Longknife

TRIPLE LOLOLOLOLOL WE GOIN ALL THE WAY TONIGHT https://archive.today/bvacS

Demonstrates their mentality perfectly. "You asked to interview me. You're pressuring me." Should have just skipped a beat and claim harassment and oppression. When I first saw Pakman's ghetto-ass low-budget show years ago in my recommended list, and laughed my butt off at how worthless his co-host is to productive discussion and how this is completely ignored and never acknowledged, I NEVER would've expected this guy would end up being my ****ing hero in a story about mass corruption in the journalism industry. Always respected his show because despite the low-budget aspects and his hilariously worthless co-host (who is entertaining btw, don't get rid of him), it's always done good reporting, but I NEVER would've expected we'd need to resort to him to actually get our story covered.

Gamergate raises money for a suicide help group and a Bullying prevention group. Anti-GG will raise money for rich white women. Glad to know who supports privilege. How dare you try to invite prominent anti-gg folks onto your show to find out why they don't want to engage. Hit piece! On the plus side, we have examples of then making asses of themselves. I feel soooooooo bad for Pakman though cause he must be at his little studio going "WTF JUST HAPPENED?!?" with a confused expression on his face.

DUBBLE LOLOLOLOL http://i.imgur.com/G2LLywe.png

https://archive.today/TsQoS lolololollolololol

I had a video pop up in my recommended videos just now. It's titled "cultural marxism: a CIS story" and involves an overweight woman who is completely topless arguing with a butch lesbian about privileges and stuff because - and don't quote me on this because much of the "discussion" is more of a screaming match with the two yelling and accusing each other of needing to stop marginalizing each other's opinions and other weird ****ing terms I'm unfamiliar with - but I think it's about how the lesbian was upset because there was some women's meeting to discuss issues effecting women or whatever and transgender women were protesting that they were not allowed at said meeting, and the argument involves the lesbian arguing with the topless lady (and a couple other flaming gay dudes) about whether this is discrimination or whether the transgender women simply do not belong with such a meeting. This is the best circus I've ever seen.

Maybe they just don't wanna go because it would involve combing their hair. I'll be here all week, folks.

Check this **** out: https://twitter.com/davidpakmanshow/status/528238603487682560 https://twitter.com/stephentotilo/status/528228545588654080 https://twitter.com/BenKuchera/status/528247803995488257 GEE I WONDER WHY THEY'RE NOT SAYING YES GUIS THIS IS PRETTY ODD I WONDER WUT IT CULD MEEN???

Well I haven't been back to SF in a long time, but the SF I left was a highly diverse little city and that's what made it so beautiful. It houses every kind of thought, every kind of person and every kind of political stance. SF has super high rates of both homosexual and disabled citizens, which is kinda cool because it means those two receive representation they simply won't realistically achieve anywhere else. But when you include everyone, you include EVERYONE. Unfortunately that means these people too... On a side note, I will be playing TF2 tomorrow in celebration of their "protest," and I will be playing it with a French Canadian girl I know with an outrageous french accent who happens to have DD boobs of justice. No, I'm not making this up, and that's what makes it so awesome.

We now go live to the TF2 community for their immediate reaction to this breaking news: Okay I'm following this drama only barely, so who's this guy and what's his role? I've looked up his twitter and the only thing I've been able to confirm is that he has some form of personality disorder or a mental illness or somesuch. An editor at Mother Jones. Essentially he is just some **** who likes to throw his poop at people. I get the sense these morons think by such Tweets they've joined some cool club, and they'll garner the adoration of females. Manginas, yes, that's the term I'm looking for. I hate to throw my hometown under the bus like this, but iirc Mother Jones is stationed in San Francisco. Can't deny that this train of thought does seem to be based in and around the Bay Area.

No games for one whole day! Such a task must take an incredible amount of willpower. Probably about as much as a 24 hour Twitter break.

. It could potentially show up on the web uncut. The daily show and Colbert report often do this, so we'll just have to wait and see. Americans should keep an eye on the website for a potentially uncut interview.

