of darkness but also going on a blood ball as well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's simple. They work like daggers.
Diogo Ribeiro Posted May 8, 2005 Posted May 8, 2005 What I never will understand is why all these "super chicks" feel the need to go into battle wearing high heel stilettos? Apparently they are not only going to kill some forces of darkness but also going on a blood ball as well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Teenage male fantasies vanquish all evil and darkness. And rational explanations.
Berserk Posted May 8, 2005 Posted May 8, 2005 What I never will understand is why all these "super chicks" feel the need to go into battle wearing high heel stilettos? Apparently they are not only going to kill some forces of darkness but also going on a blood ball as well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Teenage male fantasies vanquish all evil and darkness. And rational explanations. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Apparently they do.... Too bad that this kind of comics didn't die out with Spawn.
213374U Posted May 8, 2005 Posted May 8, 2005 Here she lures her poor best friend into whoring herself out to the guard so she can sneak into their armoury and steal... a guardsmans armour that just happens to be some scanty concoction complete wity bustier and garters, cross-dressing guards perhaps? Intriguing indeed. I'd say the most likely explanation is that she is just stealing the guards' bondage/fetish party stuff. Nobody said that being a guard in the garrison had to be boring. They are entitled to some fun, too. Or perhaps those are armors like the ones from NWN, that magically change shape depending on who puts them in their inventory. " - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 8, 2005 Author Posted May 8, 2005 Thats some very interesting theories, mr Numbersman. Or perhaps the armour was just leftover from a previous female employee that quit? Too bad that this kind of comics didn't die out with Spawn. What did Lady D ever do to you? DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 True, true.. just a question of a hammering and sawing. I mean, all she really does is subtract from a whole in order to achieve a state of blessed minimalism. Im sad to say that I have yet to read an issue where she engages in either coitus, fellatio or any other such pastime. I did skim through one that mentioned possible intimacy that had occured in the previous isssue. This must be thouroughly researched, I will return shortly with a report of my findings. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Child of Flame Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 I've seen plenty of...ah...'fanart' with her in all of the above acts.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 I've seen plenty of...ah...'fanart' with her in all of the above acts. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Really?! Where? (for the sake of research) DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Darth Flatus Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 kaftan seems like a talented photoshopper i'm sure he could conjure up his own works of art
Child of Flame Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 I've seen plenty of...ah...'fanart' with her in all of the above acts. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Really?! Where? (for the sake of research) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The only FanArt I've seen contains a dressed Lady D So where did you see 'em?...you know so Kaftan can do his research <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Pervs, Google 'Julius Zimmerman'...first hit.
Darth Flatus Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 In the first pic of his gallery (which i like to call "Superman 500") all the ladies are in danger of having their heads blown off.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 Just out of curiosity? How did you find this, Eru? Ive made hundreds of googlings on lady d through the ages and Ive never seen anything like this before. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
metadigital Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 So any sugestion for the actress :D ? [snip: http://www.xn--holmstrm-t4a.net/pics/medladyd.jpg ] Medieval Lady Death would be easier to cast, you could just take any garden variety actress, bleach her hair and give her contacts. Normal acting ability would suffice. [snip: http://www.madcomics.de/ladydeath/LDV07.jpg ] Now the classic Lady D is much harder, not only do you need to find a 6'4 amazon with boobs the size of mount everest to prance around dressed in the amount of cloth itd take to sew a single glove, but you actually need someone who can be convincing at the same time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, I'm sure the target demographic are very discerning of actresses' acting skills. I fail to see the point of X-rated comics. This is just incredibly silly. Kaftan Barlast, "You're a very silly man and I'm not going to inteview you." OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 Its not X-rated... DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Child of Flame Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 Just out of curiosity? How did you find this, Eru? Ive made hundreds of googlings on lady d through the ages and Ive never seen anything like this before. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Reading a blog I've since STOPPED reading. NEVER AGAIN! Some of the pinups were kinda sorta neat though.
Child of Flame Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 What was wrong with that blog ? Hmm the Lady Death pics are kinda nice...all of them are :D And now I prepose a new Lady Death movie...Medieval Lady Death if possible " <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The blog linked me to the gallery. The gallery shattered my childhood. :'(
Darth Flatus Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 I just realised something, Baley you are not of legal age to view the gallery so everytime you click onit you are lying.
213374U Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 Um, yes, there should be, as there is. - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 There should be no limit to porn art. " btw, precisely how old are you, Baley? DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
213374U Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 It's not like let's say a 13 -17 year old could get scared for life...at least I wasn't "Ah, that's what you think, my boy, that's what you think" - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Recommended Posts