See We're not religious nuts!.....

[kumquatq3]

DOVER, Pa.

[Darque]

 

Learn your geography.

 

That's the midwest, not the south.

 

Besides, that's Kansas... they're kinda weird out there (and as someone from Missouri I'm entitled to that opinion)

Edited November 10, 2005 by Darque

[kumquatq3]

Well, when Texas revolts, Kansas will go with it.

 

Hence, I call it "The South".

[Hurlshort]

Pat Robertson put out a statement claiming the city risks the wrath of God for this decision.

[Darque]

I think Chaos theory explains "intelligent design"

[Diamond]

But we are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too far from connecting these two together.

[Craigboy2]

DOVER, Pa.

Edited November 11, 2005 by Craigboy2

[WITHTEETH]

Anything under the Mason Dixie line is super Christy

[Craigboy2]

Anything under the Mason Dixie line is super Christy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm not religious.

[WITHTEETH]

Anything under the Mason Dixie line is super Christy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm not religious.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Im not Spiderman.

[LoneWolf16]

Anything under the Mason Dixie line is super Christy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm not religious.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Im not Spiderman.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

[Fionavar]

I'm not fond of SPAM ...

 

/subtle hint

[Bokishi]

I'm not fond of SPAM ...

 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

That's news to me

[Arclam]

Religious Nut

 

"

Edited November 11, 2005 by Arclam

[Darkside]

I still say Intelligent Desing should be saved for philosphy and religion classes because it's more conceptual, while science classes should be reserved for evolution, because it's fact-based.

 

I'm an Intelligent Disign Christy person myself, but I'm not going to argue with people. Besides, I believe we were created, but through evolution. (I'll go into an explanation only if someone is stupid enough to ask.)

[Deraldin]

(I'll go into an explanation only if someone is stupid enough to ask.)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

*stupidly asks*

[julianw]

Religious Nut

 

"

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Some one ought to give Patty a spanking.

 

Darkside - (Amazement and admiration). Are you really 14? You make me feel as if I have wasted my whole life so far. <_< That's it. I am worshipping you from now on. What should your religion be called, my Lady? Do you need a chief administrator?

[LoneWolf16]

(I'll go into an explanation only if someone is stupid enough to ask.)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

*stupidly asks*

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

*Stupidly seconded*

[julianw]

Though DS has yet to reply to my request at joining Her religion, I will try to answer for my Lady: God ---> Nature ---> Evolution. Is that clear enough?

[Deraldin]

Though DS has yet to reply to my request at joining Her religion, I will try to answer for my Lady: God ---> Nature ---> Evolution. Is that clear enough?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

It's just not the same if Darkside doesn't explain it.

[julianw]

Though DS has yet to reply to my request at joining Her religion, I will try to answer for my Lady: God ---> Nature ---> Evolution. Is that clear enough?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

It's just not the same if Darkside doesn't explain it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I know. I am merely the mirror that reflects the Sun that is Her Glory.

Edited November 11, 2005 by julianw

[Dark Moth]

I think some people misinterpret why ID is being taught in schools in the first place. While you could say that the right-wing is trying to impose religion on us through schools, I think a big reason is simply to avoid offending those who do believe in creationism (and that does not include just Christians). If you teach evolution in schools as solid fact, someone with very strong religious ties might take offense to that (laugh at it if you want, but it would happen). Basically, you'd be telling the person that his/her religion is wrong. I think a big purpose here is to try to avoid controversy by simply presenting both sides of the issue.

 

EDIT: I believe Darkside is saying that she believes God created man through the process of evolution. We did not evolve, in other words, through mere chance. Some higher being jumpstarted evolution for us. Am I right fellas? I mean, am I right?

Edited November 11, 2005 by Mothman

[WITHTEETH]

Both sides? No then we would have to teach ALL sides. Flying Speghetti Monster, Pink Unicorns Vishnu, Shakti, That which can only be described as "that", Isis, Madza, Mithra, Isis, Christ, Zeus and on and on and on.

 

I agree with Darkside, Save it for a comparitive religion, christinity, or philosophy class. We did discuss is in my philiosophy classes.

Edited November 11, 2005 by WITHTEETH

[Dark Moth]

Both sides? No then we would have to teach ALL sides. Flying Speghetti Monster, Pink Unicorns Vishnu, Shakti, That which can only be described as "that", Isis, Madza, Mithra, Isis, Christ, Zeus and on and on and on.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Now that's just silly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You forgot the Norse Pantheon. "

[WITHTEETH]

simple logic

Science needs to be science.

Intelligent design is not science.

Thus intelligent design should not be taught in science.

Edited November 11, 2005 by WITHTEETH