Jump to content

View619

Members
  • Posts

    569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by View619

  1. Ya, wow, -20 deflection, why dont they just delete the ability from the game? lol.

     

    make it Defender: +3 deflection +2 targets engaged +1 damage reduction

     

    wary defender: +3 deflection +6 other saves

     

    Still good, but not as overpowered as the one now.

     

    It's not actually -20 deflection. The 2.0 version is -5, but I'm assuming people are counting in the deflection gained from the pre-2.0 ability for some reason.

  2. So, if I didn't purchase the expansion through KS but want to purchase through another platform (GOG, Steam, etc) will I need to pay for both parts? Will it be the same total price paid by backers split across both parts? Or will I end up paying more than the backers did?

     

    I wouldn't be surprised if non-backers end up paying more, since I remember spending $20-$25 on POE originally while the final release was around $40-$45.

  3. Still waiting to see if a Developer will join in this convo to explain the thinking behind this awful change

     

    Maybe they think + 2 engagement limit is fine and they don't want it to add to deflection? Why would focusing your attention on multiple units not reduce your ability to more effectively defend yourself?

     

    Thematically, it makes sense. Honestly, my only issue is the fact that they won't allow players to negate it with Wary Defender (+5 to every defense except deflection). I don't see a good reason to pick up Wary Defender if that's all it adds.

  4. Well, I've seen ranged, disengaged enemies dodge out of the AOE of spells then go back to attacking. Not to mention switching to targets most likely to be knocked out (regardless of deflection), switching positions just to trigger Flanked, enemies engaging a passing unit just long enough to trigger a disengagement attack then switching back to the main target, etc.

     

    It's looking good so far.

    • Like 6
  5. Hey Aarik,

     

    I'll reproduce and send a screen-shot. The fight involves Maerwald, who doesn't have access to any charm or confusion spells, and 3 blights.

     

    Edit:

     

    Having some problems reproducing. The only additional details I can add are:

     

    1. Human Barbarian had less than 50% hp and had activated Fighting Spirit.
    2. Stalwart Defiance was active, possibly as an immediate action before the attempt to drink.
    3. Attempts to drink had been interrupted.
    4. In one case, Suppress Affliction was active to cancel Concealhaut's Corrosive Siphon.
  6. So, I have a PC Barbarian with a minor potion of rejuvenation (blue potion, heals over time). After attempting to interact with it, I lose all control over the unit and he just stands in place refusing to act. AI scripts are turned on, with both behaviours set to "Aggressive". This occurs during combat with Maerwald.

     

    Output Log - https://www.dropbox.com/s/uig304xfwuppays/output_log.txt?dl=0

    Save Game - https://www.dropbox.com/s/a7w14yb90kxyw35/10b596a2-a9b7-419b-83b5-41cf2871582a%20quicksave.savegame?dl=0

  7.  

    It's possible for Wizards in stealth to cast AOE spells like Chill Fog without being targeted by enemies, in a similar manner to off-screen Cloud Kill in BG. Is this an intended feature?

     

    We do not want the ability to consistently attack enemies while in stealth. This just seems to be one of the few instances that didn't get caught by our "what should leave you in stealth and what shouldn't" rules.

     

     

    Understood, it did seem odd that off-screen spell "abuse" would be allowed. I can try to list any other spells/effects that result in similar outcomes if I run across them.

  8.  

    Armor Enchanting seems to have been fixed (this bug http://forums.obsidian.net/topic/80900-damage-reduction-enchantment-bug/). As has the +5% endurance from sacrificing durance and devouring the souls from the machine which were bugged previously.

    • Improved quality of font text when the game is at a higher resolution than 1920x1200.

    I hadn't realised there was something off before but I was struck by how sharp it looks now (2560x1440).

     

    Yeah, but by contrast, text is disgustingly blurry at lower resolutions now.

     

     

    Yeah, I can second this. I actually thought that my eyesight was getting worse.

  9. Well think about the mechanics of multiplayer BG1/2  its not difficult to add, just a custom companions that can be controlled over the internet by friends to co-op in your story.

     

    I found a lot of selfish people saying that about the multiplayer aswell, basically saying don't add multi-player for all the people that wanted it simply because they didn't like it and had some kinda single player elitism.

     

    Its OPTIONAL, if you don't want to play it thats fine, but why be a nay-sayer to those that want to co-op with friends? its not taking away from your experience, I don't want an MMO just co-op story.

     

    I'm not sure why it's difficult for you to understand that adding multiplayer is not easy. You see this all the time in software development where end users think they understand the process and start asking for everything that enters their head because they don't understand the level of work involved to make it happen.

     

    Also, any time spent on implementing multi-player would have two potential drawbacks:

     

    1. Taking resources away from adding content/correcting issues to the main game. This means a weaker game overall, even with multiplayer added.
    2. Modifying the core game to facilitate multi-player without making it seem tacked on.

     

    Adding multi-player is not easy and will detract from the core game no matter how you want to view it. And at the end of the day, it's a very minor part of the overall game that wouldn't even bring in enough players to make it worthwhile. This has nothing to do with players being selfish or single player elitism, it's about efficiency and not wanting to see the core game, the majority's game-play experience, suffer. If you want a multiplayer-focused RPG then buy Divinity:Original Sin.

     

    Otherwise, I agree with this thread. Great job Obsidian, keep up the good work!

  10. You can just treat the stash like throwing things on the ground, then ignore it. Also, it would serve you well if you didn't correlate classes in D&D/BG2 to those in Pillars of Eternity; some have similarities but play differently. 

     

    Regarding each class having access to all gear, remember that there's a recovery trade-off for wearing heavier armour. So, putting spell casters or Rogues in their D&D armour equivalents can be a good way of balancing survivability with action speed.

×
×
  • Create New...