Jump to content

taks

Members
  • Posts

    1960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by taks

  1. i think there's some confusion in the points that each of us made... it goes back about 4 posts, and i don't have the real patience, time, or inclination to get into it right now. suffice it to say, i think we're both trying to refer to something neither of us intended to say. i know, i was just pointing out that i had mentioned it... i.e. i was merely mentioning that i agreed with you. taks
  2. unfortunately, IMO, it has always been a joke. we are a world of individual nations, who should conduct business based on treaties, not some vague international law that only serves to benefit those that write it. international law is used more as a political tool than for any other real purpose. taks
  3. the US didn't actually lose a single battle in vietnam. we certainly lost a lot of people. we simply lost the propaganda war back home and had to pull out. that's not to say it was a good idea... just that calling vietnam a "loss" really isn't very accurate. taks
  4. yeah, but not because of france. i said that... taks
  5. touche! good catch! taks
  6. i don't know... maybe having a revolution every other year or so changes your collective outlook? taks
  7. i think the cold beat them down more than anything. lesson to us all: you can't fool mother nature! oh, and btw, nor can you kick her but in a fight! taks
  8. nobody said it was a bad thing... just pointed out that it is what it is. they are a news sight, but the hard-core codexers are EXTREMELY biased, and it shows in nearly every post they make. like i said, however, with the influx of bethesda lovers, it is changing a bit. i agree, however, that slapping a label on them saying "they believe this" or "they believe that" is unfair, as there is diversity, a little bit, in many of the codexer. vol and i do draw a lot of heat for our views on troika... he's the red-headed step-child over there. it's sort of like animal house... everyone has to have their bluto, well, the codex needs it's volourn. taks
  9. both actually... there are a few threads in the general discussion area that prove A. taks
  10. unfortunately, from the viewpoint of the humor offered by such an attitude, they are changing rapidly over there. more and more bethesda fans are signing up and the old, hostile, regulars are really getting pushed out. heck, there's even a thread asking where st. proverbius has been (he's actually a lesser-hostile, compared to folks like VD). that's funny. and i agree. i always figured you had some reason for posting over there, btw. their attitude certainly does not fit with the educated sort, unless you get the humor, irony and pure hypocrisy of everything they say. taks
  11. excuse me? hardly... you're not making sense, moose? taks
  12. they didn't face hitler, did they? they didn't even have to yell "I surrender" when he walked in. they just handed over the keys to the kingdom. dunno, but they lost, didn't they? taks
  13. no need to invade... we'd just walk right in! taks
  14. you have to admit, it would be... interesting! really, if you want social liberalism, i'd be all over it. you'd just have to put up with my hard core capitalist based everything else. taks
  15. uh, the deals were specifically for support, steve. saddam was bribing everyone to help his cause. i mean, how much more does it need to be? france isn't an opponent, they're just a bunch of cheese eatin' surrender monkeys. ;0 taks
  16. oh, the codex is a hoot. you have to get established before the moron comments go away, but other than that it's nothing more than a bunch of whining children... oh, kinda like that picture above. heck, i even got called a retard the other day. too bad the retard misread my post 'cause he could have really hammered me for being a retard about something else, and he would have been right, but instead, he had to accept the leftovers of my own self deprication! taks
  17. ya'll oughtta let me do it. imagine the fallout. taks
  18. this i don't doubt... well, stabilization was a stated goal, stretching it a bit further is not out of the question. i don't think anybody truly thought that, nor do i ever recall hearing any official state this. lots of mistakes along the way, but not so stupid as to think there's enough oil to pay for the war. that's simple math. yes and no. well, hard to say. nobody ever said it would be easy, just the extent of how hard it would be is an issue. oh well... uh... how DARE you! there is NO better thing to base your pride on. well, maybe a little... no, that's worse. yes, beer. national pride. taks
  19. uh, not sure where you were, but france had oil deals with saddam, behind the scenes, that they stood to lose. it was part of their agreement with saddam in return for support. i didn't comment on that, now, did i? the point that you seemed to miss, is france's hypocrisy. and, if you'd like to discuss getting our hands on the oil, i think you should note that the amount of money we spent going in would require oil to be almost given away in order for us to benefit. so much for your argument, eh? taks
  20. yeah... france... see, on topic. didn't know about the new beers. i did know about the triple bock, but did not realize it was the record holder, either. the swiss beer was not very good, btw. my buddy and i started an around the world thing (down in florida) one night and managed around 20 of the 80 required. we were cut off simply because of our count... damn bartender. swiss chocolate barfage was around 15 or so... we were pretty much out of it by then, however. taks
  21. france did its best to protect its own oil interests, nothing more. taks
  22. ? are you sure... i've had a swiss beer that was 17% alcohol. this must be a new beer... the swiss stuff tasted like chocolate, btw. taks
  23. gak! oh yeah, you're an FF nut... console gaming hoorah! hehe... i'm going to watch reviews. no more toee hose jobs for me. no console for me, either. at least, not till the squirt is old enough to play games with me. taks
  24. it's not that big... much smaller than morrowind. they said 16 square miles... of course, one moron reviewer thought that meant 16x16 instead of 4x4. also, they have other, point-to-point transportation modes, from what i understand. taks
  25. AHA! beat ya'll to the punch!... finally, a new game to play. http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/693/693106p1.html taks
×
×
  • Create New...