metadigital

Excellent, but you forgot option 5) Stop making polls about stupid things, Eddo. Long may you make stupid polls, ED'Oh!

That won't save you, Jimbob ...

eah, but I'm kinda not wanting to install it yet (it was on special) until I get an

As we all happily derail another thread ..!

And Ultima started off in first-person view (Akalabeth), too, so they all sorta derive from the same mould ...

Don't for get the ATi XL ones ... which are not as good as the XT but significantly more expensive than the GTs ...

... And there was much rejoicing.

I'm a moderator, I can't ignore ANYONE ... I have to ensure everyone is playing nice.

I'm interested to know how you would see this working in practice. If the mother wants an abortion and the father does not, what happens? How about if the father wants an abortion and the mother does not? Where does the casting vote fall? You suggest that the mother cannot have full say in what to do with the baby, yet at the moment that's exactly how UK law stands (I don't know if US law is different). A woman is under no obligation even to inform the foetus' father that she's having an abortion, let alone get his permission. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Can't use his genetic material without consent to start a pregnancy with a previously created and stored embryo, either ...

Oh, all of a sudden the ignore function doesn't work? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What?

In the society that he doesn't want to be a part of! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And your point? Why would I want to be around those who yell at me, force their religion in my face, and expect me to follow their two faced morality? I don't force anyone to do any thing. Checkpoint, you have the option to hit ignore so you won't have to read my bothersome posts. You can't do that when a person is less than a foot away yelling that you are going to hell. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My point is that you seem very keen to foist your own opinion on this society that you want no part of. That's called hypocrisy.

Actually, now that you mention it, I recall dismembering Simons.

I can see it now: Marvel villains take on DC heroes!

The exact percentage is irrelevant, though I thank you for this added piece of information. 3% of the population are not "normal" heights (both too short or too tall). Are these people not "normal"? Who is deciding what is "normal"? Why isn't 2-3% a norm? Is there an oppression by the majority? How many different ways can we categorise people? I'm sure if we carry on long enough, we'll come across some metric whereby you (or me and any/everyone) aren't "normal". It's a pointless distinction to make in this argument, and is logical fallacy appealing to probability. The whole "normal" argument is fallacious: argumentum ad consequentiam (e.g. the gay wolf-pack, vide supra[<{POST_SNAPBACK}>]), with argumentum ad populum overtones.

Tell me everything. /Lex Luthor

Now I feel like re-installing and trying to beat Deus Ex again. :D Anyone avoided killing: Navarre Gunther, or Walter Simons? Don't make me play it again ... :D

The Fallouts are all on DVD.

No. Not really. I think that's the one with the snow skidoo, isn't it? I uninstalled it without finishing it (even with the walk-thru). Though, I'm really enjoying the first one (on my second-hand PSone: swapped ten videos for the entire package!) :D

The expansion is available from stores now.

You forgot "turn-based" and the fact that they don't rely on player skills (like reflexes), merely on the characters skills.

You need to be careful, you are making a lot of swingeing generalisations from single incidents: a fallacy. The incidence of homosexuality has ALWAYS been (throughout human and other animals) approximately 10% of the population. Also, your three-arm example completely ignores evolution (one of your favourite concepts!). For example, look at your toes immediately adjacent to your big toes. If these toes are LONGER than the big toe, then you have a MUTATION. This is also a dominant genetic mutation, meaning that only one copy in the inherited pair needs to be a mutant for the person to express the gene (and carry it, obviously). Please note that I am not suggesting that homosexuality is an evolutionary mutation (you naughty pranksters!). This is just to assist you in your logical analysis of the genetic and/or environmental factors. (I won't touch on the barefaced silliness of your wolf-pack analogy.)

In the society that he doesn't want to be a part of!

So we can create an army of Hulks, with blood transfusions? What a stupid concept. Not to mention the overly-ethical Banner just happens to "infect" a FAMILY MEMBER, no less, with his own tragic affliction. ... Maybe there was some sexual tension, after all ... :D