Musopticon?

I swear I'm going to regret writing all this in the morning. No, make that a wov.

I can't say I've seen it. The name rings a long-forgotten ornamental silver bell however. What about it?

I'm like a pineapple when I ramble; all spikes and hard shell, but soft and mushy inside. And lips get hurt when I'm being eaten. How's that for a member?!

I bet you prefer pineapples to pears? Am I right?

*looks at the avatars of the last three posters* That good huh?

Why can't I find another vice than this forum? The later it gets( in this case maybe 'earlier' would be more apt, considering it's almost 3:00 here), the more I ramble.

Once again(time and time again, to be exact), I have to agree with you. Not that 'having' is a bad thing in this case. I'm more than welcome for the need to agree with an intelligent and, if I may say so, cognisant person. Why did I use the word 'have' then? In this context it might seem to jold a fairly negative undertone, like e.g if I'd be "compelled by and outer force" to agree. I have(oh, plays on words) no choice but to blame this all on my rather thin vocabulary and my failing memory when it comes to usable alternatives in writing english. Woe is me.

I prefer to not read FAQs or refer to Wikipedia when I find new interestingly named forms of web-smut. It keeps me pleasantly surprised. Though I wonder why I nowadays feel...odd when I look at eggnog.

In word; "Be cheered"?

Or maybe Fall-from-Grace .Overall, I liked the influence system, but it bugged me that some characters are very easy to influence (Disciple, Visas) and some have hardly any influence options (Mandalore). Methods of gaining influence should be more evenly distributed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ::Sikon gains +4 virtual TOMBS-points:: Too bad you're a simulation construct. That zinging was worthy of a living entity.

^Those were classical infinity routine puzzles. When it comes to puzzles in modern rpgs(as in past-BG 1), Arx Fatalis is still unbeaten in quality.

All in pro patrii, I'd venture to guess.

A lot of 's today, eh? 'Cheers' just stucks. It's an anglo-expression, but when it comes to forum-lingo, us europeans share a lot.

^Precisely.

Agreed :cool: The lyrics are very "cool" too. Especially Herzelied's. Kheft-Neter - Sutekh Sa-Gaz ^Pure awesomeness when it comes to death metal.

Pardom me for showing my views out in public like this(I'm sure the less mature readers are already ashamed, but I digress), but my spite is summoned from the abhoration I face eveyrtime someone replys to a topic with a non-sequitur or a one-liner. I mean, the point of a forum is that everyone can add something. If you start to share your views with more elaboration and perhaps post more on-topic(yes, pot and kettle, but who cares)...who knows, I might yet even respect you as a member. I know of at least one who shares my views, but alas, it is not my job to spill the beans.

He's catholic, not anglican, you dim one.

No matter how much I try to hate you Gabs, my intentions face a dead end of laugh and hystery. But I will prevail sooner or later!

Hmm...I believe this is what Wookiecookie ment, when he said that we "scare people away". Not that I'm not proud.

at both

Remember that Greeks used phalanxes and tactical maneuvers, if you broke the line you in fright or act of vengeance and fury for your grief, you might doom the whole troop. Especially, as most relationships were between an officer(captain and the like) and a lower officer(their counterpart of sergeant-at-arms), if it was you leading the cohort. Rash actions took their toll. T'is bordering on the quasi-history, however.

Ooh, feisty one. You do realise that you could have just made a new K3 Suggestions thread? It would have made this far more official and now you wouldn't look like a dork with "My own what went wrong with K2-thread". You deserve that lock-down, you know, so don't bat the ravens for doing their work. Your thread is crow-food now.

Cheers, Kum. Well, the article borders on the interesting, especially as they've bothered to decent people to comment instead of the usual petermoores and -molyneuxes, but that executive editor just takes the cake. Who the heck cares what they think, when every other freakin' article on that sit already tells that? At least the "readers" they picked weren't complete blowholes. I wonder if they got anything, apart from the 5 minutes of questionable fame?

^A good guess that one. Go and play it.

A toy? Like what?