Darth Flatus

^^^^naughty, naughty!

Baley you would go for anything female, i bet even kreia would be a possibility for you

A jedi fights and kills when he has to, so as soon as those targets go red its time to kill, kill, kill. Although i would prefer more of a penalty for using offensive DS powers while being lightside. Lightning is just pure rage, the telekinetic powers could be more justified.

The thing with holding a hypothetical sith awaiting trial is what is to stop him from using his freaky mind powers to escape and kill his captors? If the sith is a former jedi then at least you could argue that he was once good - maybe he just lost his way and can be redeemed. I was using the example of palps who has only known the teachings of the sith and is sith through and through, someone so powerful is a walking weapon so he should be killed.

Will try out ms anti spyware tonight, i dont need trillian as i only have one type of free email account.

i'm a tax payer and i am happy for some of my income to be redistributed among public services including welfare. I'd rather one elected body be the administrator of those funds.

i think he is serious in House, but i can never think of him as totally serious.... George.

You can kill bastila if you dont successfully redeem her.

what would you recommend? i have ad aware and spybot, is the MS anti-spyware tool worth downloading? i dont like zonealarm - it messes with P2P, i have sygate instead. I also use quicktime and real alternative. Hell even the windows default defrag is crap - i use diskeeper instead. Does anyone know of a good disk error checking tool?

if its the lord of the sith - you kill him, geneva convention does not apply.

the catholic church? really? not that i keep up with what they do and don't accept. So if its true does it mean that catholics the world over suddenly accpted it too? "Aw wud ye luk at dat, as it toorns out de evalooshun ting was roite aafter all!"

you wouldn't remember, stop pretending to like star wars.

the endar spire was a quick level <um tutorial, peragus was a poorly designed chore.

the answer is right there in front of you

yaddle she was on the council in menace http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/yaddle/ i think she was 400+ years old

jedis take on force sensitives as babies so revan wouldnt have known his/her biological family. as for the fall to DS it could either be attributed to the DS power of the star maps/starforge, the harsh realities of war or more likely Malachor V although kreia posits that it wasn a complete fall to the dark side.

revan went alone - we are told this, he/she left everyone and everything behind. Maybe bastila never kept contact with the council and hse could have hidden away from the sith like the 3 jedi masters

I dont understand the fuss over fox hunting, a lot of time and effort (and therefore money) went into pointless legislation. I wish people would campaign that fervently to get better healthcare and transport. and for all those who want to hunt whales, havent you seen Star Trek IV??!?

eldar you have extremist views? by all means throw them out there!! *switches on flamethrower*

i am suprised some ppl are so self centred.

revan used revan before the darthness

^^^yup and also you mean if he hadnt been mutilated (not died) as for being a good guy - "once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny" until your midget son saves you of course. OBi wan shows why he is on the jedi council and as for duelling anakin he knows all of anakins moves and has an extremely strong connection to the force. My overall theory is that

no, palpatines looks can be explained by DS ravaging or more likely what happens in ep 3 Oh and he is older than you think.

he was/will be crippled and will have lost much of his connection with the force. IT stil leaves him as a more than competent force user but nowhere near what he was just before he got f'd up. but he appears to be physically stronger in teh suit

is the topic: you are stupid if you believe in god! (althought that may be a deliberately inflammatory interpretation of the topic )