kumquatq3

.......and you just made her point........

Serenity is one of the first HD-DVD movies, so has to be something to it. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't bet on it. But then again, I would have never bet Firefly would become a movie.

I did my apologies

is it hard riding such a high horse?

I know, who likes Tom Waits?

New screens too: http://www.rpgcodex.com/images/news/The_Wi...creenshot_2.jpg http://www.rpgcodex.com/images/news/The_Wi..._screenshot.jpg

Everclear - Santa Monia

::Thinks of Afganistan, Earthquake ravenged areas of Pakistan and Sudan:: I think their to busy trying to stay alive to kick cans and bitch, but yes.

Same here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ditto I do have crazy lucky on little things tho.

but you got your health and you always have the knowledge that you're better than the Canadians to fall back on!

Anyone read The Selfish Gene, by Dawkins?

prolly eitehr be a post-divorce thing or they were just addressing some kind of joke. Like they kept getting fan mail about it or something.

...maybe next year......

That works both ways.

It's a TPB now, so worth picking up for a couple of bucks

all about burden of proof. If I claim that I am the second coming of Jesus, it's not up to other people to disprove me, it's up to me to show I'm right. It's not up to me to prove that God doesn't exist, it's up to his fans to prove to me (and themselves I guess) that he does. Of course, the counter arguement is: You can't. You have to have faith. Then you have to argue common sense v. faith, and it gets ugly there.

The same holds true for condoms. I don't know either

got to have faith a faith a faith aha

You're kind of playing with words. You can prove that someone is wrong or that something is false. It has the same meaning as being able to disprove a claim, in fact, here is one online definition of disprove: "to prove to be false". but I am unsure if you meant all that in terms of you can't say it in wording or if you couldn't get the proof. So I'll leave it there. The burden of proof does not rest with the Atheist. It is not necessary, to an atheist, to disprove god anymore than I feel the need to disprove that there is a invisible dinosaur sitting in front of me. Religion is what is asking for your faith, not atheism, and for that reason and because the nature of the claims, the burden of proof relies with the believers. I know the silly way you can try to reverse this, lets not bother. So, assuming no one on earth believes in religion, then there isn't anything to prove or disprove anyways. It's irrelevant.

"Who's working on that new Revolution game?" "Top men" "Who?" "TOP MEN" Cut to giant sweat shop

I enjoyed batman in "Superman: Red Sun/Son", cool little take on Bats.

It just said "Divine Intervention" on the site, could be a new wrestler, like Thor or something. OR THE RETURN OF THE ULTIMATE WARRIOR!!!!

PNJ = not K3 PG = published by Sega Thats three teams with NWN2, to the best of our knowledge, thats all they have. I suppose it could be lined up for post-NWN2 or even in very light preproduction, but based on recent Feargus comments, not so sure.

Damn straight, why do you think Locke thought it was soooo important to train Walt, hmm? But MIcheal wouldn't let him train with Locke and look what happened. An American without his gun is like Superman next to kryptonite.

< This Guy!