Jump to content

The Sharmat

Members
  • Posts

    847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by The Sharmat

  1. On the Claymore maybe throw in a stagger mechanic? Like a raw block instead of a parry can temporarily stun the foe from the sheer weight and force of the strike?

     

    Another thing that's important to me: Bows require STRENGTH to use. The divide between light quick bowman and hulking swordsman is not only arbitrary, but unrealistic. An English longbow had a 110 pound drawstrength. Firing one over and over again is tremendously tiring, and English longbowman were notoriously tall and strong (their 'side arm' was a longsword). There's a reason a popular and effective line of exercise equipment works on the same principles as a bow. A smaller bow would of course require less stamina to reuse, but also have less range and penetration. Even a longbow with bodkin arrows needed to be fairly close up to penetrate plate. Really, light and dextrous fighting styles suit certain forms of melee combat far more than ranged.

     

    Come to think of it, you could further balance guns vs. bows by taking strength and stamina into account. Firing a gun isn't particularly tiring at all.

  2. It won't fit the budget.

    The poll criteria assume that it's a magical world wherein it does fit the budget no matter what. I voted accordingly.

     

    In the magic perfect world, yes, I'd love fully voiced NPCs with quality voice actors. Since we don't live in a perfect world, I'd rather that Eternity not have VOs for any but the important characters, and even then only to flavor the important scenes.

  3. I think it was implied that they're all relatively sapient, but I hope that's not true. I'd like some of the gods to be not. Just so that it can imply that there's this whole other ecosystem to the godly realm that interacts recklessly with the mortal one.

    I want more divisions than sapient/nonsapient. There's some funky ideas in neuroscience about multiple kinds of sapience, and questions of whether there is a sharp threshold or more a continuum of sapience. Some Gods could be Super-Sapient. Or, to take the disturbing concept from the fantastic sci-fi novella Blindsight, a God might be fully sapient, but not self aware. A tremendously intelligent being that no less lacks any capacity for self reflection. A God that does not know that it exists.

    • Like 1
  4. I would assume that's how a lot of lawful gods in D&D judge their worshipers.

    I was more discussing the abstract themes associated with that. In other words, the morality of objective morality. What if you disagree with the reasons for being damned? For example, many people would find the Old Testament book of Leviticus to have some morally reprehensible concepts. What if you found out that the powers of your world actually operated that way, and had defined reality such that bathing in a river while menstruating was a sin, and contributed to your damnation? Is a moral act moral because a God/Gods said so?

     

    There's also questions of 'gaming' the system. What if you know the morality as outlined by your Lawful Good deity, and simply follow the precepts for brownie points to get into heaven rather than any genuine belief in said precepts or inherent 'goodness'? How does the world respond to such a thing? There's some fun stuff that can be done in a fantasy universe along these lines.

    • Like 1
  5. I want to see Gods being unapproachable and inhuman. That's why they're Gods.

     

    I also want the full range of philosophies humans are capable of. That means maltheists, apatheists, and in the case of this setting, Flat Earth Atheists. Because just because something actually exists doesn't mean everyone is going to believe it.

     

    EDIT: Also fake Gods. Just because there's real Gods doesn't mean someone can't make some up.

  6. ...uhm...actually *everyone* voting in this poll here is (at least by OPs definition) already *pro* romance. The only question is *how much* in favor they are.

    Since you and only one or two other posters seem to have actually read the poll criteria, I don't think that's an accurate representation of the vote. Both the poll and the thread utterly failed at doing what I hoped to accomplish. Though naturally my poor wording has a large share of the responsibility as much as the other participants.

     

    EDIT: To remain on topic, and since not a lot of others answered. Interactive romance plots in games I felt were done well:

     

    Torment: Annah and Fall-From-Grace.

    Kotor 2: Handmaiden, Atton, Darth Sion.

    ME3: Garrus. Not the ME2 one though.

     

    Note that only one of those examples was from a Bioware game. The idea that the majority of those in favor are from BSN, even if it's true (and I don't know if it is or not. Personally I can't stand the place.), isn't a logical argument; and is the sort of lumping together of opposing views I'd hoped to avoid.

×
×
  • Create New...