Xard

Or maybe God really contacted him (w00t)

A)He goes against canon (as he lives without force and EATS the force. Annoying as hell ) B) He is very poor character C) He talks like flushing toilet D) He is all too easy to win after all "ZOMG, NIHILUS OWNS US ALL!!!"-hype

They like fishies too

I wonder where the man comes though... From Norway? I mean, they like to fish, right?

I found this when I googled "typical swede"

And your constant defence and assumptions about Nihilus is indeed a sign of fanboysim as well. Anyways! it is nice talking to you cause you are not insulting at-least. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> How I can be Nih's fanboy when I hate him?

That is what you wan't to believe

Single person cannot perform Thought Bomb and there is a way to survive from it like Bane did. "Those Jedi were helped by Darth Malak indirectly, so they could trap Revan. This has been revealed in KOTOR by Malak himself." O RLY? Did I decline this? No, not a single time. And that oh so wonderful prooflist don't change the fact that Nihilus would just slurp Revan. Indeed. That is worst type of fanboyism.

That's what I'm doing, right?

I) Revan was the Sith Lord and he had an apprentice "Malak", when he was confronted by Bastilla and her companions. Thus he was a Jedi Master equivalent at that moment. II) Force Lightening was the second option, if Force Storm was not the suitable one. Now! don't tell me that Revan could not perform Storm Lightening. III) And you are forgetting one big thing and that is that those Jedi were actually indirectly helped by Darth Malak himself so that they could trap Revan on the perfect spot where he could fire at them. And Darth Malak admits and reveals this little secret when you confront him on Leviathan. Here is a hint: "I helped them" and this line was spoken by Darth Malak when you question him that how Jedi could possibly trap someone as powerful as Darth Revan. There was no chance that those Jedi were capable enough to defeat Darth Revan by themselves, so get over it. Revan's capabilities are not fully known yet, although a few ones were mentioned on the Novel "Darth Bane: Path of Destruction". So, all your suppositions about Nihilus are wrong. There is no proof that Nihilus could drain life from a very powerful Sith Lord or even a very powerful Jedi Master. And by your logic, Nihilus could even defeat Darth Sedious (Who is canonically the most powerful Sith Lord). And here is a different scenario for Revan vs Nihilus. Revan: You will be crushed. Nihilus: Try it. Revan: Activates a special Force Immunity technique that can stop any force related power. Nihilus: Tries Force Slurp. Revan: No effect. Nihilus: shocked. Revan: drews out light Saber and slices Nihilus. Like I said before that Nihilus is over-hyped. The most appropriate reason is that he is not even canonically indicated to be indicated as powerful as you try to portray him. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I) you don't know if the others were jedi masters (minus Bastila) II)Are you kiddin' me? With just normal Force Immunity you can deal with lightning, besides, you can even do "Yoda thing". Force Lightning is not that powerful, geez. <_< III) Umm... Even without Malak fight would've happened in Command Desk, so no "trapping helping" thankee sai. "I helped them" O RLY? Like I would not know it. I've never played K1 you know <_< Besides, the fight never happened, we don't know what would've happened without Malak's betrayal. I believe Revan would've kicked some jedi ass then, but there is no proof. It might've ended other way around too. Nihilus could slurp every single jedi or sith lord, minus Exile. Every single one. You call Vandar, Zhar and other bunch of JEDI MASTERS in Katarr not as powerful Jedi Masters? And same with Sion, you call Sion WEAK? I believe too that Revan knows such technique but there is no proof for that. I BELIEVE, I don't know. Revan: Activates a special Force Immunity technique that can stop any force related power. Such power does not exist. I believe such exists (and if Revan knows it, Sidious knows it too, so no, IMO Nih. could not "slurp" Sidious) but there is no proof. So it is my personal belief and I can't use that in any arguments. It is like saying "I can shoot lazerzz from my eyes because I believe so!!1!111" Believing doesn't make it true. "Revan's capabilities are not fully known yet, although a few ones were mentioned on the Novel "Darth Bane: Path of Destruction". So, all your suppositions about Nihilus are wrong." O RLY? They are propably are not fully known yet, but you can't argument in style "he may be able to do that and he may be able to blow planets up for fun and he may be..." Maybe Nihilus knows how to defeat this technique that doesn't even exist? "There is no proof that Nihilus could drain life from a very powerful Sith Lord or even a very powerful Jedi Master." He can slurp every single force user. Did you play this game or not? "Like I said before that Nihilus is over-hyped. The most appropriate reason is that he is not even canonically indicated to be indicated as powerful as you try to portray him." I hate Nihilus's character. I'd be happy if he was weak moron, but he isn't. So I don't try to portrait him more powerful than he is, but I can't decline facts like you do. Revan is overhyped

*yawn* Maybe I should stop this for tonight and come up tomorrow... If this is not turned into smamfest and locked that is. True. But you don't have to believer to be conservative close-minded moron.

