Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bercon

Do not make the game isometric

Recommended Posts

Are you referring to the backdrop or the character models? I'm less keen on how much is involved in developing a prerendered backdrop, but characters (especially customizable ones) are cheaper and more versatile in 3D. And this is not with copy/pasting.

 

I don't mind the characters being in 3D. That would make sense.

 

There's a reason why inXile went with a 3D engine to do the "true sequel" to an old school, very 2D game. There are huge benefits to development, as well as quality assurance.

 

Which I'm sure the Obsidian devs are aware of. I'm very excited about Wasteland 2 as well, and the screenshots look great. But I'd have no objections if they went with unique, hand painted backdrops for this project, instead of bland 3D maps created with a toolkit.

Edited by Audiocide

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how a modern 2D isometric game with 3D character can look like :

 

original.jpg

 

 

Or like this :

 

Bastion_122310_0001.jpg

Edited by Darkath
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the focus here is to make a great RPG.

 

Neither rotating cameras, nor facial animations would have made Planescape: Torment better.

 

Wrong.

 

God, you've had 30 posts and you're already annoying the **** out of me.


Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how a modern 2D isometric game with 3D character can look like :

 

(screenie)

 

Like a mock-up concept art that doesn't even feature 3d models? O_o'

 

EDIT: Ah, I see you've added a Bastion screenshot. I guess that kinda fits, though Bastion went with a 3d model turned into a sprite only because of manpower/time problems with making the sprites, and doesn't really use it to its full potential (the character's visual customization is very limited, and it probably would have fit the art style better if they went full 2d).

Edited by WorstUsernameEver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how a modern 2D isometric game with 3D character can look like :

 

(screenie)

 

Like a mock-up concept art that doesn't even feature 3d models? O_o'

 

Those are 3D models actually. (edit probably not the passers-by with their umbrellas, but the shining NPC are 3D, they showcased the dwarf model in a video for instance)

Edited by Darkath

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Amazon ad on Kindle DX

Lose Yourself in Your Reading

The most elegant feature of a physical book is that it disappears while you're reading. Immersed in the author's world and ideas, you don't notice a book's glue, the stitching, or ink. Our top design objective was to make Kindle disappear

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dwarf might be 3d but the rest is cropped concept art. This mock-up has the 3d models, and you can clearly see the polygons, etc. Still doesn't look bad, mind you, but you're misrepresenting how a 2.5d game would look by using that screenshot to prove a point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i took the wrong picture, i'll change it, but nevertheless, it looks really similar to me, true we see some more polygons and less crisp details, but that's really ok for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who would love to just play a 2d infinity engine style game here and wasnt the purpose of this whole kickstarter to go for this? or what?

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the focus here is to make a great RPG.

 

Neither rotating cameras, nor facial animations would have made Planescape: Torment better.

 

Wrong.

 

God, you've had 30 posts and you're already annoying the **** out of me.

 

Relax, kid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who would love to just play a 2d infinity engine style game here and wasnt the purpose of this whole kickstarter to go for this? or what?

 

Infinity Engine style can mean many things.. you can ideally do an Infinity Engine game in full 3d.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then there's no reason to argue, because I'm sure obsidian has got it covered. It looks like they've done their research for this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pre-rendered 2D art > 3D modelling :p

 

It's also probably cheaper. Which means more content!

 

Makes no sense. First, the pre-rendered 2D art was a 3D model first too. Therefore building a 3D model, then rendering it to 2D, then cutting it and implementing it into the map is more work than just using the basic 3D model from the go.

  • Like 1

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then there's no reason to argue, because I'm sure obsidian has got it covered. It looks like they've done their research for this game.

Indeed, Sawyer sounded like that.

Looks fine to me, camera doesn't need to go any closer in this kind of game (as much as I liked watching NWN2 battles at super-closeup).

I think the camera needs to make the tactical gameplay enjoyable and it needs to help convey the right atmosphere/vibe of the world. If the environments are built for the camera (as this one is), these distances/angles work well.

Edited by Wombat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no sense. First, the pre-rendered 2D art was a 3D model first too. Therefore building a 3D model, then rendering it to 2D, then cutting it and implementing it into the map is more work than just using the basic 3D model from the go.

 

It makes sense from a nostalgic point of view, which I feel like is not entirely without its merits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cripple yourself technic-wise just for nostalgia, you are doing it wrong, imo. They should use the superior technic, which costs them less and is faster to work with. In worst case, they can still add filters and shaders over the whole scene to give it a painted look. Such a thing is not impossible.

  • Like 1

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who would love to just play a 2d infinity engine style game here and wasnt the purpose of this whole kickstarter to go for this? or what?

 

I could be wrong, but I actually think that was the whole purpose.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cripple yourself technic-wise just for nostalgia, you are doing it wrong, imo. They should use the superior technic, which costs them less and is faster to work with. In worst case, they can still add filters and shaders over the whole scene to give it a painted look. Such a thing is not impossible.

 

Possible. I will wait with voicing my opinion about this till I see what obsidian is actually going to do. I'm not someone who has so little faith in them that I dont think they haven't thought through this subject extensively and more than people in this thread have, though this is an assumption.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cripple yourself technic-wise just for nostalgia, you are doing it wrong, imo. They should use the superior technic, which costs them less and is faster to work with. In worst case, they can still add filters and shaders over the whole scene to give it a painted look. Such a thing is not impossible.

 

The argument of not crippling yourself technically wise because of nostalgia is what gave us Fallout 3. Which I hated. Of course, that lead to New Vegas, which was actually great, but still, not the turn based top down Fallout we all wanted.

  • Like 1

Dragonblade of the Obsidian Order

 

No sleep for the Watcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no sense. First, the pre-rendered 2D art was a 3D model first too. Therefore building a 3D model, then rendering it to 2D, then cutting it and implementing it into the map is more work than just using the basic 3D model from the go.

 

Not exactly. They can easily go for higher polys models, paint them over to get a consistent look instead of using textures, possibly implement animated effects, etc. I still don't think pre-rendered has an edge over 2d, but it's not taht simple.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I expected at least tech demo at the opening of Kickstarter but they may be thinking a certain mystery may be good for spreading words, which is an understandable tactics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...