Lucius Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 (edited) Rummy, quite unexpectedly, gets accused of being a liar by former CIA dude. I DIDN'T LIE! The only good positive thing from Rummy here is that he actually wanted the guy to stay before the lynch ready mob around him was about to have him escorted out. Edit: my browser has me clicking OK to activex quite a few times first when entering the site, just a warning. Edited May 6, 2006 by Lucius DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Rummy under fire should just be fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 I was wondering when someone was going to confront the Bush administration with some of their previous (patently eggregiously false) statements and ask them to Please Explain? ... OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted May 6, 2006 Author Share Posted May 6, 2006 So. what did ya think? DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WITHTEETH Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Rumsfield looked stumped, and searched for a creative answer but that CIA guy nailed him. If only bush would get into specifics like Rumsfield attempted. Everytime Bush is asked a question he gets all emotional and starts glorifying the war and drops the word intelligence a efw times. 32% approval rating still, pretty soon the congress will be pwnd by democrats me thinks. Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 We need to have a vote of no confidence against George W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyranor Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Better yet, we need to have a vote of no confidence against Hades! Am I rite, folks, am I rite? (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddo36 Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Everyone in the White House at this moment needs to be fired/impeached/lynched/whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WITHTEETH Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 (edited) Everyone in the White House at this moment needs to be fired/impeached/lynched/whatever. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> just wait till the democrats have their next chance in congress to take it over. There might be an impeachment. The hypocritical republicans that wanted to impeach clinton for lying about getting a BJ can bite me. Edited May 7, 2006 by WITHTEETH Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 The hypocritical republicans that wanted to impeach clinton for lying about getting a BJ can bite me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> uh, lying under oath is a felony. learn the law. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 oh, and they didn't just "want to impeach" clinton... they did it. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted May 7, 2006 Author Share Posted May 7, 2006 (edited) But a lie that leads your nation and a coalition of other nations to war shouldn't have anywhere near the same consequences as a lie about a BJ... or what? I'm all for destroying those radical islamofascists basrards, this just wasn't the right target. <_< Edited May 7, 2006 by Lucius DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WITHTEETH Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 (edited) oh, and they didn't just "want to impeach" clinton... they did it. taks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Watch out, taks on PMS again. ^_^ Edited May 7, 2006 by WITHTEETH Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Di Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 LOL, Rummy is a joke. A dangerous joke. I don't know what kind of blackmail photos he has in his safe deposit box, but I get the impression Rummy could actually blow up congress and set the Whitehouse on fire, and Bush STILL wouldn't recognize what an inept fool he is. Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsingham Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Everyone in the White House at this moment needs to be fired/impeached/lynched/whatever. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's my belief that they need a large, ruddy-faced woman in a gingham dress to give them hugs. Then sit them down to a spread of possum, grit, cornbread and fried chicken. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Skywalker Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 IMO, Rummy's biggest failure was sticking to the NeoCon fantasy of a "light, nimble force" when, what was clearly needed, was an "overwhelming force" a la "the Powell doctrine". also, the lack of suitable vehicles and armor for urban warfare is just unacceptable. the overarching justification for the war may have been false but, it could be argued that, for a variety of reasons, we needed to assert our power in that region. I don't really have a problem with the concept of the second Iraq war. I have a problem with its implementation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsingham Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Light nimble wasn't the problem. It was actually a lack of infantry, IMO. You could still have used a light nimble force provided you attached a 'police' unit into the division structure to handle civilians in captured territory. Having said that I don't approve of the light nimble idea when it comes to warfighting, and I agree that Rummy is an ass. But I'm not going to say so to his face. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Cruel and unusual gruel? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now