Sikon

Wait, Brianna exists regardless of Exile's identity. There is even a possibility that they will pull an Ultima IV and establish that both she and Mical followed Exile. And Mical isn't "silly".

Mical.

Previously, they made both Revan and Jaden Korr male. If they were caring about equality, they would make Jaden female because Revan was male.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Jedi_E...irmed_as_female

Yes, very unique, indeed.

Zhar doesn't die in K1. Vrook mentions in K2 that Zhar died later on Katarr. But then, the point people constantly miss is that Exile's trial took place even BEFORE K1.

Moral? Some principles that the players should consider in life? I don't see what kind of a moral principle the phrase "Exile is hole in the force" can be. I'd understand if it was Kreia's "Never doubt what you have done. All your decisions have brought you to this point.", but this...

Neither TSLRP nor the M4-78 project will touch Exile's trial.

True. Rushed, yes. Badly written, no.

Now, what does THAT have to do with the topic?

Except they were called Revan and Malak way before they becames Darths.Plus, there is a precedent: Zannah, also known as Darth Zannah.

Maybe Vrook was a member of the Covenant and the "Jedi associate" needed him on Coruscant? (As to why Lucien isn't there, he may be dead by then.)

The Council is entitled to its opinion. Exile's followers thought otherwise.

Believe me, a lot of people, starting with Lucasfilm. And Wookieepedia, obviously.

Your point being? Anyway, how does the Katarr incident relate to Exile's trial? It occurred way later.

YES. ...Seriously, what did you expect?

But non-canonical.

Excuse me, but why don't you go to Wookieepedia, correct it and argue that they were wrong all along?You could argue that Revan and Malak were not their real names, but if that's the case, you could just as well argue that for almost all other characters who have only one name. How do we know that Atris, Kavar, Juhani, Palpatine, Dooku etc. were real names and not nicknames? We have no more reason to presume so beyond those for Revan and Malak.

Vrook was never permanently transferred from one council to another. He was on the Dantooine Council as early as 3,993 BBY (Shadows and Light) and 3,964 BBY (KOTOR comics). Exile's exile (the Coruscant flashback in K2) takes place in 3,960 BBY, after the Battle of Malachor V. K1 takes place in 3,956 BBY. I guess Vrook was "temporarily" summoned to Coruscant for Exile's trial or just happened to be there at the moment.

By the Council, and I believe otherwise, like Mical and Visas did.

"Already you presume much" © Kreia. Even in the subject.

I think he just used an opportunity. In the end, whether Anakin was on the Council or not didn't matter much.

Kreia did say that the Council cut Exile off from the Force, which was false...

An official name is just unlikely, not entirely implausible.

Atris NEVER said that Kreia was Kae, and she calls her Kreia on some occasions. "Not her name" can refer to Darth Traya.