thepixiesrock Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Wait, this is one big joke, and Hades is pulling the strings. This has to be a joke. We're on candid forum or something aren't we? Because I really don't want to believe someone is this stupid. Lou Gutman, P.I.- It's like I'm not even trying anymore!http://theatomicdanger.iforumer.com/index....theatomicdangerOne billion b-balls dribbling simultaneously throughout the galaxy. One trillion b-balls being slam dunked through a hoop throughout the galaxy. I can feel every single b-ball that has ever existed at my fingertips. I can feel their collective knowledge channeling through my viens. Every jumpshot, every rebound and three-pointer, every layup, dunk, and free throw. I am there.
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 (edited) Talking about teenagers when asked that question is a deflection. Unless you're trying to say that nukes are unsafe because of teenagers talking on the phone. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Have you seen the movie Wargames? " Do not underestimate the dangers of a teenager. Edited June 15, 2006 by Judge Hades
astr0creep Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 If a Strawman falls in a forest does it make a sound? More importantly: Is it its function to fall? Even more importantly: Is it safe before falling, during the fall or after? Uberimportantly: If a Strawman falls in the forest does it trigger a nucular explosion? http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 (edited) Talking about teenagers when asked that question is a deflection. Unless you're trying to say that nukes are unsafe because of teenagers talking on the phone. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Have you seen the movie Wargames? " <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes I have. Matthew Broderick, Thermonuclear War. Yadda Yadda. Thank god for Tic-Tac-Toe/ As for "a kill being a kill," I suppose you'd have a point. If the intent of firearms was to kill the person using it, or the intent of nuclear warheads to kill the person storing it. Edited June 15, 2006 by alanschu
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Does it matter who is the one killed. No human life is more important than another.
thepixiesrock Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Alan, we tried that angle already. They are making them so that they will be less likely to go off accidentally, and so that if they get stolen, they will not be able to be fired. You think of it like they are designed to just blow up anything. They are designed to blow up who ever the creator of the bomb wants to blow up. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He just doesn't understand. Lou Gutman, P.I.- It's like I'm not even trying anymore!http://theatomicdanger.iforumer.com/index....theatomicdangerOne billion b-balls dribbling simultaneously throughout the galaxy. One trillion b-balls being slam dunked through a hoop throughout the galaxy. I can feel every single b-ball that has ever existed at my fingertips. I can feel their collective knowledge channeling through my viens. Every jumpshot, every rebound and three-pointer, every layup, dunk, and free throw. I am there.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 (edited) Does it matter who is the one killed. No human life is more important than another Yes, it does. So despite the fact that things like safeties for guns have resulted in less accidental deaths with firearms, they're as unsafe as a gun without a safety? Edited June 15, 2006 by alanschu
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Yes. They are designed to kill. Something that is designed to kill I cannot deem safe no matter what "features" they have.
Llyranor Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 I wish I lived in an utopia where nukes didn't exist and where I could dance with the terrorists! I wouldn't even need to make my nukes safer because the terrorists would be dancing with me. It'd be grand. alanschu would be invited too, and then I'd kick his fascist butt. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Yes. They are designed to kill. Something that is designed to kill I cannot deem safe no matter what "features" they have. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Would you feel just as safe if the nukes you live on top of could go off randomly for no particular reason?
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 You want to dance with terrorists? Personally I rather just kill them.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 You want to dance with terrorists? Personally I rather just kill them. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Too bad there's no way to safely do it, by minimizing accidental deaths.
Llyranor Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Using what? Unsafe nukes? (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Would you feel just as safe if the nukes you live on top of could go off randomly for no particular reason? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I rather rely on chance than the human animal.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Using what? Unsafe nukes? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd rather use the ones that didn't spontaneously blow up when I fired them though!
Llyranor Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 You want to dance with terrorists? Personally I rather just kill them. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Too bad there's no way to safely do it, by minimizing accidental deaths. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Murder is still murder, alanschu. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Too bad there's no way to safely do it, by minimizing accidental deaths. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> A death is a death, accidental or no they are both just as sweet.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Would you feel just as safe if the nukes you live on top of could go off randomly for no particular reason? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I rather rely on chance than the human animal. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Except in both cases the human animal still exists. So you'd rather live on top of a bomb that could go off, rather than one that won't go off?
thepixiesrock Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Hahahahahahahahaha. Lou Gutman, P.I.- It's like I'm not even trying anymore!http://theatomicdanger.iforumer.com/index....theatomicdangerOne billion b-balls dribbling simultaneously throughout the galaxy. One trillion b-balls being slam dunked through a hoop throughout the galaxy. I can feel every single b-ball that has ever existed at my fingertips. I can feel their collective knowledge channeling through my viens. Every jumpshot, every rebound and three-pointer, every layup, dunk, and free throw. I am there.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Too bad there's no way to safely do it, by minimizing accidental deaths. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> A death is a death, accidental or no they are both just as sweet. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm sure you'd feel the same way when you try using a gun on a guy that is trying to kill you, only to have it misfire and have you kill yourself.
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 (edited) Except in both cases the human animal still exists. So you'd rather live on top of a bomb that could go off, rather than one that won't go off? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it doesn't go off then what purpose does it serve? Edited June 15, 2006 by Judge Hades
Judge Hades Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 I'm sure you'd feel the same way when you try using a gun on a guy that is trying to kill you, only to have it misfire and have you kill yourself. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wouldn't be the first time.
alanschu Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 (edited) I'm sure you'd feel the same way when you try using a gun on a guy that is trying to kill you, only to have it misfire and have you kill yourself. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wouldn't be the first time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Considering you're still alive, I'm pretty sure it would be. EDIT: Whatever. You're clearly just trolling the waters now. Joke's on us. Edited June 15, 2006 by alanschu
Recommended Posts