Does it matter how old the quote is? I don't know, it's in one of the developer videos. Is it so hard to simply accept Obsidian has said they're shooting for realism with this game?
It does matter how old the quote is if it happened before they mentioned they were pulling back on some of the realistic aspects of the game.
By the same account, is it so hard to simply accept that Obsidian's definition of realism doesn't mesh with yours?
They *could* have changed their minds, but as recently as the latest developer diary they haven't, making the date of the second quote irrelevant because it is consistent with the latest comments on the game. Therefore it doesn't matter when it was said, get it?
Well, like I said, when I heard Aaron's comments, I took it as realistic environments in that these are plausible environments that seem like they could really exist. In no way did I think that it means that Taipei is going to be anything more than an "Asian" city because, unfortunately, I am absolutely in no way capable of making this type of assessment. Personally I think it's confirmation bias (interpreting the comment the way you want to interpret it), but who knows?
Regardless, this is all arguing in circles. I doubt they're going to recreate art assets with the release date coming up so quickly. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if their in a content lockdown now.
If, based on the small snippet you saw of Taipei in the video, you don't think the game's attention to detail for the locations is sufficient enough for you, then I'd suggest taking a pass on the game. If there are other aspects of the game that you think will offset this, then give the game a shot.