Laozi Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I was going to watch the original trilogy today, but lucky for me I came across this just before. http://www.sounddoctrine.com/baphomet.htm man that was a close on. People laugh when I say that I think a jellyfish is one of the most beautiful things in the world. What they don't understand is, I mean a jellyfish with long, blond hair.
Kor Qel Droma Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Yoda is a hermaphrodite. Add the "a" to "yod", and you have a feminized proper noun. Jaguars4ever is still alive. No word of a lie.
Laozi Posted March 4, 2006 Author Posted March 4, 2006 (edited) "Yes, the wiles of Satan are indeed wiley" I wonder if this makes Vader out to be the Arch-Angel then. Edited March 4, 2006 by Laozi People laugh when I say that I think a jellyfish is one of the most beautiful things in the world. What they don't understand is, I mean a jellyfish with long, blond hair.
Moose Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I saw an article on the net that claimed Star Wars was an islamic universe There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts
Marka Ragnos Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 well, the writing for basic is a simplified hebrew or something.
Moose Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I suppose the article was correct. Star Wars after all is fiction. There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts
metadigital Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I like the over-use of punctuation to coerce the reader into confronting reality, thus: ... You don't believe there is a Devil? Let's get real!! He has your ultimate destruction as his never ending goal. ... But, if the goal is never-ending, then surely the Devil will never achieve it? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
SteveThaiBinh Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Yoda is not an exact image by any means, but those who have a discerning spirit can see the deceiving hand of Satan there. I don't have a discerning spirit. "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov)
the dude Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 hah, I wonder if the author of that was a fundamentalist....and I suppose that they've never heard of coincidence. Besides, the pentagram wasn't always associated with satanism. words are weightless here on earth because they're free
6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Man, more I see this sort of crap the more I hate Christians and religion in general. Harvey
kirottu Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 There This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
astr0creep Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 In the PSR link, you can learn that Mohamed was an irish man... http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/
kirottu Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 You should open your eyes and see the big picture outside your own experiences. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
metadigital Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Ninjas are totally sweet and awesome and flip out everywhere. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I only go by what I personally experience. Harvey
kirottu Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I only go by what I personally experience. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But the World doesn This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 And your point? Only through empiracal observation of events can one only gain unbiased knowledge and wisdom. Obtaining information any other way will only give you biased and sometimes blatantly wrong information. Harvey
kirottu Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 (edited) And your point? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My point was that world is big place and your personal experiences cover only small part of it, therefore you should try to see the big picture. Only through empiracal observation of events can one only gain unbiased knowledge and wisdom. Obtaining information any other way will only give you biased and sometimes blatantly wrong information. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I have to disagree. We are people. We are always biased to some extent. We all watch the world through our own eyes, world colored by our past experiences. It Edited March 4, 2006 by kirottu This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Yes, but it would be my bias and no one elses. Harvey
Baley Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 Tell me why God exists, from an empirical point of view.
6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 (edited) Why does God exist? Hmmm... Why not. To be serious, only you can tell yourself why God exists or if he exists at all. For you to gain that answer you must experience that answer for yourself. Edited March 4, 2006 by 6 Foot Invisible Rabbit Harvey
Baley Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 That's an equivocal statement. You have on many occasions expressed your belief in both God and his adversary, can you or can you not present empirical proof?
Plano Skywalker Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 That's an equivocal statement. You have on many occasions expressed your belief in both God and his adversary, can you or can you not present empirical proof? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't know if it's "proof" per se but I think the most *logical* argument is to simply state the tautology that every atheist must, by definition, embrace: "matter and energy cannot be created but the universe created itself." all you can do is change the subject, or make an assertion that cannot be proven (such as the ever-looping universe)...you cannot wiggle out that tautology if you leave a higher power out of the picture without falling into the same "trap" that creatists do, which is to rely on that which cannot be empirically quantified.
Baley Posted March 4, 2006 Posted March 4, 2006 I have yet to state my beliefs on the universe's genesis.
Recommended Posts