BattleCookiee

That ain't a country, now is it?

Why should we. The only people still caring for the US (Europe) has diplomatic agreements and are dependant of each other, therefore won't get into battle again. The rest of the world hates the US anyway and there-fore has huge armies to protect themselves from that US...

Meh, you can (and they do it (with pleasure)) Just make sure the press don't get word of it (or worse; pictures/video) "

You know, it is kinda scary to see that only Americans defend the need of large armies (not just enough for defending, but invasion-sized ones) and the bad current state of Iraq...

If it wasn't for their big army and the International consequences (not to mention nearby Russia) they would have probably done that, yes...

How about the current leaders are war-fanatical and love to attack any country that so much as stares at the big US?

Not trying to present "the model of World Peace", just some facts why it is better to stay FAR away from the US-Army

Indeed, it is impossible to stop that. But if every soldier just stops acting like a "slave" and develops a free mind and will, things will begin to improve alot... And that is exactly why there never shall be peace on this planet...

But if there is just this leader, without 1.000.000+ people who love guns, tanks and other "war stuff" he can't do alot to another country, can he? Now give the guy Armed slaves and wham... you can invade whoever you wan't by snapping your fingers

Certainly not by showing them that armed invasions with use of a lot of power and weaponry are profitable...

Including our big boss US. As a matter of fact, the US said: "Screw Europe" untill they were attacked by Japan... They made profit of the war... were unhappy to end such a profitable business, but the Japanese forced them...

And still he can continue fighting unauthorized non-UN wars..., it doensn't matter that you don't have support as long as the army still follows... American's economy not war-based? Why attack a country for oil-profits then? And note that it was only war-based because of 1920/1930's economical crisis, and because of the promises of jobs and money he was supported (like Bush, but just not the population, but "Fuel Bosses") Which I didn't have to use, if the Germans had no military forces...

Yeah... Invading Austria, Poland, Tsjechie, Holland, Belgian, France and England were "keeping the country secure" Hello, no they weren't!!! Military forces can be used for peace-keeping yes, but note that the war they should restore was caused by militaries in the first place... WO II was caused because soldiers followed the orders of Hitler without questions, like American Soldiers now follow orders of Bush without questions...

Please tell me you are not providing Al-Jazeera links as actually reliable and unbiased sources? Because if you are, it would seriously undermine your already lacking credibility. You wanted opinions of Arabic and Iraqi people on the occupation of Iraq...here it is!

And those Nazi's could do all that fighting BECAUSE they had a moronic orders-following army from crazy leaders. Don't tell me gassing 1000's of Jews is "protecting your country"

America's amazing anti-crime ways in Iraq Americans on Citizen killing spree in Iraq war Medical Care crumbled after US-invasion Chaos in Bagdad Even more on reduced medical capabilities Now tell me the Arabic/Iraqi people are happy with the US-Forces...

And those sanctions were given about 2/3 months after Saddam was gone, and the US seized control of Irak...

For people still thinking it is better after saddam was removed by the US, take a look at this Or New Threats for the Iraqi

Oh, and have they made attempts and such to make French look like a "terrorist supporting country threatning the US and we have to take down"? No. If you don't get it why I list Iran and North-Korea don't respond like this... So, nukes threatning the US? Having nukes is evil? Then why can Israel, Pakistan and India still not be as high as NK on the "Terror list"? He did not cheat in his first election? How can you not see that he obviously did? I know why, but I just noted NK and Iran because they are high on the US' "List of Terror", which America is gladly following...

I don't say they are not happy that he is gone. Just saying that under US-Reign it is even worse with crime-rates and the such, so they should also bug off... No, it is based on interviews made with the population of Irak. And no, not the interviews on CNN ofcourse... And also a majority thinks of not... stop looking everything through US-Colored glasses Yes, but as I mention in my post above, Taliban and Al-Quada came to power in Afghanistan due to the US in the first place... Yeah. Not talking about the US being there. Talking about the American planning to invade North-Korea for the War on Terror... They don't occupy the country there... just being stationed

No, but guess who actually trained, and armed those "nice" Taliban and Al-Qaeda members. That's right; The US. You guys gave them the arms to hurt you to bug Russia, and that was no problem; but now that they bugged you, all hell breaks loose. And yes, the leaders agreed that because of the awfull attack on Sept. 11, which, as already proved before, could have been prevented if your agencies didn't neglected important information given long before 2001... Yes, the Afghani may be happy with that, but the killing of innocents, bloodsheds by US-soldiers on weddings, and bombings of homes by the US are probably not making them happier... No, you haven't invaded Iran yet And North-Korea was also almost a target for the US, probably still is. Those damn invisible non-existing nukes bother and allow invasions, no? Democratic election. Yes, like the US had... eh, where the loser won by cheating? And as said before, would they wan't democratic elections, if that causes more fighting, bloodshed and trouble nation-wide? And progress... obviously crime reduces when you just arrest every random person, torture them for several months, then release them because there is a Thanksgiving or Christmas... Do they? There haven't been a lot of proove of that, was there? It was one of the first claims of President Bush, but quickly retracted because it just wasn't true. And yes, Al-Qaeda does do that, I was just talking about the small "freedom fighter", they proved that 4 years ago. But that is because they are a world-wide organisation, eh? And I agree that you should only fight were it is needed, as when you do more automatically more fighting opportunities rise, because of protesting wars/riots/terror attacks

Could be me, but I am not under the impression that Iran, North-Korea, Irak or Afghanistan (sorry if I missed some other countries) attacked your country, or are part of your country... Ofcourse they all share the same level of intelligent in their leaders, but there ends the comparisson. Protects the freedom and right. If you were talking about the NATO or "Blue Helmets" of the UN I would agree. But the American Army you hold precious is currently INVADING/VIOLATING freedom and rights... The sacrifices done in Irak and maybe in the future Iran or North-Korea don't help anybody. Loads of newsstories tell that the Irakian population thinks "that it was safer and more secure, with more rights for the people under Saddam", not quite what was promised... And while we are at it, the military operations even make it more insecure world-wide. Many people get pissed and annoyed due to unauthorized attacks by the US on Moslim-countries and due to your countries actions in Irak and Afghanistan Jihad-recruiters in Europe get a lot of kids that would love killing themselves in the US, taking so many of "the ones you protect" with them... Fighting the ones that can do harm in your country? Since when does a liberty fighter in Irak is a threat in the US? Do you really think these people would fly all the way to America to kill people in order to gain something in their own country? EDIT: You didn't cause the Irak/Afghanistan war. Forgot the world country there

1GB and not worth getting IMHO

Ehm, can't see that connection really. And you might get more usefull answers about scripts in Developers Corner, so *Moved to Developers Corner*

Does this has anything to do with Kotor2?