ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 Why would they do that ? They may have realised that the game would sell more at the time it was released than if they waited till just after the holidays (when most people are tapped out). I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
dufflover Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 Indeed. Why ruin your own product? Pure Pazaak - The Stand-alone Multiplayer Pazaak Game (link to Obsidian board thread) Pure Pazaak website (big thank you to fingolfin)
Styur Voln Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 They 'ruined' it to make bigger profits, not to destroy the game. They probably thought we wouldn't notice that there is no kind of a good ending or explanation of wtf's going on.
Judge Hades Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 They purposedly ruined it, sabotage it, by releasing it unfinished, with so much cut content, and next to nil tech support afterwards. Don't put out a game unless you can support it fully.
ignis_phoenix Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 (edited) LucasArts are a fine example of a company who only care about profits and dont give a rats arse about anyone. Most people blame Obsidian for the glitches & unfinished storyline, but it was all LucasArts fault :angry: And by the way my answer to the question is no, because LA probably never even cared how the game turned out as long as it made money (if it is good, then its a bonus for them) Edited December 22, 2005 by ignis_phoenix
BattleCookiee Posted December 22, 2005 Posted December 22, 2005 * No bashing of other companies The last time things like these popped up it didn't end too well either, so this one get's locked before it comes so far... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Locked untill further notice...
Recommended Posts