Jump to content

Vista?  

75 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you going to upgrade?

    • Yes
      12
    • No
      18
    • Yes, Halo3 requires Vista...
      1
    • Yes, X requires Vista
      1
    • Not untill I have to...
      43


Recommended Posts

Posted
Would it be inaccurate to suggest that Vista is less efficient than XP based on performance and the resources of the machines they run on?

 

This is a good question. If this is the case, then I will most definitely wait to purchase the OS.

Fionavar's Holliday Wishes to all members of our online community:  Happy Holidays

 

Join the revelry at the Obsidian Plays channel:
Obsidian Plays


 
Remembering tarna, Phosphor, Metadigital, and Visceris.  Drink mead heartily in the halls of Valhalla, my friends!

Posted

I think it sucks. My parents just bought a new computer and I was at their house helping them set it up. That security prompt comes up any time any type of change happens on the machine. Any time you install new software it prompts you to accept or deny. This computer came bundle in a package with a printer. Problem is the software for it is for Win98SE, 2000, ME and XP and not Vista. It would not install because Vista would not allow it so I had to go and use the default printer setting that came with Vista. There were some start up programs my mom wanted me to remove, she considered them annoying, but there is no Run feature to get you to MSCONFIG.

 

XP works just fine by me.

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength

Baldur's Gate modding
TeamBG
Baldur's Gate modder/community leader
Baldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta tester
Baldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester

Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester

Posted (edited)
Would it be inaccurate to suggest that Vista is less efficient than XP based on performance and the resources of the machines they run on?

I think it has more to do with that it just is plainly a much bigger OS.

Edited by Dark Moth
Posted

With the exception on a a couple of games the performance have increased compared to XP. It boots up faster, programs open and close faster, and the such. So far the only game that is giving me any headache in the slow down department since the RAM increase is NWN2 and that is probably because the game really needs to be better optimized.

Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer.

 

@\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?"

Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy."

Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"

Posted
Try adding a ReadyBoost™ certified USB 2.0 Memory drive (>256MB; 2GB is optimal); it's not a super enhancement (yet) but it is going to start being a good accelerator for Memory caching (instead of using the harddrive). :)

 

*confused*

 

Why not just get more RAM instead? Doesn't that eliminate the need for memory caching?

ReadyBoost is for hardisk-cashing.

 

Windows Vista - It still crashes, but now you enjoy it.

Try pulling out the cable modem without telling Vista: instant BSoD! :p

 

Even if you tell Vista via the "remove hardware" wizard (in the menu bar), there is still a 50% chance of BSoD. :p

 

It also seems to take twice as long to shutdown ... though this might be a lot of (secretly) pre-loaded detritus from Compaq.

OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS

ingsoc.gif

OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
I bet you didn't because you most likely had to upgrade your videocard :ermm:

You're just defending it because your rig can handle it.

Edited by Blank
Posted
I still got unopened Vista on my desk!

 

Open and install already!

 

ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US!

Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer.

 

@\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?"

Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy."

Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"

Posted

He should burn it.

"My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist
I am Dan Quayle of the Romans.
I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.
Heja Sverige!!
Everyone should cuffawkle more.
The wrench is your friend. :bat:

Posted

Awesome!

"My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist
I am Dan Quayle of the Romans.
I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.
Heja Sverige!!
Everyone should cuffawkle more.
The wrench is your friend. :bat:

Posted (edited)
I bet you didn't because you most likely had to upgrade your videocard =]

You're just defending it because your rig can handle it.

 

Your rig can't handle XP? :woot:

Don't rub it in!

 

But actually, I thought you were talking about Vista.

Edited by Blank
Posted

Someone I know has it and said that about half of his games didn't function properly...

"Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum."

-Hurlshot

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Microsoft promised much more efficient gaming and more performance with their new OS. They lied.

 

"In the end, it looks like the the new, bulky, poorly supported operating system is at the root of it all."

 

Source: http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA==

 

XP still beats Vista in every game except one rare case.

Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!

Posted

I didn't read the article. I expect the new Vista design will fruit as soon as a threshold is reached (probably a critical mass of DX10 games).

OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS

ingsoc.gif

OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT

Posted

Well, I went back to XP for my store baught PC. The lil' Sempron just couldn't handle Vista all that well. The new computer will be here within a month and it will have a much better processor than a Sempron 3400.

Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer.

 

@\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?"

Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy."

Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...