Yeah I wasn't speaking from any context from this being relevant in the sense we can even hope to prove or disprove it, but rather... All my life I've been referred tO as personable and intelligent, and while I'm still DAMNED young, (well, I consider 25 young when talking of experience) I'm learning my intuition is good. Incredibly good. A common thing I do is try to imagine myself in other people's shoes. I consider referring to other people as bad or evil to be lazy reasoning, as everyone has good intentions and rule of thumb is that the reasonings you would use are likely to be utilized by others as well. With this system, I often have an easy time understanding and sympathizing with others. Then there are times I cannot. And those few times I can't are absolutely fascinating to me. I'm curious by nature and wish to understand how things work, so when people exist and I don't understand their pattern of thinking, it fascinates me. This is one of those occasions in that I consider myself a very objective, analytical thinker, and this doesn't line up with the thought process of hers well. Likewise, I loathe lying. I simply cannot do it in many many situations. For what it's worth, my gut tells me to believe the guy claiming he was in the Colbert audience, and while I'm not trying to propose that as evidence nor do I want people believing it solely cause I said to (nonsense thinking), I'm saying my mind is set on this, which leads me to a situation where I cannot properly understand Anita based on this combined with her blocking the support with the harasser. It's such blatant self-promotion and dishonesty that I cannot believe it exists, and I end up questioning myself 20 times over what other explanations there could be, or if such people truly exist. And yeah, I'm curious enough that it annoys the **** out of me to know I'll never get a straight answer on this issue, I'll just be left wondering. Probably why I bring it up regardless of its irrelevance to GG; cause it's important enough TO ME that I wanna hear viewpoints on it. In short, I just have difficulty believing such people actually exist. I have no problem trying to picture what Zoe Quinn is like. She just seems childish, depression-ridden and maybe with elements of a pathological liar who seeks social acceptance and approval. I'm familiar with that type and view it as anxiety preventing one from taking personal responsibility. But Anita...? I don't get it. It just seems so shamelessly fixated on self-promotion and profit by any means, all while being untruthful for no good reason and with no good excuse at all.

From what I could tell it was the middle segment of the show rather than the interview portion, which IIRC(haven't regularly watched the show for a while) is shorter than the beginning segment or interview segment. Not sure if this is true or not(Trust but Verify), but it wouldn't surprise me very much. What I find interesting is (and if you haven't seen, check my second edit) this part: Let's, for argument's sake, assume this is true. Wouldn't this imply she's involved with the FBI investigation, which contradicts the fact that she's actively ignoring and blocking evidence that helps to catch and implicate the guy harassing her and all they need is for her to file a report herself? It's impossible to prove this as the OP clearly can't prove this was said; best he offered was a photo from the Colbert audience. Hypothetically though, if this turned out to be true, then omfg what a con. I'm sorry we'll never know cause I'm curious to know if people do exist that have the audacity to pull this kind of stuff or not.

Did you guys happen to catch the rumors (and let me clarify, pure rumors) that the Colbert interview was highly edited down? Some guy was claiming he saw it taped live and Anita seemed highly uncomfortable. Allegedly at one point Colbert asked "do you think video games cause and promote violence?" and Anita answered no, to which he followed up "then how can they cause misogyny?" Trying to find the post right now. I only name it cause I can TOTALLY see it happening, both because it sounds in character and because the interview....well didn't it seem a little short compared to the average Colbert interview? Haven't been able to watch it in a good while but I remember them being longer. EDIT: Derp, twas not hard to find, I was just blind: http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2kt77i/unverified_comment_colbert_interview_may_have/ EDIT2: OP's attempt at evidence: https://archive.today/ZSsxv

I am the pinnacle of a white knight. I tip my fedora at milady all day and all night.

Do we know the context of that photo or not?

No worries, I'm sure that screenshot is just Avellone shortly before choke slamming her through and office table for her terrible tone in her articles.

