kumquatq3

Well, the controllers "in your face" usage is FPS, so I guess they don't have to be to bored EDIT: I still think Zelda got delayed to make it compatiable with the controller

So Clinton had their embassy bombed? Come on. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, it's their own fault. The US military went on and on in the first Gulf War about how accurate their targetting systems are, minimising the risk of civilian casualties and so on, that now every time they hit something 'by accident' it's assumed it was done on purpose. And would it really be that surprising if it were not an accident? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Kinda yea. What if the world knew that the US purposely bombed and killed Chinese citizens, and technically, Chinese soil? Thats a big risk to take, and Clinton wasn't that kind of risk taker. but was the embassing bombing a question of missing a target? Because then I get the bit about the US bragging about being accurate. THo, iirc, it was just bad intelligence or something of the like. Hence the bomb did hit where it was suppose to. To lazy to check right now.

O man you make this too easy, considering I already posted how it does: So Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals, according to your link, think that the Jewish state should control all of the "Jewish homeland". How do you think they feel about abandoning part of that homeland???? The Jewish State should CONTROL ALL of the West Bank, according to YOUR link, is what the Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals believe. And then you go on to argue that they don't want control of the parts they left, right after you were trying to prove how bad they wanted it: (w00t) (w00t) (w00t) What a flip flop!!! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ^ Here your trying to argue that the right didn't want tanks removed from the Palestinian towns in the West Bank (hence backing up your "literal interpertation" stance, in theory, of course), but one post later you say their ok with giving up land to the Palestinians in the West Bank. EDIT: and I should meantion that if they are ok with the idea of giving up jewish homeland, they are not literally applying the bible and hardline religious views, hence your still wrong.

I assure you it's not hooked up to analog (tho I think it would be HILARIOUS if I had it running on rabbit ear antennas) Not only have they, it's on todays DVD tech http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsme...film/T2DVD.aspx It's all about compression in this case, not storage space. EDIT: if you click to link that checks to see if you can play it, it tells you: Format: 1080P (letterbox 2.35) ^ cool eh? EDIT 2: more info http://www.wmvhd.com/ and the 360 supports WMV HD, hence it can play 780 and 1080 movies, in the right format

or minidisc or Atrac music format

1. Yep, yet Bush disagreed with them about the pullout. HENCE MY POINT! 2. Lobbiest voiced their opinions about what they want to see???? SHOCKER. 3. So, he doesn't ask again but he calls the withdrawl "historic and courageous actions". The point doesn't stick, if he is trying to please Falwell, he wouldn't repeatedly praise what you are suggesting Falwell pressured him not to. So again: Your link says: That article is about how "Zionist Israelis" and "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" are upset about the withdrawl from the West Bank because of their religious views. But this is something that Bush has praised! MANY times. http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/14/bush.sharon/ So if he is literally appling the bible, why would he want to pullout, something your link claims "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" don't want.

Ya, when I make a point and no answer comes I keep putting it in their face.

How about you post why you link supports your assertion that Bush litterally is applying the bible in foreign policy? No new links. No new arguements. Just use that link and explain to everyone how it backs you up "utterly". Your link says: That article is about how "Zionist Israelis" and "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" are upset about the withdrawl from the West Bank because of their religious views. But this is something that Bush has praised! MANY times. http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/14/bush.sharon/ So if he is literally appling the bible, why would he want to pullout, something your link claims "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" don't want. Do you read your own links? <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Your link says: That article is about how "Zionist Israelis" and "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" are upset about the withdrawl from the West Bank because of their religious views. But this is something that Bush has praised! MANY times. http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/14/bush.sharon/ So if he is literally appling the bible, why would he want to pullout, something your link claims "Fundamentalist Christian Evangelicals" don't want. Do you read your own links?

Whats the point? He failed to bring peace to war ravenged Bosnia. He's dead to me. You know, like emotionally dead.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051127/ennew...ia_051127221934

PS3 > 360 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> revolution > PS3 > 360 Search your feelings, you know it to be true

Yes and No I think that really depends on the console wars. If Microsoft and Nintendo gain ground on Sony, then more devs will focus on compression and pleasing those other crowds. If Sony holds there market share, then I think any effects on game size will be FAR overshadowed by things like, imo, Nintendo leaving the home console market....or joining up with MS for next gen.

Not really enough room on a DvD on the highest recording quality you get about 2 hours. HD-DVD yes, but then no consoles coming with a built in HD-DvD player. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My point is, if your a movie buff, it's REALLY early to say one of your big reasons for buying a PS3 is for movies. If it doesn't take off, then there wasn't really any great reason for including it in the PS3. I don't really see games taking up 27 GB of space anytime soon. + Blue-Ray is more expensive, at least, for the next few years at least. That will be reflected in both the price of the PS3 and it's games, I believe. It's the best format out there, imo, but it clearly has real drawbacks.

In a sexy good kinda way?

Damn! Then they have found out my secret identity, your all in extreme danger!

Have you ever seen HD TV? Thats what the excitement is about. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Like the pioneer elite in my living room? You can get "HD" off of dual layer DVDs and HD-DVD too EDIT: EDIT: just made it a new post

So Clinton had their embassy bombed? Come on. Is meta going somewhere?

Never got the excitement about Blue-Ray. Until the dust settles, it's just hype.

I mean, what can you really do about it besides reporting it. I'd think it wouldn't be easy to use some sort of voice recognition to censor such words

but it's revolutionary hot air from my bunghole

I dunno, it needed some steam if it possibly wanted to stop the revolution

You seem confident. It's a big internet and your all alone now

I'm surprised, after all the backlash I've heard from Euros about 'roids, that this was just brushed aside. Keeping in mind it's just one persons word.