Jump to content

kumquatq3

Members
  • Posts

    3256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kumquatq3

  1. If nothing else, the game manual should have great pictures
  2. With QB Chad Pennington and his backup out for the season, the Jets were forced to dig up a 41-year-old name from their past: Vinny's back
  3. It depends on whats eating me. If it's a shark, it would be over rather quick I assume. but if it's like ants picking me apart....I'm thinking burning.
  4. Poor marketing is only slightly better than no marketing, but this isn't good marketing
  5. I just noticed this quote on the same page the NWN2 pics were on: Feargus Urquhart: We are trying to be as smart as possible about what we replace, change and optimize with the time that we have to work on NWN2. BG2 actually took between about 18 months to make, while NWN2 is taking a little longer than that - but not by much.
  6. Sure you do, I think, the second (or bottom) image has a figure in a very Kotor esc 3rd person perspective on the screen. I can only assume it's the main "hero"
  7. I loved it for two......and sat through a third hoping I see the series had to move forward, but it never really recovered from the loss of SD-6
  8. Jets QB out for the season Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner will miss Arizona's upcoming game in Mexico City with a right groin strain.
  9. with denver winning I'm 9 for 14 for the week but besides the gods cursing the Bears, looks like I really was robbed on one pick: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=ArQo...ov=ap&type=lgns
  10. look, EA can go ahead and exist and grow. I'm just not a fan of how they choose to grow.
  11. problem is that he waits so long that no one cares anymore. Remember, I had a "Alias" avatar for like 3 years.
  12. Fixed <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ZING!
  13. I agree. We are talking about Microsofts IE case and EA
  14. ....your dead to me now
  15. I can find lots of people who disagree
  16. I vote eldar!!!
  17. I always wanted to pick this up, but bad controls drive me batty. Exactly why I can't finish Grim Fadango
  18. The laws are there. They, according to the judges, broke them Customers do want them. They don't want JUST them. Then they are insults, but insults can be facts Me? I think you are mixing me up with someone else The only joy I got from that was that the underdog responded to EAs "End Game" tough guy tactics, which came about due to Take Two putting out a rival product at cheaper prices. Both are HORRIBLE of the consumer and I would squash both if I could.
  19. I agree, their not a monopoly, but they still suck the creativity out of things and pump out subpar games. They also go about their buisness in a way that isn't a positive for the consumer (NFL rights). and the goverment "breaks up" a monopoly. Not rob them. Every example of this I can think of has been a positive in the long run for the consumer. MS having to make the IE browser less than mandatory may very well have kept the door open for things like Firefox
  20. does chess count?
  21. The Faders - No sleep tonight damn phone commercials with their catchy songs I can't get out of my head
  22. Because I'll figure out what the sufficent level of cowbell for a avatar is....and TRIPLE it!
  23. Axis & Allies and Risk 2010 mainly. Not above Stratego or Monopoly.
  24. Only the overt military operation is (sometimes!) frowned upon, and only if the government mismanages the spread of information so that the media gets a whiff. The US is very much in the business of conquering other nations through its economic dominance and puppet government policies. Don't believe me? Think about who's really in charge in the US. Why does the US pursue an aggressive foreign policy at all, and why does it push for democracy in certain countries but not others? What are the benefits of fighting a war in Iraq? Clearly it's not so that we can make the world a better place, but it's also not just for the sake of "oil" or of "getting revenge". Who put Saddam in charge, who expected him to become a lapdog of the US, and who miscalculated that and must now go back once again to depose the rebellious general? Others have more eloquently outlined the imperialism of the US, but it's not until we juxtapose it with that of a far more overt power player, in this case China, that we understand the differences of policies and why the US does what it does. Simply put, it's a matter of national image. China will need to work very hard to dispel its oppressive system image in the eyes of nations, but the US can simply be let off by the excuse of a dumb president catering to conservative values. When the next election rolls around and the US happens upon a "better" candidate, all will be forgotten and forgiven. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Meaning you frown apon it..................POINT PROVEN
×
×
  • Create New...