I was going to watch the original trilogy today, but lucky for me I came across this just before. http://www.sounddoctrine.com/baphomet.htm

 

 

man that was a close on.

Yoda is a hermaphrodite.  Add the "a" to "yod",  and you have a feminized  proper noun.

"Yes, the wiles of Satan are indeed wiley"

 

 

I wonder if this makes Vader out to be the Arch-Angel then.

Edited March 4, 200619 yr by Laozi

I saw an article on the net that claimed Star Wars was an islamic universe

well, the writing for basic is a simplified hebrew or something.

I suppose the article was correct. Star Wars after all is fiction.

I like the over-use of punctuation to coerce the reader into confronting reality, thus:

...

You don't believe there is a Devil? Let's get real!! He has your ultimate destruction as his never ending goal.

...

 

But, if the goal is never-ending, then surely the Devil will never achieve it?

Yoda is not an exact image by any means, but those who have a discerning spirit can see the deceiving hand of Satan there.

I don't have a discerning spirit.

hah, I wonder if the author of that was a fundamentalist....and I suppose that they've never heard of coincidence. Besides, the pentagram wasn't always associated with satanism.

Man, more I see this sort of crap the more I hate Christians and religion in general.

There

In the PSR link, you can learn that Mohamed was an irish man...

There

You should open your eyes and see the big picture outside your own experiences.

Ninjas are totally sweet and awesome and flip out everywhere.

I only go by what I personally experience.

I only go by what I personally experience.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

But the World doesn

And your point? Only through empiracal observation of events can one only gain unbiased knowledge and wisdom. Obtaining information any other way will only give you biased and sometimes blatantly wrong information.

And your point?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

My point was that world is big place and your personal experiences cover only small part of it, therefore you should try to see the big picture.

 

Only through empiracal observation of events can one only gain unbiased knowledge and wisdom.  Obtaining information any other way will only give you biased and sometimes blatantly wrong information.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

I have to disagree. We are people. We are always biased to some extent. We all watch the world through our own eyes, world colored by our past experiences. It

Edited March 4, 200619 yr by kirottu

Yes, but it would be my bias and no one elses.

Tell me why God exists, from an empirical point of view.

Why does God exist? Hmmm... Why not.

 

To be serious, only you can tell yourself why God exists or if he exists at all. For you to gain that answer you must experience that answer for yourself.

Edited March 4, 200619 yr by 6 Foot Invisible Rabbit

That's an equivocal statement. You have on many occasions expressed your belief in both God and his adversary, can you or can you not present empirical proof?

That's an equivocal statement. You have on many occasions expressed your belief in both God and his adversary, can you or can you not present empirical proof?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

I don't know if it's "proof" per se but I think the most *logical* argument is to simply state the tautology that every atheist must, by definition, embrace:

"matter and energy cannot be created but the universe created itself."

 

all you can do is change the subject, or make an assertion that cannot be proven (such as the ever-looping universe)...you cannot wiggle out that tautology if you leave a higher power out of the picture without falling into the same "trap" that creatists do, which is to rely on that which cannot be empirically quantified.

I have yet to state my beliefs on the universe's genesis.