LOL. What an idiot. Atheism: the new inquisition. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I wouldn't go that far, but it is far more intelligent to question and seek your own answers, which often leads to atheism, <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree with first part, with second I don't. It leads to atheism just as often as to some religion. Or being agnostic

Trying to stay awake and type sensible messages on religion stuff

The "Kind" of reason? :D What part of his arguement is not the normal kind of reason? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, if you are believer talking bs how religions are evil etc. its not normal reasoning to them

Still, it is warmongering against religions. "he's asking you to use reason..." That kind of reason he beliefs is right. "Hi. Umm... I used my reasoning and I still believe God exists." "Your reasoning suck. Try again." edit: Why that sounds like France few hundred years ago?

Okay... how does that differ from warmongering from christians/muslims/etc. part against atheism? Religion is not only wrong; it's evil!!!111!! Atheism is not only wrong; it's evil!!111!! "The number of nonreligious people in the U.S. is something nearer to 30 million than 20 million," he says. "That's more than all the Jews in the world put together. I think we're in the same position the gay movement was in a few decades ago. There was a need for people to come out. The more people who came out, the more people had the courage to come out. I think that's the case with atheists. They are more numerous than anybody realizes." Dawkins looks forward to the day when the first U.S. politician is honest about being an atheist. "Highly intelligent people are mostly atheists," he says. "Not a single member of either house of Congress admits to being an atheist. It just doesn't add up. Either they're stupid, or they're lying. And have they got a motive for lying? Of course they've got a motive! Everybody knows that an atheist can't get elected." USA... In Europe its not exactly brave deed to admit that you're atheist. Oh, I'm sure that there is more than one Atheist in our goverment.

You have lost however. As you plagiarized my post. I will be reporting you to the Dean immediately. Noes!!!! This is where we get: "Who created god?" Then: "No one, he created himself from nothing" or "he always was" "Can't something else, ie Bing Bang, do that then" "no" "um....ok....." and you lose me <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hey, I just quoted one of the old greek guys Besides, first mover = God Thus whatever first mover is that is God. First mover might've actually be God that created god that created god that made the Reality and... Still, where did it become? It always was Meh, when becoming very philosophical you ain't getting answer to anything, nor you can prove anything. Everything is up to belief. Other answer to question where did the God come: Something that could think thought about God, thus it was created. If there is no record of it, it has never existed Still, where did that thinking thing come... God created it! It is paradoxal, yes. But I thought time came with the Big Bang. Then before Big Bang that can happen, there's no paradox then. Thinker and God are polar opposites and together are "first mover" and are...

But how do you KNOW that God exists. You can't prove it so you believe he/she/it exists. Isn't that believing. Nah, If 3 people buy the same exact car and they all come with different maintenance instructions, are the cars now different? I see what your take on it is, I just disagree <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Argumenting is fun I see what your take on it is, I just disagree edit: from philosophical point of view God has to exist, he is the first mover.

@ Xard: I don't, stuffs still interesting though <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That was directed to Ha- I mean Sand, you were just quicker writer than me But yeah...

The argument is NOT about which God is right. The argument is about which texts are correct. The texts are why we know of God's "personality" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> As long as all religions imply that their texts are right ones and directly what God has said and other are false, it is same thing.

They're all Gods, but you don't have to believe in them to see differences between them. Their personalities surely aren't same. If they even have personality like is not case in Hinduism since all of its Gods are different maniphests of same abstract Godhood. edit: Christian God is forgiver and loving, Muslim God wants everyone to submit under his will, Judaism God just wants to keep his people straight Those are conception differences, but quite different (minus the part everyone says that if you don't believe in me you are going to burn in Hell ) Of course from Christian point of view Judaism God and Christian God are same, but this isn't the case with Allah, as Islam is newer religion.

Umm... no It's like saying NWN 1 and NWN 2 are same thing since they both are CRPG's and start with NWN

"A)- Revan was a "Prodigy" Jedi Master. This means that he was excellent in light Saber Combat. And this fact was also well recognized by the Jedi Council. B)- Revan was very strong in the force and he had great knowledge of Ancient Sith Powers as he was one of the strongest Sith Lords in Star Wars Saga. He was also capable to perform "Force Storm" as well. C)- Bastilla (despite being one of the best in the Jedi Order) actually feared Revan." Umm... that doesn't prove anything. First, Revan was not Jedi Master, secondly, Force Storm is no use in such fight, third, Jedi Order surely don't send half-ass retards to fight against Revan. So those jedis in Revan's vision surely were strong and skillful jedi. And Bastila had her BM. I believe that Revan would've won them, but I can't prove it. Is is just what I believe. Minus for Luke (which doesn't birth until some 4000 years <_< ) since he knows technique to cut himself of the force for the moment, Exile is only one capable to take Nihilus down in one-to-one combat. Unless Revan (and TS) know this same technique, I believe that too, but I can't prove it. Thus at the current time Exile is only one who can kill Nihilus. Without proof to my belief all that would've happened if Revan would've attacked against Nihilus: Revan: Yaaaargh! Nihilus: *uses force slurp* Revan: *dies* Nihilus: Good meal

Firefox, Opera

Nightwish - The Pharaoh Sails To Orion Song that begins with "Get away from me! Take heed to thyself and see my face no more! for in the day Thou see my face Thou shalt die!" - Exodus 10:28 just can't suck