Jump to content

Elerond

Members
  • Posts

    2622
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Elerond

  1. It is mostly speculative. In July Twitter's stock price was $33.82, in December it topped in $55.87, last week high was $54.38, just Friday before fall it was $51.48 and then it dropped to $45.67 and it is now $48.16. Twitters all time top is from 2013, when it reached $69.00 Big draws don't necessary bring Twitter's much of money because of how their ad model (and how ad models generally in internet work) works. For Twitter best users are those buy stuff based on ads shown and interact with tweets about companies, products and services. Big sunk of twitter users are just expenditure for Twitter as they don't interact with ad tweets and they are too passive in that Twitter would be monetize selling their browsing history.
  2. They can do it for profit, meaning business profit and still lose stock value because share holders don't believe their estimate or because of ideological reasons or for some other reasons. But stock lose value when people just sell stock regardless of sell value. As now twitter is losing stock value not because how well they are able to produce actual profit as business but because of outside reason, which usually means that stock value will bounce back. But any way companies don't really can effect their stock value because that is based on purely on estimated value that stock buyers feel how much company's worth is. Also because of these speculative value of stocks, shareholders stock value is only speculative especially if you they own big share of company as usually they can't sell their stock on market value as if you aim to get rid of large share you usually need to sell under market value if company's stock isn't in massive demand for some reason (like some bigger company is buying its stocks on fixed price etc.) So even though now speculative value of Twitter's share holder is down compared to what it was last week, this is good opportunity for those shareholders that remain and new investors to buy Twitter's stock when it is down make some profit in next month or two when stock most likely returns to its last week value, although Twitter's stock already gained back yesterday almost half that it lost and Twitter's stock is still in almost bubble high price (42% share price increase in last 6 months like most of other tech US stocks) so in long term investing it would not surprise me if there is big drop in stock prices when Corona relief bubble pops.
  3. They didn't actually lose 5 billion, share holders lose technically 5 billion because they wanted get rid of their stock even with under valued price. That does not effect on Twitter ability to work and it does not effect on how much profit it produces. So it is quite probable that Twitter's stock price will course correct in near future and make quite lot money those who bought those stocks that were now sold undervalued.
  4. 2014-2015 it was free speech to drive people from social media and force companies out of business because they expressed wrong view, but how things have changed now when those who then loudly supported such efforts are now targets of such
  5. Maybe when they see another human once per month
  6. I mean the situation is about 60% wearing and 40% not wearing. And it isn't compulsory outside of healthcare and some other jobs to people wear them. I would say that situation in Finland would probably be much worse if social distancing wasn't part of our normal cultural behavior
  7. You know that you are with you concerns nearly 15 years late. Cloud providers have had power to decide to kill business from beginning and they have done it constantly. And funnily situation is big part thanks to republicans (but they have not been alone with their 'pro' business stand) who have blocked all attempts to put restrictions for companies unilaterally end service contract that breaks their ToS, which they are able to change any point unilaterally
  8. Recommendation for using mask come in September. I would estimate that it was October when majority started to use them in public places. There has been people using them from start, but they were mainly those who could not avoid human contacts because of their job.
  9. In some countries that did early lockdowns and mask, things went well until they removed restrictions, like for example Restrictions help to prevent spread of the virus as long as people follow those restrictions. Which is why it is pretty impossible to say which would be best strategy to follow until the pandemic is over (given that it actually ends in some point) It really is not, but we have good PR teams and you only heard things that we have done right
  10. Yes. As long as there is almost unlimited contractual freedom then company can but almost any stipulation in their ToS they want and those stipulations must be followed if they don't break specific laws. And there is almost no laws when it comes to service contracts between two companies. Which means that it is usually for small companies take or leave situation. EU has tried to create directives that would put some rules that big companies need to follow, but almost all of those have been blocked by member countries. And US has even less restrictions and EU and as Parler is US company it would need win their case there. And good luck with that. You can just look how well it has went for musicians who have tried to get their abusive contracts nullified even in cases where other party is actually physically abused them.
  11. Apple and Google have let Parler not follow their moderation guidelines for couple years for some reason, usually they throw apps out much quicker, now recent events have forced Apple's and Google's hands in matter. When you do app that allows people post content Google at least demands you to write clear policy how you will prevent them breaking terms that you as developer need to agree when you publish your app. https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/10286120?hl=en And if Google's moderator (or their AI algorithm) determines that you have not followed their enforced policy enough they will remove your app and some cases all your apps from the app store. And Apple has pretty similar policy in their store. And there is quite little hope to win court case against them when they remove your app for any reason, as they have pretty solid terms of services that give them right to do pretty much what they want and they have money and will to fight decades in courts just to make other companies see that it is pointless to sue them.
  12. I would say that it would do good for InXile to create their own setting instead of using existing ones, as it would help them become more their own than ghost of Interplay
  13. 12 hours even with Twitter ban for over half of it
  14. I love how big sunk of reply's are "but but but MSM is evil"
  15. You know that conspiracy leaning people, sites, news etc. are already claiming that there was no Trump supporters, right wing people or Qano etc. people among those who stromed in Capitol, but that all the stormers were actually disguised members of antifa, regardless of fact that storming was live streamed by well known figures including right wing politicians and well known right wing/qano/etc. people are easily identifiable from videos and pictures taken from the Capitol. Meaning there is probably nothing that you can do to de-escalate situation with those people because for them only acceptable situation is where they have total control and they will invent narrative that justifies any action they take to get that point. So you can't take munition for fearmongering that isn't based reality and which changes constantly to fit current situation, meaning there is always new fearmongering stories that will be spread regardless of actions that are taken. There is no good way to counter such, but showing significant consequences, does not necessary slow down believers but it has impact people around believers which makes believers work harder.
  16. People who try to commit coups or otherwise cease power usually think they are doing right thing. Even people who commit genocides often think they are right side of history, which is why there is often plenty of evidence of their crimes as they don't think what they are doing is a crime, but betterment of their nation. Ignorance and intentions aren't valid defense for bad actions and I don't think that anybody should accept them as valid justifications
  17. Kevin Sorbo gives excellent summary what actually happened
  18. Maybe it is because you don't want to see it?
  19. Police seems to have different approach to these things in 2021 than they had in 2020 Looks like some people didn't read their master's tweets From "kneeling during national anthem being insult towards USA's flag and military" to Guesses will this fine impartial real news journalist from the Blaze get visit from FBI any time soon, considering that he tweets having access to information that is classified.
  20. https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/1346920198461419520 My **** post seems to be closer the truth than I thought
  21. Sorry but I need to correct you, I am just speaking alternate patriotic truth by stating that true patriotic Capitol troops support true and only leader of America, God Emperor Trump
  22. Last four years they have done their best that there are only Trump supporters working in all governmental organizations , so security probably is part of those who are storming in the Capitol
  23. Democrats winning both seats seems most likely out come. They have become quite good with their strategic vote dumps
  24. At least Trump knew it already year ago.
×
×
  • Create New...