Rhomal

> sure there is... we already explained why too. IMO those reasons you gave are about as thin as rice paper. "Things change. Just because one says something one day does not mean a week later it still applies." > cheap answer... and not applicable. I disgaree. > we understand that when a developer says they wanna do A, B & C, that it is possible and even likely that A, B, or C might not make it in game. got no problem with that. but a developer tells us that a game sold well on one day, then reverses self a few days later... on a different part of a board, and we is gonna get suspicious as to reasons why there were a change. And on the end of the day it matter because...? Its not as if they are you best friend who, in your eyes, lied to you. Or your world will end. If the 'truth' as you see it on a game msg forum is so vastly important I would suggest, with no insult intended, you need to get out more. *shrugs* Its really not a big deal. > funny, but we thought we said something quite different. If you did my appologizes, I might have misread. > we not mind somebody disagreeing with us... not one bit. Gromnir disagrees with folks like Di and Vol others and it never get combative with those folks... folks who often disagree with us. Thats not surprising at all. You and they have a similar msg forum tone and style. Like minds tend not to disagree as much. > great. good for you... but take notice at the irony. you is responding to Gromnir right now, ain't you? Yes I did. Please show me where in the post I replied too is combative or a flame. I did not state I would put that person on ignore, I said I wouldnt read their combative post/ignore it. Never said anything about such posts that do not fit into that templet. I've been around the blocks a few too many times to be caught that easily

>funny but we would say that it is as much the developer tendency towards mendacity and their unnecessarily taciturn natures that lead to such stuff. some developer tell us one thing on Tuesday, and we see

While not official, if your looking for info theres are 2 stickied FAQ in the general forum. also my NWN2 News site has daily updates with compiled dev postings, interviews and the like. Hope this helps until a more perm solution is made. Also keep in mind the project is VERY early. There wouldnt be a lot of content for the devs to put up even if they had a 'full' site. If I recall bios site didnt go live until close to release. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't thing you recall right ... quite sure it was quite a bit before the game got released, although not much content. Depends on what you call close though, they were busy for years, site wasn't online that early but ... the earlier ya start, the easier later on perhaps ... or not. Darn, can't wait ... why is it still 2004 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Going by memory so certainly I may be wrong. The 'site' on interplay consisted of nothing more then msg forums, its then they went 'solo' and ended with atari did they host their own site (current one) and that was a few months before release I beleive. Either way, IMO, until more info gets posted, released I dont really see a need for a full blown site just yet.

Or perhaps, and this is probably just me talking all crazy, you be more mature then have a 'intent were maybe to agitate'. Sadly its attitudes like this that end up spoiling the forums in the long run. My 2 coppers p.s.: Ditto the compliment

While not official, if your looking for info theres are 2 stickied FAQ in the general forum. also my NWN2 News site has daily updates with compiled dev postings, interviews and the like. Hope this helps until a more perm solution is made. Also keep in mind the project is VERY early. There wouldnt be a lot of content for the devs to put up even if they had a 'full' site. If I recall bios site didnt go live until close to release.

I just wanted to add my two cents onto this comment, which itself is a load of FUD. for one thing any OS X mac straight out of the box is more secure than a w2k or xp machine (again comparing like with like, the PC is straight out of the box) simply because all but the needed ports on the mac are closed whereas all the ports on the windows box are open. Straight away the attack surface of the PC is greater than the mac. Then lets add in the many more security updates that windows needs compared to macs and finally add in the fact that 99% (or thereabouts) of all virii, malware and spyware are written for the PC platform whereas the mac has approx 40 virii in TOTAL and you can see that the mac is head and shoulders more secure than the PC. I won't even begin to say what I think about the stability issues, but a sys based on BSD compared to winblows - puhleeze!!!!! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> While I dont want to turn this either into a OS war this needs to be addressed. First what fairly skilled PC user (of ANY os) uses said os right from the box without tweaking/patching/locking it down in some way, shape or form? Last time I ran redhat I did a update check and had a few dozen megs of patches it suggested. So yes, ANY os, not just win32, out of the box has flaws and exploits, its up to the end user to be somewhat educated on their platform of choice and beable to secure it. Also if you follow secuirty bulletins you will find many exploits in ALL OSes, linux and the mac is not immune. Plus since the user base of win32 is so vastly larger, its no surprise there are more people gunning to find exploits. If the tables were turned the argument would be the exact opposite. Windows would seem more secure then linux. My 2 coppers

nm.. figured it out.

I added several people to my contact list, but where can I call this list up? I cant seem to access it easily unless I add more people too it. Any help appreciated.