In what regard? The poster has transcripts and screenshots of everything, including the deleted tweets. The accused party is so stupid he saw the video and thought "hey great opportunity to promote my show." Honestly the guy seems mental, like he's a sociopath or something. The quote I gave implicates him. I'm also trying to ask the poster of the video to clarify if he/she knows that the guy is behind the Utah threat since the video makes it unclear. Not disagreeing with you, just not quite sure what you're referring to. I'm talking specifically about the Utah threat. Ganergate as a whole has been accused of stuff the majority of people weren't involved with sans proof, and I see no reason to lower ourselves to the level of those who would do such a thing.I think it's very clear this guy was up to some ****ed up ****, but I'd prefer to blame him for what we have proof of. Which as far as I can tell is a lot of stuff. Just curious then in how you don't see it as proof? The YouTube comment directly implicates him as the culprit, there's no other logical interpretation of it that I see. You saying you're not reading it that way or that you'd rather not have to rely on a random youtube comment by him as a form of proof?I'm saying I would like to see more than a YouTube comment as proof. I'll agree it does look strange to claim that the threat came from outside the US, I'm just not completely sure this guy was behind it. I'd personally like to be without reasonable doubt before I condemn someone, evern if that someone is obviously piece of ****.Kk was just curious what you meant and if I'd missed something with the comment. EDIT: like the above lulz. Didn't know that. And yeah this guy definitely seems unstable IMO. He seems narcissistic and odd. Never would've guessed that the threats WERENT from trolls just looking for lulz, but from some random idiot with delusions of grandeur down in Brazil. I mean GNAA confessed to being a part of the problem sure, but still I gotta admit I didn't think we'd see a legit creep involved with these threats. It's kinda scary to think about and puts things in perspective. I don't think anything would've come of this guy, but let's say this is all about the copycat mentality. Let's say he thought of doing this because someone else did it before him. After all, Anita's gotten and published threats since she hit the net. It kinda highlights how when they say don't publish your threats cause it encourages copycats, they're not just referring to copycat trolls goofing around, but copycat weirdos thinking....who knows what. Also highlights how surprisingly, GGs little efforts to stop the threats didn't just catch some guy saying "but it's fun," but caught a guy of legit mental instability. I have no proof of that mind you, but the man is currently promoting himself and his channel on the channel of the people who caught him, blissfully unaware of what exactly he's gotten himself into. Hell even his name and the way he refers to himself in the third person at times speaks of delusion. Guess it's always sort of like this though. Sometimes reality can be stranger than fiction, simply because at times a work of fiction will attempt logical ties that simply don't always exist in reality.

In what regard? The poster has transcripts and screenshots of everything, including the deleted tweets. The accused party is so stupid he saw the video and thought "hey great opportunity to promote my show." Honestly the guy seems mental, like he's a sociopath or something. The quote I gave implicates him. I'm also trying to ask the poster of the video to clarify if he/she knows that the guy is behind the Utah threat since the video makes it unclear. Not disagreeing with you, just not quite sure what you're referring to. I'm talking specifically about the Utah threat. Ganergate as a whole has been accused of stuff the majority of people weren't involved with sans proof, and I see no reason to lower ourselves to the level of those who would do such a thing. I think it's very clear this guy was up to some ****ed up ****, but I'd prefer to blame him for what we have proof of. Which as far as I can tell is a lot of stuff. Just curious then in how you don't see it as proof? The YouTube comment directly implicates him as the culprit, there's no other logical interpretation of it that I see. You saying you're not reading it that way or that you'd rather not have to rely on a random youtube comment by him as a form of proof?

They are just "venting", nothing to see here... What's sad is it totally sounds like something the average BR on your standard MMORPG would say to an opposing faction. :D

Also can we be crass little bastards and talk about how hilarious these threats with DAT GRAMMERZ is?

In what regard? The poster has transcripts and screenshots of everything, including the deleted tweets. The accused party is so stupid he saw the video and thought "hey great opportunity to promote my show." Honestly the guy seems mental, like he's a sociopath or something. The quote I gave implicates him. I'm also trying to ask the poster of the video to clarify if he/she knows that the guy is behind the Utah threat since the video makes it unclear. Not disagreeing with you, just not quite sure what you're referring to.

Oh here we ****ing go: The transcript no, his youtube comment on his video, yes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwHlu5Y37QE And I quote: That's the top comment on the video, written by him. He's implying the Utah threat was by someone out of country, something he could not know unless it was him.