injurai

Can't forget what you don't know about. This looks really neat, thanks for the tip.

Between Nioh, Sekiro, and Tsushima we are entering a renaissance of feudal Japan games. Only need Ninja Gaiden to come back now.

Maybe, just maybe. This would be a turning point for Valve, where the money is now back in making their own games opposed to reselling others'.

I thought I was born at the perfect time, but if we solve global warming and launch our United Federation then I will be forlorn that the world didn't end with rudimentary rubiks cube print machines.

That's the one. I knew he went by a mononym, I just couldn't recall it. Always loved his work.

That's an amazing piece of cover art. Reminds me of that one famous artist, whose name is escaping me.

FF14 has been going decently strong. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a new rise in MMOs one day. They'd probably need some sort of evolution to really draw people in though.

Clearly didn't want them to lose.

I do wonder how much mileage they'll get out of this premise though. Seems like you'd run out of material to deconstruct fast and it'd turn more into a sitcom about goths but they do occasional supernatural ****.

agree about summary, at other hand, noone is forcing you to click on them... disallow means ban right? You just want to control other people, how... normal of you Darn, you foiled my attempts to disproportionately punish Sonic.

We need a new rule, to at least summarize the salient bits of those stupid "news regurgitation" videos. Or better yet, disallow them in general. We should keep this as news, not speculation and personality pundits.

I agree with the_dog_days. Obs is finishing up their last independent game. The next in the pipeline is probably a new venture for Microsoft. Further exploring what they have in their IP portfolio would likely come after that, but for all we know that could be TOW2. It all depends on how many teams Obs gets to run going forward. We know they've had up to 4.5 teams at one point. I'm sure they'll keep a team around that makes use of their awesome ground work on the new-era infinity-like stuff.

It's all about candor and what the tone infers. "If we make the same number of sales on a platform that yields higher margins, we'll make more money. That's why this platform is your only choice. If our PC enthusiast fans that made us what we are today, don't even buy our game in protest of the platform, the say goodbye to use making a game for the PC market again!" vs. "We are a small studio that struggles loosing 30% of our hard earned compensation to highwayman baron, please consider joining us on a more fruitful platform to support us in our future endeavors."

I'm surprised America is such a beer nation when Jesus clearly demonstrated that water should be turned into wine.

Is that like Journey but under water & w/ VR? Looks charming nonetheless.

Based God

Iran getting ready to walk the dinosaur?

I'll have to check out this series, it looks like it would play well on a laptop.

Bollocks? Honestly I think both that sentiment and yours both rings true. You're basically saying the same thing. The line "Fascism is the opposite of conservatism because it refuses to acknowledge reality as a limitation of the scope of human will." Does raise some eye brows. Fascism being the opposite of conservatism is for all intents and purposes a meaningless proposition. Set theoretically or otherwise. I think the intent though is to say fascism is notably different from conservatism in some particular way. That way being the claim that reality limits the scope of human will, and it refuses to acknowledge reality as such. We know that reality often doesn't always limit the scope of human will. In the way that it does limit us, we can do nothing about it. Well, then what about falsely reporting reality to justify drawing the conclusions we want based on the distributed morals and reasoning that everyone already holds. Feed the system with false parameters in essence. Which is actually acknowledging reality and bending an internal aspect of it. What Zorapter is getting at is that everybody does this including conservatives. Ultimately the real difference is not between Nazi's or Conservatives, but one of consequential vs deontological ideological imperatives. Fascism tends to be very consequentialist, justifying it's means for an ends. That ends is a consolation of power, and relies on high population homogeneity through which it can easily distribute it's will. Conservatism tends to be very deontological, kantian essentially, relying on people to be self-maintaining and self-supporting. One can freely associate with conservative institutions, but ultimate the institution might still warp reality to serves its interests at the expense of another equally conservative institution that competes for resources. It's a bit ironic that this guy invokes Hannah Ardent then basically draws the conclusion he wants to be making all along. It only sounds like it's an indictment of fascism, but instead its a vindication of conservatism in a way in which conservatism is undeserving. At the same time liberals can't ignore false facts being dispersed, they still have to be engaged for those who wish to seek, use truth will have to have reliable ways to maintain truth.