Jorian Drake Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 They will do a great job, if not so, they would already released something with the name of Fallout,but they didn't. <_< They let the time to make a great game, and they r in contact with most of the original game dev.-s. Not many other dev.-s novadays do that So, as I said already: Give them a chance, if they do a nice Fallout with Oblivion graphs then you realize all, that its not so bad :D
Llyranor Posted January 25, 2006 Author Posted January 25, 2006 In conclusion, I believe Star Trek games may either be very good or very very bad. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
GhostofAnakin Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Die slowly and painfully my child. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you'd rather the game fail than hope that it has a chance to actually live up to expectation and you'd enjoy it? "Console exclusive is such a harsh word." - Darque"Console exclusive is two words Darque." - Nartwak (in response to Darque's observation)
Jorian Drake Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Star Trek games have largely been a disappointment to date. So, what's the fuss?It will either: 1) be mediocre like the rest of the games in the franchise. 2) be good I was just talking to a coworker the other day and we agreed that it would be nice to see a KOTOR-style RPG set a Star Trek setting. Oh well, I hope they get this one right, even though it is not an RPG. I'll wait for the reviews though. (I'm not waiting for reviews to get Empire At War....that game is going to be awesome). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh, something about Star Trek :D <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Again, we (Bethesda Softworks) are just publishing/QA'ing the games. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ya from Bethesda?
Darque Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Die slowly and painfully my child. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you'd rather the game fail than hope that it has a chance to actually live up to expectation and you'd enjoy it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I want a new game to play, so I'm giving Bethesda a chance. 'sides, I like Morrowind.
Shadowstrider Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 In conclusion, I believe Star Trek games may either be very good or very very bad. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Or something in between. Right? RIGHT?!?1!ONE?
Judge Hades Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 The fact of the matter is you've probably got the game pre-ordered. Logic > u. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I do not have the f**king game pre-ordered. If I had the f**king game pre-ordered I would have taken that money back so I can pay bills that I am behind on since being unemployed for a f**king month.
Gabrielle Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Die slowly and painfully my child. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you'd rather the game fail than hope that it has a chance to actually live up to expectation and you'd enjoy it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I won't enjoy it. It already failed when other people working on it, not in any way shape or form connected with the original devs.
Darque Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Die slowly and painfully my child. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you'd rather the game fail than hope that it has a chance to actually live up to expectation and you'd enjoy it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I won't enjoy it. It already failed when other people working on it, not in any way shape or form connected with the original devs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wouldn't KotOR 2 fall under that as well?
Haitoku Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Heh, even if the game was good, you guys would force yourselves to hate it.
karka Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 I really like to see a turn-based, isometric Elder Scrolls game! Spiderweb should buy ES rights. Such a game would be great!
GhostofAnakin Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 I won't enjoy it. It already failed when other people working on it, not in any way shape or form connected with the original devs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Was the EXACT same development team in charge of both FO1 and FO2? You seemed to enjoy both of those. "Console exclusive is such a harsh word." - Darque"Console exclusive is two words Darque." - Nartwak (in response to Darque's observation)
Gabrielle Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Die slowly and painfully my child. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you'd rather the game fail than hope that it has a chance to actually live up to expectation and you'd enjoy it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I won't enjoy it. It already failed when other people working on it, not in any way shape or form connected with the original devs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wouldn't KotOR 2 fall under that as well? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> There's still a connection. LA still in control, Bioware loaning out the game engine and probably taking care of questions from Obs. Fallout 3 has no such connections.
Judge Hades Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 For me it doesn't matter if the developers are different. For me that isn't the issue.
Darque Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 For me it doesn't matter if the developers are different. For me that isn't the issue. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I hate to say it, but the harder you protest the more I want Morrowind with guns I'm not sure why
Plano Skywalker Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Again, we (Bethesda Softworks) are just publishing/QA'ing the games. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> indeed, Shadowstrider is right on that point... quote from article: Star Trek: Legacy is being developed at the studios of Mad Doc Software, creators of the highly successful and critically acclaimed Star Trek Armada II. however, Bethesda leaves the door open with:
Judge Hades Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 All I want out of Fallout 3 is a good story driven CRPG that uses the SPECIAL rules system, that lets me play in true turn base fashion at 3/4 camera angle, and stay s true to cannon Fallout as much as possible. That is it. If they want to make it that the world is in full 3D which allows the player multiple camera angles and a real time option, then so be it. Just as the options I look for is there I'm happy.
Jorian Drake Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Heh, even if the game was good, you guys would force yourselves to hate it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yup, they r already doing that :D
Gabrielle Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 I won't enjoy it. It already failed when other people working on it, not in any way shape or form connected with the original devs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Was the EXACT same development team in charge of both FO1 and FO2? You seemed to enjoy both of those. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Tim Cain Feargus Urquhart Leonard Boyarsky T-Ray Isaac To name some.
Jorian Drake Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Again, we (Bethesda Softworks) are just publishing/QA'ing the games. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> indeed, Shadowstrider is right on that point... quote from article: Star Trek: Legacy is being developed at the studios of Mad Doc Software, creators of the highly successful and critically acclaimed Star Trek Armada II. however, Bethesda leaves the door open with:
GhostofAnakin Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Tim CainFeargus Urquhart Leonard Boyarsky T-Ray Isaac To name some. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Name them all. Because 4 names don't make it the exact same development team. Didn't MCA just write for FO2? So then he had no business writing because he didn't work on FO1, by your estimation? "Console exclusive is such a harsh word." - Darque"Console exclusive is two words Darque." - Nartwak (in response to Darque's observation)
Judge Hades Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 If someone makes a Star Trek CRPG I hope they use the TNG era and a version of the PnP rules.
Llyranor Posted January 25, 2006 Author Posted January 25, 2006 The thing is, it wouldn't matter if the game was "good". Morrowind is "good". Oblivion will be "good" and win RPG of the Year from every magazine and website out there. Fallout 3 *will* probably be "good" too. But that doesn't mean much in this day and age. Hey, most people may like it, just not my type of games. I didn't like Morrowind. To the point where that's pretty much the last Bethesda RPG product I'll ever buy. They may or may not make good games depending on who you ask, but I'm staying away from their RPGs. Fallout 3 will not be missed by me, just mocked relentlessly. (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
Jorian Drake Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Tim CainFeargus Urquhart Leonard Boyarsky T-Ray Isaac To name some. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Name them all. Because 4 names don't make it the exact same development team. Didn't MCA just write for FO2? So then he had no business writing because he didn't work on FO1, by your estimation? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> :D
Plano Skywalker Posted January 25, 2006 Posted January 25, 2006 Fallout 3 will not be missed by me, just mocked relentlessly. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you know, they MIGHT just hit a home run with it. nobody thought BioWare could create a true SW CRPG but they did.
Recommended Posts