kumquatq3

Yes, and I'd bet it comes with either a big game or the actual system or you can use GC controller

^ it's clear that RE5 won't be a Nintendo title, ironically, and that $199 is at least $50 too much (if Nintendo hopes to sell any)

You would think...

I think Juggernaut is the one throwning him tho I think we sentinels at the end, so they good and bad muties team up, thats my guess

I'm afraid that the shock value of "Just barely twice the power of the GameCube" might be too much for alot of people and they get turned off. Hopefully, if it is a $99 price, that will equal things out. But, assuming those things cancel each other out, I think it comes down to the games. Specifically early on. This won't be a "comeback" system. It has to hit the ground running. When the prices start to drop on the 360 a year or two from now, if Nin doesn't have a foot hold by then, they never will and this basically cripples cross party titles.

^um, I get teh reference, but I'm missing the point

Is it me, or would everyone but Canadians benifit if the US invades........

Ever heard of Project Paperclip? A CIA jet has already departed and Opereratives will be at your door shortly. Please, don't struggle.

No worries. Odin teaches forgiveness (CoF: right? Or am I supposed to strike him down?)

Forget that ****, we got... Wow, that thing really does take a long time to come into range

Odin

My apologies

Um...like? What I've read, you have (at most) a year before Iran has nukes. At that point, the "fluffy happy ending" doesn't even exist. At that point, things change. Did.....did he just try and win an arguement with Hope and Love? **** it, we're all screwed.

You guys are ruining my debate about blowing **** up with your god stuff

@ Blank: ^ kinda talk about "choosen people" in there too. It's a little confusing like that

WOT posts don't add to post counts, remember

Wars? No. Israel taking care of buisness? As I said, that might fly <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you read my ever-long post you'll understand how it just isn't possible for any future Israely strike to be fully independent from the US. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I read every word in it. and I'm saying it doesn't have to be fully independent. Whats the "good" solution here? In a perfect world, from our view, Iran agrees to give up the good for more food for it's people or something. NOT GONNA HAPPEN So now what? 1. Nuclear Middle East, with a risk of many dying 2. Non-Nuclear Middle East, with a risk of many dying EDIT: 3. Battleship diplomacy that, if fails, leads to #1 or #2 pick

So, if all the modern world thinks these guys are going for nukes, we should sit back because we don't know with perfect certainty?

Fanatical? Yes. Less capable? Yes. Wars? No. Israel taking care of buisness? As I said, that might fly

@kin:By your own facts you admit that, if Iran does obtain nukes, that there is essentially no stopping them from delivering them to their target if they wanted to (Israels successful missile defense system withstanding). Or worse, them giving the tech to other groups/countries. You will essentially have to create a nuclear stand off in the middle, as the US can't, and shouldn't, allow Israel to have to face a hostile middle east that have nukes without "mutual assured destruction". Diplomacy has completely failed at this point, and by all accounts, Iran isn't far from getting nukes. So you would prefer the slim chance of diplomacy without the threat of force pulling through before Iran gets the bomb over making sure tomorrow you don't wake up tomorrow in a world where the volatile Middle East is capable of practically ending life on much of this Earth?

Yes, I do. And so are encyclopedias and dictionaries too. Your point? Riiiiiiiiiight. Yea, I don't think I have to go any farther on this one. Just like I'm sure Sony has censored some stuff. Nin of NA was a different level. The only reason you really know of the censorship is comparing Japanese versions of the games to their NA counter parts.

The world isn't against Israel, for instance, the US. The majority of the UN is generally against most things Israel does. As for listening to the US, it's my feeling that Bush would be happy to see Israel bomb Iran, as long as they keep the US out of it. Thats because of politics. Not because of lack of ability. Even now, leaders of Hamas tend not to live very long. They have a tendence to blow up.

Good point

Um, you do know that Wikipedia is updated by random people. and I KNOW that the bit you targeted is at least partially off, for example, the Original Metal Gear (1987) had a random pack of cigerettes that Snake could smoke. So it wasn't this Nazi state where nothing got through. There is no arguement that Nintendo had cenorship on the NES, but video games were targeted to kids back then. They were viewed as kids toys. OF COURSE they made some content more kid freindly. That, of course, ended when the ESRB came out for the most part.