Darth Flatus

Sy Snootles - yes that was a spectacularly crap and pointless sequence. Extremely cringeworthy. But still i voted for boba fett just because at the time of the OT ppl hyped him up even though he was the clumsiest bounty hunter in the universe.

And greivous was probably taken by surprise, since it seems he can anticipate when a jedi is about to use a force attack

Damn you! Damn you and your literary skills! and your FASTUS POST EDITERING SKILLS!!!

Male exile to handmaiden: So uh that's an interesting hair colour you got going on there. Does the carpet match the drapes?

Pfft she's only average looking. (erm if she is based on someoen real then take no offence wa sonly joking!!)

Mine is an original quote from the book: Animal Farm - The Cummunist Revolution by George Whorewell

Odin is stil Odin in English as well as Woden

To answer the title of this thread i would say no, because of reasons outlined by other posters. However it cannot be considered as capitalist just because the govt was corrupt and didnt redistribute wealth accordingly.

Schizoid tendency: irrational obsession with numbers

China is supposed to be communist but its recent rapid growth is down to emerging free markets. Even Cuba is beginning to have privately owned businesses. Dunno what is happening in N. Korea but they are communist too.

Copycat copycat!

Well if the Elites (by which i take you to mean the USSR govt) then it is not capitalism because it is not privately owned. The govt gets the money. WHereas in a capitalist economy th eowners and shareholders get the money which can be and most of the time are everyday people --------------------- EDIT: I have a feeling i am being punk'd

Ok, but the point is that capitalsim means free market economy where everything is privately owned i.e. anyone can set up a business. In the USSR everything was state owned - owned and run by the govt. Hence USSR was not capitalist

No, because that is not capitalism. Capitalism is free markets and free trade. Capitalism isnt about elite classes and poor classes although those situations may occur possibly due to crappy govt intervention. In any case in a capitalist democracy any person has the capacity to improve their lot in life.

I mean in history and in real life, where are they? My point is that would we buy that kind of character as being female?

Thats an interesting statement but you have to provide at least one example to support your theory - but preferably not in this thread because i can see it turning into a socialism v capitalism flaming thread, and i'd rather that didnt happen since i like reading the facts and fallacies put up here. Oh yeah: apparently cannabis can prevent heart disease but not when smoked with tobacco

How obi wan beats them is important. So if it is victory via combat skill then yes he would be very good. If it is luck then no.

Female Revan? Never seen a military tactician/supreme commander/ultimate warrior/ expert general that was female.

I really hope we get to see grievous dish out some 4 armed saber damage complete with helicopter moves

if you have enough stealth points i would advise running through the whole end level undetected - you wont miss much its pretty boring anyway.

I see ppl stating that *fact* a lot on these boards. What is the evidence for this theory?

Or assemble him as early as poss, get all his dialogue and stuff and then you have the rest of the game to go LS

Dual wield is better but only if one is higly trained in that art. A novice using a weapon in each hand would probably slice himself up.

All possible answers: No! Yes! a Male! Yes a Female! Pfft end of thread

Health nazis are so annoying, especially when they chat sh*t.