Jump to content

Jorian Drake

Members
  • Posts

    2473
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jorian Drake

  1. not to mention the first thing Iran would do in a war would be to 'liberate Iraq from the occupation of USA' US trooops couldn't stand their ground there against the iranian masses, and many iraquis would also join their side so many lifes of lost people in iraq for nothing if this happens
  2. we'll see, noone DOW-ed anyone yet
  3. Dont be daft. Do you really think theres even a slight possibility of that happening? Yes, if the USA and 'allies' 'suggest' UK to DOW Iran, then yes. Nations had enough of USA making wars, but Uk making a war and then his ally (USA) joining would be a new version of the story.
  4. StillLife....cute
  5. hmm 'Command: Hug Self' :devil:
  6. Yes, this could be the needed Casus belli they searched for, this would of course also mean an immidiate joining the war of USA too,
  7. LOL!!! http://greatfirewallofchina.org/test/result.php?id=150843 He's still funny! See the right side of the site, the C&C3 vid, and click voice, then just listen for a while and don't click anything else
  8. http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/index.php? The site of the mostly strategy game developers is blocked, while a lot other game dev sites aren't, i guess they can be proud now
  9. lol disney is blocked!
  10. GDI is brute force, Nod is brainpower. Use your brain
  11. It's Kane, it's The Brotherhood, It's GDI, this overwrites dislike of EA
  12. Well, I recently got knowledge about this game, and with negative comments about it like : 'this game sucks bad. it looks like Fallout' it got my interest So, anyone knows it? Can someone make a more professional review of it maybe than 'it sucks' or 'it does not suck' ?
  13. Finally! I've been waiting to read something from someone on GW. So then you're saying it's a great game? It's an online single player game, where you need some aid from others against the most harder enemies
  14. Burn the witch!
  15. Thank you! It works, i started the game and no problems there Now i go to conquer something, bye
  16. nvidia gforce fx 5700 i know it supports pixel shader 2.0, maybe even 3.0, not sure about the other thing doh
  17. win xp pack 2 intel celeron cpu 2.80 ghz/2.81 Ghz/ 1.00 gb ram what else is needed? wasnt today to see for the req.-s
  18. exactly, clicking on the .exe gives me this message instead of starting the game
  19. maybe i am wrong, but how i see it i do meet the minimum, even a lot more in some aspects I am a bit frustrated now on what could be the problem
  20. 'Please verify system meets minimum specifications' I got this when i wanted to start supreme commander, what does it mean, and how do i 'Verify' that i do meet the min. requirements?
  21. Yep, and travelling to the Moon was also fantasy some while ago, just like flying or having a 'world wide web' Socalled sci-fi is fantasy what is much more likely to become true than elf mages, but it is still fantasy.
  22. I totally agree. Only good RPGs are those where you
  23. I said a GW-like game. GW is set up pretty decently in all honesty. The major problem with GWs is the experience new players get when they join. 50% of the GW players are cheap jerks, and they mostly just hang around the early zones showing off, acting tough and cool. The "real" players are busy actually doing instances or PvPing, and are part of elite groups that don't deal with the scrubs. I have some issues with GW, by my main point in my argument was that it shouldn't be a "large persistent word" but more a collection of missions in instances-like places. OK. then I also point out to that any game that becomes online becomes also terrible because of the 'human factor'. You can have a decent world and story with nice options for interacting and roleplaying, but the truth is that 99.9% of the people playing any online game don't roleplay, ever. If it's not singleplayer then you can be sure that the atmosphere and flavor of the game/story/world will be killed. This was one of the 3 major problems why i ended to play MMO-s. Even if they are interesting, you begin to hate it with time because the 'community'. Most of the currently ongoing MMO-s would be a good singleplayer game, but fail to get 'their spirit touching your mind' because the noobs running around you with stupid no-sense/no-brain names yelling something stupid. Online games can only become really good and interesting for real RPG-ers if the world, the GM-s, and the creators of it are forcing the roleplay (since the character creation to talking-acting ingame) on the players, even if that means banning if they don't follow the rules. And because this won't ever happen, online games can only be good for strategy and fps-s, but no-way for RPG-s.
×
×
  • Create New...